Finite Element Models to Predict the Risk of Aseptic Loosening in Cementless Femoral Stems: A Literature Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Aseptic loosening is the most common failure mode for total hip arthroplasty, and the design of the implant plays a significant role in influencing the longevity and stability of the implant. Finite Element (FE) models have been demonstrated to be powerful numerical tools that allow for generating information supporting the device’s safety and/or efficacy during pre-clinical assessment. Different authors have proposed FE studies aiming to simulate the long-term stability of the femoral stem; however, multiple improvements are still necessary for translating computational methodologies into clinical practice. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modelling procedures for predicting aseptic loosening risk, focusing on cementless femoral stems. The main modelling assumptions, including bone and implant geometry, materials, boundary conditions, and bone–implant interface contact, were summarised and presented. The limitations of various modelling assumptions and their impact on the simulation results were also discussed. The analysis suggests that more rigorous clinical validation for osseointegration models and failure criteria used to determine loosening of the implant should be clearly defined, and efforts should be made to identify the appropriate limit of tolerable conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Funding
European Commission through the H2020 project “In Silico World: Lowering barriers to ubiquitous adoption of In Silico Trials” · National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) · European Union—NextGenerationEU—Project Title “IST4HR—In Silico Trials for Hip Replacements” · Italian Ministry of Ministry of University and Research (MUR)
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. International Survey of Primary and Revision Total Knee Replacement10.1007/s00264-011-1235-5 ↗
2. Mapping Existing Hip and Knee Replacement Registries in Europe10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.010 ↗
3. Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020–2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample10.3899/jrheum.170990 ↗
4. Projections of Primary TKA and THA in Germany from 2016 through 204010.1097/CORR.0000000000001214 ↗
5. Cementless Total Hip Replacement: Past, Present, and Future10.1007/s00776-008-1317-4 ↗
6. Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There Evidence That Cementless Fixation Is Better?10.2106/JBJS.K.01652 ↗
7. (2022, May 13). Report of RIPO Overall Data on Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty in Emilia Romagna Region (Italy, 2000–2019). Available online: https://ripo.cineca.it/authzssl/pdf/Annual%20report%202019%20RIPO%20Register_v2.pdf.
8. (2023). National Joint Registry 20th Annual Report 2023, Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd.
9. Revision Primary Total Hip Replacement: Causes and Risk Factors
10. Revision Surgery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Complication-Based Analysis Using Worldwide Arthroplasty Registers10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012 ↗
11. Hip Replacement10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X ↗
12. Diagnosis and Detection of Subtle Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.060 ↗
13. Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?10.1007/s11999.0000000000000208 ↗
14. Which Implant Should We Use for Primary Total Hip Replacement? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.2106/JBJS.N.00397 ↗
15. Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register10.1302/0301-620X.77B1.7822364 ↗
16. Mid-Term Results After 517 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties With a Shortened and Shoulderless Double-Taper Press-Fit Stem: High Rates of Aseptic Loosening10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.004 ↗
17. The Effect of Size for a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Cementless Implant on Component Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 41,265 Stems10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.060 ↗
18. Graudejus, O., Ponce Wong, R., Varghese, N., Wagner, S., and Morrison, B. (2018). Bridging the Gap between in Vivo and in Vitro Research: Reproducing in Vitro the Mechanical and Electrical Environment of Cells in Vivo. Front. Cell. Neurosci., 12.10.3389/conf.fncel.2018.38.00069 ↗
19. The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation10.1017/S0963180115000079 ↗
20. Pre-Clinical Validation of Joint Prostheses: A Systematic Approach10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.02.005 ↗
21. Four Decades of Finite Element Analysis of Orthopaedic Devices: Where Are We Now and What Are the Opportunities?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.019 ↗
22. Accounting for Patient Variability in Finite Element Analysis of the Intact and Implanted Hip and Knee: A Review10.1002/cnm.2530 ↗
23. Possible Contexts of Use for In Silico Trials Methodologies: A Consensus-Based Review10.1109/JBHI.2021.3090469 ↗
