AOSMA-MLP: A Novel Method for Hybrid Metaheuristics Artificial Neural Networks and a New Approach for Prediction of Geothermal Reservoir Temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
To ascertain the optimal and most efficient reservoir temperature of a geothermal source, long-term field studies and analyses utilizing specialized devices are essential. Although these requirements increase project costs and induce delays, utilizing machine learning techniques based on hydrogeochemical data can minimize losses by accurately predicting reservoir temperatures. In recent years, applying hybrid methods to real-world challenges has become increasingly prevalent over traditional machine learning methodologies. This study introduces a novel machine learning approach, named AOSMA-MLP, integrating the adaptive opposition slime mould algorithm (AOSMA) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) techniques, specifically designed for predicting the reservoir temperature of geothermal resources. Additionally, this work compares the basic artificial neural network and widely recognized algorithms in the literature, such as the whale optimization algorithm, ant lion algorithm, and SMA, under equal conditions using various evaluation regression metrics. The results demonstrated that AOSMA-MLP outperforms basic MLP and other metaheuristic-based MLPs, with the AOSMA-trained MLP achieving the highest performance, indicated by an R2 value of 0.8514. The proposed AOSMA-MLP approach shows significant potential for yielding effective outcomes in various regression problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Neural Networks and Applications · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey
Department of Software Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa 45400, Turkey
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Simulation and prediction of conditions for effective development of shallow geothermal energy10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.028 ↗
2. Thermodynamic assessment of a geothermal power and cooling cogeneration system with cryogenic energy storage10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115616 ↗
3. Thermodynamic performance and economic feasibility of Kalina, Goswami and Organic Rankine Cycles coupled to a polygeneration plant using geothermal energy of low-grade temperature10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114362 ↗
4. International review of district heating and cooling10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.045 ↗
5. District cooling systems and individual cooling systems: Comparative analysis and impacts of key factors10.1080/23744731.2016.1214474 ↗
6. Geothermal energy: Power plant technology and direct heat applications10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.047 ↗
7. District cooling system via renewable energy sources: A review10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.023 ↗
8. Kanoğlu, M., Çengel, Y.A., and Cimbala, J.M. (2020). Fundamentals and Applications of Renewable Energy, McGraw-Hill Education.
9. District cooling systems: Technology integration, system optimization, challenges and opportunities for applications10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.051 ↗
10. A novel multigeneration system driven by a hybrid biogas-geothermal heat source, Part II: Multi-criteria optimization10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.035 ↗
11. Future directions and cycles for electricity production from geothermal resources10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.057 ↗
12. Prediction of reservoir temperatures using hydrogeochemical data, Western Anatolia geothermal systems (Turkey): A machine learning approach10.1007/s11053-019-09596-0 ↗
13. Trace-element hydrogeochemistry of thermal waters of Karakoçan (Elazığ) and Mazgirt (Tunceli), Eastern Anatolia, Turkey10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.07.006 ↗
14. Haklidir, F.S.T., and Haklidir, M. (2019, January 11–13). The fluid temperature prediction with hydro-geochemical indicators using a deep learning model: A case study Western Anatolia (Turkey). Proceedings of the 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
15. Modeling and prediction of geothermal reservoir temperature behavior using evolutionary design of neural networks10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.07.003 ↗
16. Hydrogeochemical investigation of geothermal springs in Erzurum, East Anatolia (Turkey)10.1007/s12665-018-7986-1 ↗
17. Hybrid artificial neural network based on a metaheuristic optimization algorithm for the prediction of reservoir temperature using hydrogeochemical data of different geothermal areas in Anatolia (Turkey)10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102476 ↗
18. Estimation of static formation temperatures in geothermal wells by using an artificial neural network approach10.1016/j.cageo.2010.01.006 ↗
19. Modeling of a direct expansion geothermal heat pump using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.040 ↗
20. Artificial neural networks for the generation of geothermal maps of ground temperature at various depths by considering land configuration10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.045 ↗
21. Machine learning enhancement of thermal response tests for geothermal potential evaluations at site and regional scales10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102132 ↗
22. Machine learning-based performance prediction for ground source heat pump systems10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102509 ↗
23. Predicting the geothermal heat flux in Greenland: A machine learning approach
24. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of deep reservoir temperatures using the gas-phase composition of geothermal fluids10.1016/j.cageo.2019.05.004 ↗
25. Feed-forward neural network training using sparse representation10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.038 ↗
