The role of in situ formed lamellar Mg‒Al hydrotalcite on densification of high‐chrome castables for coal gasifier
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The gasifier is a critical component in coal gasification technology, enabling the efficient and environmentally friendly utilization of coal resources. However, premature failure of aluminum phosphate‐bonded high‐chrome bricks in the gasifier has been observed due to phosphate migration in reducing atmospheres, which exacerbates slag penetration and thermal spalling. In this study, hydratable alumina‐bonded high‐chrome castables were prepared, and the effect of active magnesia on their properties was investigated. Hydrates were characterized using X‐ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared, thermogravimetry‒differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy analyses. The results revealed that an appropriate amount of active magnesia could accelerate the hydration of hydratable alumina, promoting the formation of micro‐nano‐sized lamellar Mg‒Al hydrotalcite. This effectively filled the pores within the castables, thereby improving their properties. During heat treatment, the micro‐nano‐sized Mg‒Al hydrotalcites decomposed into micro‐nano‐sized MgAl 2 O 4 spinel, which readily reacted with Cr 2 O 3 to form Mg(Cr, Al) 2 O 4 spinel solid solutions. This phenomenon facilitated sintering at 1600°C, optimizing the internal structure and ultimately leading to enhanced mechanical properties and improved slag resistance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
National‐Provincial Joint Engineering Research Center of High Temperature Materials and Lining Technology Wuhan China
Joint International Research Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Ministry of Education Wuhan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.36110.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.361 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.09510.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.095 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ces.2021.11741210.1016/j.ces.2021.117412 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0955‐2219(03)00023‐210.1016/S0955‐2219(03)00023‐2 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1992.tb05516.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1992.tb05516.x ↗
6. 10.1016/0272‐8842(82)90016‐510.1016/0272‐8842(82)90016‐5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.02210.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.022 ↗
8. Refractory liner materials used in slagging gasifiers
9. 10.1021/ef900101a10.1021/ef900101a ↗
10. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.10825010.1016/j.corsci.2019.108250 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661‐011‐0635‐x10.1007/s11661‐011‐0635‐x ↗
12. 10.1111/ijac.1405710.1111/ijac.14057 ↗
13. Bennett J · 2019
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.11674110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.116741 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.23410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.234 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.19810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.198 ↗
17. Effect of nanosilica on hydration behavior and rheological properties of hydratable alumina
18. Hydration behavior of ρ‐Al2O3 in different media
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.03410.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.034 ↗
20. 10.1016/0167‐2738(86)90067‐610.1016/0167‐2738(86)90067‐6 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.24610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.246 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13324210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133242 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.09.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.09.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.07.01210.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.07.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12195210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121952 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.08110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.081 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.20110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.201 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.035 ↗
31. Corrosion resistance of alumina magnesia refractory based on digital image correlation method
32. 10.1016/j.oceram.2023.10050310.1016/j.oceram.2023.100503 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1974.tb11372.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1974.tb11372.x ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.00510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.24210.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.242 ↗
36. 10.1631/jzus.A200002310.1631/jzus.A2000023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.27110.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.271 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.15310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.153 ↗
39. 10.2109/jcersj2.1817910.2109/jcersj2.18179 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.07410.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.074 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.01710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.017 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13173610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131736 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10829710.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108297 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.02.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.02.035 ↗