PlanetiQ Radio Occultation: Preliminary Comparative Analysis of Neutral Profiles vs. COSMIC and NWP Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Radio Occultation (RO) is pivotal for profiling the neutral and ionized atmosphere, with the PlanetiQ mission, via its GNOMES satellites, striving to establish an advanced atmospheric observing system. However, an assessment of the spatiotemporal distributions of PlanetiQ observations and comparisons with reliable datasets are lacking. This study addresses this gap by examining the temporal and spatial distribution of RO observations from PlanetiQ during its initial 198 operational days in 2023, alongside comparisons with COSMIC and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Data from GN02, GN03, and GN04 satellites, yielding 1099, 1313, and 1843 RO events per day, respectively, were analyzed. The satellite constellation’s observations demonstrate a generally well-distributed pattern, albeit minor deficiencies in equatorial and polar regions. Single-profile comparisons with COSMIC data reveal strong correlations for pressure, temperature, Water Vapor Pressure (WVP), and refractivity profiles, with temperature exhibiting larger variations (RMSE = 1.24 °C). Statistical analyses confirm statistically insignificant differences between the PlanetiQ and COSMIC profiles at the same spatio-temporal coordinates. Comparisons with NWP models show slight differences with GFS, with overall RMSE values of 0.23 mb (WVP), 0.6 mb (pressure), 1.3 (refractivity), and 1.5 °C (temperature). However, assessments against GFS/ECMWF models indicate overall compatibility, with insignificant differences between PlanetiQ profiles and model observations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44159, Egypt
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Funding
King Saud University
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimization of GNSS-RO LEO satellite orbits for Egypt and the Middle East region10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.006 ↗
2. PlanetiQ (2024, February 01). Technology. Available online: https://planetiq.com/technology/.
3. Bai, W., Deng, N., Sun, Y., Du, Q., Xia, J., Wang, X., Meng, X., Zhao, D., Liu, C., and Tan, G. (2020). Applications of GNSS-RO to Numerical Weather Prediction and Tropical Cyclone Forecast. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11111204 ↗
4. Observing Earth’s atmosphere with radio occultation measurements using the Global Positioning System10.1029/97JD01569 ↗
5. The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Mission: Early Results10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313 ↗
6. COSMIC-2 radio occultation constellation: First results10.1029/2019GL086841 ↗
7. One-dimensional variational ionospheric retrieval using Radio Occultation bending angles: 1. Theory10.1029/2023SW003572 ↗
8. The atmospheric dynamics mission for global wind field measurement10.1175/BAMS-86-1-73 ↗
9. Consistency and structural uncertainty of multi-mission GPS radio occultation records10.5194/amt-13-2547-2020 ↗
10. Qiu, C., Wang, X., Zhou, K., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Li, H., Liu, D., and Yuan, H. (2023). Comparative Assessment of Spire and COSMIC-2 Radio Occultation Data Quality. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15215082 ↗
11. Zhang, H., Huangfu, J., Wang, X., Chen, W., Peng, W., Tang, Q., Chu, Y., and Xue, Z. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Binhu and Cosmic-2 Radio Occultation Data. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14194958 ↗
12. Ho, S.-P., Kireev, S., Shao, X., Zhou, X., and Jing, X. (2022). Processing and Validation of the STAR COSMIC-2 Temperature and Water Vapor Profiles in the Neutral Atmosphere. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14215588 ↗
13. Comparison of COSMIC Radio Occultation Refractivity Profiles with Radiosonde Measurements10.1007/s00376-009-8066-y ↗
14. Chen, S.-Y., Liu, C.-Y., Huang, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-C., Li, H.-W., Lin, P.-H., Cheng, J.-P., and Huang, C.-Y. (2021). An analysis study of FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 radio occultation data in the troposphere. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13040717 ↗
15. Analysis of the differences between GPS radio occultation and radiosonde atmosphere profiles in Egypt
16. Melbourne, W.G., Davis, E., Duncan, C., Hajj, G., Hardy, K., Kursinski, E., Meehan, T.K., Young, L.E., and Yunck, T.P. (1994). The Application of Spaceborne GPS to Atmospheric Limb Sounding and Global Change Monitoring.
17. Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere10.1029/97JD02400 ↗
18. A simulation analysis to optimize orbits for a tropical GPS radio occultation mission10.1186/BF03352596 ↗
19. The neutral atmosphere of Venus as studied with the Mariner V radio occultation experiments10.1086/111096 ↗
20. Characterizing Ionospheric Effect on GNSS Radio Occultation Atmospheric Bending Angle10.1029/2019JA027471 ↗
21. Impact of GPS/MET bending angle profiles on assimilation and forecasts for the period June 20–3010.1029/2001JD000345 ↗
22. Prol, F.S., Hoque, M.M., Hernández-Pajares, M., Yuan, L., Olivares-Pulido, G., von Engeln, A., Marquardt, C., and Notarpietro, R. (2023). Study of Ionospheric Bending Angle and Scintillation Profiles Derived by GNSS Radio-Occultation with MetOp-A Satellite. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15061663 ↗
23. Sun, J., Yang, C., and Xie, J. (2020). China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2020 Proceedings: Volume I, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-3715-8 ↗
24. Pelton, J., Madry, S., and Camacho-Lara, S. (2016). Handbook of Satellite Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6423-5 ↗
25. GNSS radio occultation excess-phase processing for climate applications including uncertainty estimation10.5194/amt-16-5217-2023 ↗
26. Pirscher, B. (2010). Multi-Satellite Climatologies of Fundamental Atmospheric Variables from Radio Occultation and Their Validation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Wegener Center Verlag Graz, University of Graz (Austria)].
27. Alizadeh, M., Wijaya, D., Hobiger, T., Weber, R., and Schuh, H. (2013). Atmospheric Effects in Space Geodesy, Springer.
28. Born, M., and Wolf, E. (1964). Principles of Optics, Pergamon.
29. An approach for retrieving marine boundary layer refractivity from GPS occultation data in the presence of superrefraction10.1175/JTECH1996.1 ↗
30. (2024, February 01). University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR). Available online: https://ucar.edu/.
31. (2024, February 01). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Available online: https://www.noaa.gov/.
32. (2024, February 01). European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Available online: https://www.ecmwf.int/.
33. Performance assessment of radio occultation data from GeoOptics by comparing with COSMIC data10.1186/s40623-022-01667-6 ↗
34. Refractivity and temperature climate records from multiple radio occultation satellites consistent within 0.05%10.5194/amt-4-2007-2011 ↗
35. A comparison of temperature and relative humidity measurements derived from COSMIC-2 radio occultations with radiosonde observations made over the Asian summer monsoon region10.1080/2150704X.2022.2033345 ↗
36. COSMIC-2 radio occultation temperature, specific humidity, and precipitable water in Hurricane Dorian (2019)10.3319/TAO.2021.06.14.01 ↗
37. Evaluation and Assimilation of the COSMIC-2 Radio Occultation Constellation Observed Atmospheric Refractivity in the WRF Data Assimilation System10.1029/2021JD034935 ↗
38. Preliminary validation of the refractivity from the new radio occultation sounder GNOS/FY-3C10.5194/amt-9-781-2016 ↗
39. Comparison of COSMIC-2 radio occultation retrievals with RS41 and RS92 radiosonde humidity and temperature measurements10.3319/TAO.2021.12.30.02 ↗
40. Evaluation of the 15-year ROM SAF monthly mean GPS radio occultation climate data record10.5194/amt-13-3081-2020 ↗