Earthquake Prediction for the Düzce Province in the Marmara Region Using Artificial Intelligence
Source abstract
Abstract
By definition, an earthquake is a naturally occurring event. This natural event may be a disaster that causes significant damage, loss of life, and other economic effects. The possibility of predicting a natural event such as an earthquake will minimize the negative effects mentioned above. In this study, data collection, processing, and data evaluation regarding earthquakes were carried out. Earthquake forecasting was performed using the RNN (recurrent neural network) method. This study was carried out using seismic data with a magnitude of 3.0 and above of the Düzce Province between 1990 and 2022. In order to increase the learning potential of the method, the b and d values of earthquakes were calculated. The detection of earthquakes within a specific time interval in the Marmara region of Turkey, the classification of earthquake-related seismic data using artificial neural networks, and the generation of predictions for the future highlight the importance of this study. Our results demonstrated that the prediction performance could be significantly improved by incorporating the b and d coefficients of earthquakes, as well as the data regarding the distance between the Moon and the Earth, along with the use of recurrent neural networks (RNNs).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · earthquake and tectonic studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul 34295, Turkey
Department of Computer Engineering, Istinye University, Istanbul 34396, Turkey
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction the Locations of Future Earthquakes in Eastern Part of Iraq Using GIS Techniques
2. The umbrian earthquake (Italy) of 19 september 1979
3. Status of historical seismology in Japan
4. Larger aftershocks happen farther away: Nonseparability of magnitude and spatial distributions of aftershocks10.1002/2015GL064734 ↗
5. A Bayesian Reasoning for Earthquake Prediction Based on IoT System
6. Artificial intelligence based techniques for earthquake prediction: A review
7. Artificial Intelligence Aided Engineering Education: State of the Art, Potentials and Challenges
8. Brykov, M.N., Petryshynets, I., Pruncu, C.I., Efremenko, V.G., Pimenov, D.Y., Giasin, K., Sylenko, S.A., and Wojciechowski, S. (2020). Machine learning modelling and feature engineering in seismology experiment. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20154228 ↗
9. pyts: A Python Package for Time Series Classification
10. ObsPy: A bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem10.1088/1749-4699/8/1/014003 ↗
11. Earthquake forecasting using neural networks: Results and future work10.1007/s11071-006-2018-1 ↗
12. Neural network models for earthquake magnitude prediction using multiple seismicity indicators10.1142/S0129065707000890 ↗
13. A probabilistic neural network for earthquake magnitude prediction10.1016/j.neunet.2009.05.003 ↗
14. Artificial neural networks for earthquake prediction using time series magnitude data or seismic electric signals10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.043 ↗
15. Yapay Sinir Ağı Yöntemiyle Deprem Tahmini: Türkiye Batı Anadolu Fay Hattı Uygulaması
16. Kastamonu ve yakın çevresi için deprem olasılığı tahminleri
17. Christopoulos, S.R.G., Varotsos, P.K., Perez-Oregon, J., Papadopoulou, K.A., Skordas, E.S., and Sarlis, N.V. (2022). Natural time analysis of global seismicity. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157496 ↗
18. Forecasting earthquakes: The relm test10.1109/MCSE.2012.87 ↗
19. Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones10.1007/BF00876083 ↗
20. Xiong, P., Marchetti, D., De Santis, A., Zhang, X., and Shen, X. (2021). SafeNet: SwArm for earthquake perturbations identification using deep learning networks. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13245033 ↗
21. Possible earthquake forecasting in a narrow space-time-magnitude window10.1007/s12145-020-00535-9 ↗
22. Magnitude estimation using the first three seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning10.1029/2006GL026871 ↗
23. What we can learn from Japan’s early earthquake warning system
24. The effect of the Earth’s surface on the S wave particle motion10.1785/BSSA0510020237 ↗
25. Aristarchus Yöntemi ile Ay ve Güneş
26. Development of the Distance Earth-Moon
27. (2022, January 07). Moon Distance Calculator. Available online: https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/moon/distance.html.
28. Ceylan, S. (2008). Marmara Depremlerinin Kaotik Özellikleri ve Fraktal Analizi. [Ph.D. Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
29. Depremselliğin fraktal boyutu ve beklenen güçlü depremlerin orta vadede bölgesel olarak tahmini üzerine bir modelleme: Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi, Türkiye10.17714/gufbed.2015.05.001 ↗
30. Öztürk, S. (2017, January 11–13). Elazığ Depremleri İçin Gutenberg-Rıchter B-Değeri Ve Fraktal Boyut Dc-Değerinin İstatistiksel Bir Analizi. Proceedings of the 4th UluslararasıDeprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Eskişehir, Turkey.
31. Earthquake hazard of the Aegean extension region (West Turkey)
32. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 ↗
33. Gao, Y., and Glowacka, D. (2016, January 16–18). Deep gate recurrent neural network. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Machine Learning, Hamilton, New Zealand.
34. Prediction of rockhead using a hybrid N-XGBoost machine learning framework10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.012 ↗
35. Chen, Q., Yang, H., Guo, M., Kannan, R.S., Mars, J., and Tang, L. (2017, January 8–12). Prophet: Precise qos prediction on non-preemptive accelerators to improve utilization in warehouse-scale computers. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Xi’an, China.10.1145/3037697.3037700 ↗
36. Ariyo, A.A., Adewumi, A.O., and Ayo, C.K. (2014, January 26–28). Stock price prediction using the ARIMA model. Proceedings of the 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK.10.1109/UKSim.2014.67 ↗
37. Mean absolute percentage error for regression models10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