Numerical and Analytical Determination of Rockburst Characteristics: Case Study from Polish Deep Copper Mine
Source abstract
Abstract
A simplified analytical method useful for ductile ground support design in underground mine workings is presented. This approach allows for maintaining the stability of sidewalls in rectangular openings extracted in competent and homogeneous rocks, especially in high-pressure conditions, favoring rockburst event occurrence. The proposed design procedure involves the typical assumptions governing the limit equilibrium method (LEM) with respect to a triangular rock block expelled from a sidewall of a long mine excavation subjected to normal stresses of the values determined based on the Maugis’s analytical solution concerned with stress distribution around the elliptical opening extracted within the homogeneous infinite elastic space. This stage of the local assessment of rock susceptibility to ejection from the walls of the excavation allowed for determining the geometry of the block whose ejection is most likely in a given geological and mining situation. Having extensive information about the geometry of the excavations and the properties of the surrounding rocks, it was possible to make an exemplary map of the risk from rockburst hazard, developed as the 2D contours of safety indexes’ values, for special-purpose excavations such as heavy machinery chambers, main excavations, etc. in conditions of selected mining panel of the deep copper mine at Legnica-Głogów Copper Basin, Poland. Another important element of the obtained results is the calculated values of the horizontal forces potentially pushing out the predetermined rock blocks. These forces are the surplus over the potential of frictional resistance and cohesion on the surfaces of previously identified discontinuities or on new cracks appearing as a result of overloading of the sidewalls. Finally, the presented algorithm allows us to perform quantitative tracking of rockburst phenomena as a function of time by determination of acceleration, velocity, and displacement of expelled rocks. Such information may be useful at the stage of designing the support for underground workings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KGHM CUPRUM Ltd., Research & Development Centre, 53-659 Wrocław, Poland
Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-421 Wrocław, Poland
Funding
European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. A Critical Review on the Developments of Rock Support Systems in High Stress Ground Conditions10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.06.002 ↗
2. The Effect of Selected Rockburst Prevention Measures on Seismic Activity—Case Study from the Rudna Copper Mine
3. Challenges for Science: The Exploitation of Deep Deposits10.1051/e3sconf/20187100008 ↗
4. Use of Neural Networks to Forecast Seismic Hazard Expressed by Number of Tremors per Unit of Surface10.1007/s00024-020-02602-0 ↗
5. Back-Analysis for Initial Ground Stress Field at a Diamond Mine Using Machine Learning Approaches10.1007/s11069-020-04304-1 ↗
6. Blake, W., and Hedley, D.G.F. (2003). Rockbursts: Case Studies from North American Hard-Rock Mines, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.
7. Coal Bursts in the Deep Longwall Mines of the United States10.1007/s40789-016-0102-9 ↗
8. A Rockburst Intensity Criterion Based on the Geological Strength Index, Experiences Learned from a Deep Tunnel10.1007/s10064-020-01774-2 ↗
9. Effect of Joint Density on Rockburst Proneness of the Elastic-Brittle-Plastic Rock Mass10.1155/2021/5574325 ↗
10. Numerical Modeling for Rockbursts: A State-of-the-Art Review10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.09.011 ↗
11. A Comprehensive Geomechanical Method for the Assessment of Rockburst Hazards in Underground Mining10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.04.009 ↗
12. Evaluation Method of Rockburst: State-of-the-Art Literature Review10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.029 ↗
13. A New Empirical Chart for Rockburst Analysis in Tunnelling: Tunnel Rockburst Classification (TRC)10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.03.010 ↗
14. The Seismic Source Parameters of Tremors Provoked by Long-Hole Destress Blasting Executed During the Longwall Mining of a Coal Seam Under Variable Stress Conditions10.1007/s00024-020-02603-z ↗
15. Estimation of Active Rockburst Prevention Effectiveness during Longwall Mining under Disadvantageous Geological and Mining Conditions10.1016/j.jsm.2016.04.003 ↗
16. Tannant, D.D., McDowell, G.M., Brummer, R.K., and Kaiser, P.K. (1993). Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines 93, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium, Kingston, ON, Canada, 16–18 August 1993, Balkema.