24. In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry: From Fantasy to Reality?10.1007/s10439-021-02787-y ↗
25. Patient-Specific Modelling of Bone and Bone-Implant Systems: The Challenges10.1002/cnm.2536 ↗
26. A Model of Bone Adaptation as a Topology Optimization Process with Contact10.4236/jbise.2012.55030 ↗
27. A Comparative Assessment of Two Designs of Hip Stem Using Rule-Based Simulation of Combined Osseointegration and Remodelling10.1177/0954411919890998 ↗
28. Balancing Incompatible Endoprosthetic Design Goals: A Combined Ingrowth and Bone Remodeling Simulation10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.005 ↗
29. Effect of the Initial Implant Fitting on the Predicted Secondary Stability of a Cementless Stem10.1007/BF02344635 ↗
30. Influence of Femoral Stem Geometry, Material and Extent of Porous Coating on Bone Ingrowth and Atrophy in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Iterative Finite Element Model10.1080/10255840802546754 ↗
31. A Contact Model with Ingrowth Control for Bone Remodelling around Cementless Stems10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00204-4 ↗
32. On the Optimal Shape of Hip Implants10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.038 ↗
33. Influence of Functionally Graded Pores on Bone Ingrowth in Cementless Hip Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study Using Mechano-Regulatory Algorithm10.1007/s10237-017-0987-2 ↗
34. Computational Assessment of Growth of Connective Tissues around Textured Hip Stem Subjected to Daily Activities after THA10.1007/s11517-022-02729-3 ↗
35. Tissue Differentiation around a Short Stemmed Metaphyseal Loading Implant Employing a Modified Mechanoregulatory Algorithm: A Finite Element Study10.1002/jor.21305 ↗
36. Ghosh, R., Chanda, S., and Chakraborty, D. (2020). The Influence of Macro-Textural Designs over Implant Surface on Bone on-Growth: A Computational Mechanobiology Based Study. Comput. Biol. Med., 124.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103937 ↗
37. A Comprehensive Analysis of Bio-Inspired Design of Femoral Stem on Primary and Secondary Stabilities Using Mechanoregulatory Algorithm10.1007/s10237-020-01334-3 ↗
38. Modelling the Mechanical Behaviour of Living Bony Interfaces10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.020 ↗
39. Influence of Sequential Opening/Closing of Interface Gaps and Texture Density on Bone Growth over Macro-Textured Implant Surfaces Using FE Based Mechanoregulatory Algorithm10.1080/10255842.2021.1994960 ↗
40. Biphasic Constitutive Laws for Biological Interface Evolution10.1007/s10237-002-0024-x ↗
41. Toward a Method to Simulate the Process of Bone Ingrowth in Cementless THA Using Finite Element Method10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.10.010 ↗
42. Numerical Model to Predict the Longterm Mechanical Stability of Cementless Orthopaedic Implants10.1007/BF02345207 ↗
43. Finite Element Models in Tissue Mechanics and Orthopaedic Implant Design10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00018-1 ↗
44. Ghosh, R., Chanda, S., and Chakraborty, D. (2022). Application of Finite Element Analysis to Tissue Differentiation and Bone Remodelling Approaches and Their Use in Design Optimization of Orthopaedic Implants: A Review. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng., 38.10.1002/cnm.3637 ↗
45. Physiological reactions in the interface between cementless implants and bone
46. Does Preclinical Analysis Based on Static Loading Underestimate Post-Surgery Stem Micromotion in THA as Opposed to Dynamic Gait Loading?10.1007/s11517-023-02801-6 ↗
47. A Mechanobiological Model for Tissue Differentiation That Includes Angiogenesis: A Lattice-Based Modeling Approach10.1007/s10439-008-9594-9 ↗
48. Bone Ingrowth into a Porous Coated Implant Predicted by a Mechano-Regulatory Tissue Differentiation Algorithm10.1007/s10237-007-0100-3 ↗
49. Estimation of Muscle Forces and Joint Moments Using a Forward-Inverse Dynamics Model10.1249/01.mss.0000176684.24008.6f ↗
50. A Computational Approach on the Osseointegration of Bone Implants Based on a Bio-Active Interface Theory10.1002/gamm.200910015 ↗
51. Mathai, B., and Gupta, S. (2021). Bone Ingrowth Around an Uncemented Femoral Implant Using Mechanoregulatory Algorithm: A Multiscale Finite Element Analysis. J. Biomech. Eng., 144.10.1115/1.4052227 ↗
52. Numerical Investigations on the Osseointegration of Uncemented Endoprostheses Based on Bio-Active Interface Theory10.1007/s00466-011-0635-0 ↗
53. An Improved Method for the Automatic Mapping of Computed Tomography Numbers onto Finite Element Models10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00138-3 ↗
54. Viceconti, M., Casali, M., Massari, B., Cristofolini, L., Bassini, S., and Toni, A. (1996). The “standardized Femur Program” Proposal for a Reference Geometry to Be Used for the Creation of Finite Element Models of the Femur. J. Biomech., 29.10.1016/0021-9290(95)00164-6 ↗
55. Preprocessing and Postprocessing for Materials Based on the Homogenization Method with Adaptive Finite Element Methods10.1016/0045-7825(90)90148-F ↗
56. (1980). Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory, Springer. Lecture Notes in Physics.