26. Orr, M.J. (1996). Introduction to Radial Basis Function Networks, University of Edinburgh.
27. Bark texture classification using improved local ternary patterns and multilayer neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113509 ↗
28. DCS-ELM: A novel method for extreme learning machine for regression problems and a new approach for the SFRSCC10.7717/peerj-cs.411 ↗
29. Evolving neural networks using bird swarm algorithm for data classification and regression applications10.1007/s10586-019-02913-5 ↗
30. Liao, J., Asteris, P.G., Cavaleri, L., Mohammed, A.S., Lemonis, M.E., Tsoukalas, M.Z., Skentou, A.D., Maraveas, C., Koopialipoor, M., and Armaghani, D.J. (2021). Novel fuzzy-based optimization approaches for the prediction of ultimate axial load of circular concrete-filled steel tubes. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11120629 ↗
31. Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm10.1007/s00500-016-2442-1 ↗
32. Heidari, A.A., Faris, H., Mirjalili, S., Aljarah, I., and Mafarja, M. (2020). Nature-Inspired Optimizers, Springer.
33. Zubaidi, S.L., Abdulkareem, I.H., Hashim, K.S., Al-Bugharbee, H., Ridha, H.M., Gharghan, S.K., Al-Qaim, F.F., Muradov, M., Kot, P., and Al-Khaddar, R. (2020). Hybridised artificial neural network model with slime mould algorithm: A novel methodology for prediction of urban stochastic water demand. Water, 12.10.3390/w12102692 ↗
34. Adaptive opposition slime mould algorithm10.1007/s00500-021-06140-2 ↗
35. Hydrogeochemical characteristics and conceptual model of Çamlıdere low temperature geothermal prospect, northern Central Anatolia10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.01.004 ↗
36. Hydrogeochemistry of geothermal waters in eastern Turkey: Geochemical and isotopic constraints on water-rock interaction10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106708 ↗
37. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic study of thermal and mineralized waters from the Nevşehir (Kozakli) area, Central Turkey10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.03.003 ↗
38. Hydrogeochemical study of the Terme and Karakurt thermal and mineralized waters from Kirşehir Area, central Turkey10.1007/s12665-011-1217-3 ↗
39. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic characteristics of Kavak (Seydişehir-Konya) geothermal field, Turkey10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.05.019 ↗
40. A new approach for prediction of the wear loss of PTA surface coatings using artificial neural network and basic, kernel-based, and weighted extreme learning machine10.1007/s40544-017-0340-0 ↗
41. Fire resistance prediction of slim-floor asymmetric steel beams using single hidden layer ANN models that employ multiple activation functions
42. Optimal design and size of a desiccant cooling system with onsite energy generation and thermal storage using a multilayer perceptron neural network and a genetic algorithm10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.020 ↗
43. The whale optimization algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
44. Gerçek Dünya Mühendislik Tasarım Problemlerinin Çözümünde Kullanılan Metasezgisel Optimizasyon Algoritmalarının Performanslarının İncelenmesi
45. The ant lion optimizer10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010 ↗
46. Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
47. Chaotic slime mould optimization algorithm for global optimization10.1007/s10462-021-10100-5 ↗
48. A new strategy based on slime mould algorithm to extract the optimal model parameters of solar PV panel
49. Prediction of wear loss quantities of ferro-alloy coating using different machine learning algorithms10.1007/s40544-018-0249-z ↗
50. Predicting reservoir temperature of geothermal systems in Western Anatolia, Turkey: A focus on predictive performance and explainability of machine learning models10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102727 ↗
51. Research on water temperature prediction based on improved support vector regression10.1007/s00521-020-04836-4 ↗