17. A Review of Rockburst: Experiments, Theories, and Simulations10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.014 ↗
18. Estimation of Rockburst Wall-Rock Velocity Invoked by Slab Flexure Sources in Deep Tunnels10.1139/cgj-2013-0337 ↗
19. The Shear Strength of Rock and Rock Joints10.1016/0148-9062(76)90003-6 ↗
20. Extending Empirical Evidence through Numerical Modelling in Rock Engineering Design
21. Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470172766 ↗
22. A Limit Equilibrium Fracture Zone Model to Investigate Seismicity in Coal Mines10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.08.003 ↗
23. Sengani, F., and Mulenga, F. (2020). Application of Limit Equilibrium Analysis and Numerical Modeling in a Case of Slope Instability. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12218870 ↗
24. Ohnishi, Y., Nishiyama, S., and Sasaki, T. (2006). Rock Mechanics in Underground Construction, World Scientific.
25. Explicit Dynamic DDA Method Considering Dynamic Contact Force
26. Discontinuous Deformation Analysis for SH-Body10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103234 ↗
27. Tunnel Stability Assessment by 3D DDA-Key Block Analysis10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.015 ↗
28. Stability Analysis of Underground Surrounding Rock Mass Based on Block Theory10.1007/s11771-020-4527-3 ↗
29. Hoek, E. (2023, July 21). Practical Rock Engineering. RocScience. Available online: http://www.rocscience.com/hoek/PracticalRockEngineering.asp.
30. Billaux, D., Detournay, C., Hart, R., and Rachez, X. (2020). FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics 2001, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003077527 ↗
31. Khabbaz, H., Fatahi, B., and Nucifora, C. (2012). Proceedings of the 11th Australia—New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics—Ground Engineering in a Changing World (ANZ 2012), Melbourne, Australia, 14–18 July 2012, New Zealand Geotechnical Society.
32. Rockburst mechanics
33. Rockburst Hazard Assessment in Bedded Rock Mass: Laboratory Tests of Rock Samples and Numerical Calculations
34. Fulawka, K., Szumny, M., Pytel, W., and Mertuszka, P. (2020, January 4–8). Conceptual Design of Underground Laboratory under Dynamic Load Condition in Deep Copper Mine. Proceedings of the 22nd EGU General Assembly, Online.10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-4437 ↗
35. Fulawka, K., Pytel, W., Mertuszka, P., and Szumny, M. (2021, January 19–30). Finite Element Method-Based Geomechanical Risk Assessment of Underground Laboratory Located in the Deep Copper Mine. Proceedings of the 23rd EGU General Assembly, Online.10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7682 ↗
36. Stresses and Displacements around Cracks and Elliptical Cavities: Exact Solutions10.1016/0013-7944(92)90123-V ↗
37. A closed-form elastic solution for stresses and displacements around tunnels10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00079-5 ↗
38. A semi-analytical elastic solution for stress field of lined non-circular tunnels at great depth using complex variable mrthod10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.038 ↗
39. A novel complex variable solution for the stress and displacement fields around a shallow non-circular tunnel10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105797 ↗
40. RocSciecnce (2023, September 21). RS2 Finite Element Analysis for Excavations—Rocscience. Available online: https://www.rocscience.com/rocscience/products/rs2.
41. Empirical Estimation of Rock Mass Modulus10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005 ↗
42. NEi Software (NEi Nastran Reference Manual, 2009). NEi Nastran Reference Manual, Version 9.2.
43. Ortlepp, W.D. (1992, January 16–19). The Design of Support for the Containment of Rockburst Damage in Tunnels—An Engineering Approach. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
44. Nussbaumer, M.M. (2000). A Comprehensive Review on Rock Burst. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
45. Pytel, W. (2012). Geomechanical Problems of Ground Support Selection for Mine Excavations, KGHM Cuprum. (In Polish).
46. Lasocki, S., Orlecka-Sikora, B., Mutke, G., Pytel, W., Rudzinski, L., Markowski, P., and Piasecki, P. (2017, January 15–17). A catastrophic event in Rudna copper-ore mine in Poland on 29 November, 2016: What, how and why. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, RaSiM9, Santiago, Chile.