57. Large-Sliding Contact Elements Accurately Predict Levels of Bone–Implant Micromotion Relevant to Osseointegration10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8 ↗
58. Asymptotic Homogenisation in Linear Elasticity. Part II: Finite Element Procedures and Multiscale Applications10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.01.027 ↗
59. Design of a Composite Hip Femoral Prosthesis10.1016/j.matdes.2004.07.024 ↗
60. (2024, March 31). ISO 7206-8:1995. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/21009.html.
61. (2024, March 31). ISO 7206-4:2010. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/42769.html.
62. Hip Contact Forces and Gait Patterns from Routine Activities10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9 ↗
63. Determination of Muscle Loading at the Hip Joint for Use in Pre-Clinical Testing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.022 ↗
64. Musculo-Skeletal Loading Conditions at the Hip during Walking and Stair Climbing10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00039-2 ↗
65. Pelvic Muscle and Acetabular Contact Forces during Gait10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00041-9 ↗
66. Kuiper, J.H. (1993). Numerical Optimization of Artificial Hip Joint Designs. [Ph.D. Thesis, Katholieke Universitcit Nijmegen].
67. Effects of Porous Coating, with and without Collar Support, on Early Relative Motion for a Cementless Hip Prosthesis10.1016/0021-9290(93)90087-U ↗
68. In Vivo Skeletal Responses to Porous-Surfaced Implants Subjected to Small Induced Motions10.2106/00004623-199705000-00010 ↗
69. Timing of Loading and Effect of Micromotion on Bone-Dental Implant Interface: Review of Experimental Literature10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
70. Micromotion of Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Components10.1302/0301-620X.73B1.1991771 ↗
71. Mechanical Regulation of Localized and Appositional Bone Formation around Bone-Interfacing Implants10.1002/1097-4636(200104)55:1<63::AID-JBM90>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
72. Computation of Static-Equivalent Load Sets for Bone Remodeling Simulation10.1002/pamm.200700235 ↗
73. Adaptive Bone-Remodeling Theory Applied to Prosthetic-Design Analysis10.1016/0021-9290(87)90030-3 ↗
74. Comparison of Biophysical Stimuli for Mechano-Regulation of Tissue Differentiation during Fracture Healing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.037 ↗
75. Even a Thin Layer of Soft Tissue May Compromise the Primary Stability of Cementless Hip Stems10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00052-3 ↗
76. A Mechano-Regulation Model for Tissue Differentiation during Fracture Healing: Analysis of Gap Size and Loading10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00086-6 ↗
77. Correlations between Mechanical Stress History and Tissue Differentiation in Initial Fracture Healing10.1002/jor.1100060517 ↗
78. Asymptotic Analysis of Mohr-Coulomb and Drucker-Prager Soft Thin Layers10.12989/scs.2004.4.2.133 ↗
79. Mechanical Signaling for Bone Modeling and Remodeling10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i4.50 ↗
80. Bone Remodeling10.1196/annals.1365.035 ↗
81. Feyzi, M., Fallahnezhad, K., Taylor, M., and Hashemi, R. (2021). A Review on the Finite Element Simulation of Fretting Wear and Corrosion in the Taper Junction of Hip Replacement Implants. Comput. Biol. Med., 130.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104196 ↗
82. ASME (2018). V&V 40—2018: Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling through Verification and Validation: Application to Medical Devices, ASME.
83. Ultra-Short Stems with Proximal Load Transfer: Clinical and Radiographic Results at Five-Year Follow-Up
84. The Limit of Tolerable Micromotion for Implant Osseointegration: A Systematic Review10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5 ↗