journal article·2023-10-17Open access

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Bayesian Optimized CNN Gengma Seismic Zone Considering InSAR Deformation

Yunlong Deng, Xiaoqing Zuo, Yongfa Li, Xincheng Zhou

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 20

Abstract

Landslides are one of the most common geological disasters in China, characterized by suddenness and uncertainty. Traditional methods are not sufficient for the accurate identification, early warning, and forecasting of landslide disasters. As high-resolution remote sensing satellites and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) surface deformation monitoring technology have been leaping forward, the traditional methods of landslide monitoring data sources are limited, and there have been few effective methods to excavate the characteristics of the spatial distribution of landslide hazards and their triggering factors, etc. In this study, an area extending 10 km from the VII isobar of the Gengma earthquake was taken as the study area, and 13 evaluation factors were screened out by integrating the factors of InSAR surface deformation, topography, and geological environment. Landslide susceptibility was evaluated through the Bayesian optimized convolutional neural network (BO-CNN), and the Bayesian optimized random forests (BO-RF) and particle swarm optimization support vector machines (PSO-SVM) models were selected for comparative analyses. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by using three indices, including the ROC curve, the AUC value, and the FR value. Specifically, the ROC curves of PSO-SVM, BO-RF, and BO-CNN were close to the upper-left corner, indicating excellent model performance. Moreover, the AUC values were computed as 0.9388, 0.9529, and 0.9535, respectively, and the FR value of landslides in the high susceptibility area of BO-CNN reached up to 14.9 and exceeded those of PSO-SVM and BO-RF, respectively. Furthermore, the mentioned values of the SVM and BO-RF models were 4.55 and 3.69 higher. The experimental results indicated that, compared with other models, the BO-CNN model used in this study had a better effect on landslide susceptibility evaluation, and the research results are of great significance to the disaster prevention and mitigation measures of local governments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Cryospheric studies and observations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Rainfall erosivity as an indicator of sliding occurrence along the southern slopes of the Bačka loess plateau: A case study of the Kula settlement, Vojvodina (North Serbia)
2. Factors triggering landslide occurrence on the Zemun loess plateau, Belgrade area, Serbia10.1007/s12665-018-7712-z ↗
3. A coupled slope cutting—A prolonged rainfall-induced loess landslide: A 17 October 2011 case study10.1007/s10064-014-0645-1 ↗
4. Distribution and characteristics of landslide in Loess Plateau: A case study in Shaanxi province10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.001 ↗
5. Morar, C., Lukić, T., Basarin, B., Valjarević, A., Vujičić, M., Niemets, L., Telebienieva, I., Boros, L., and Nagy, G. (2021). Shaping Sustainable Urban Environments by Addressing the Hydro-Meteorological Factors in Landslide Occurrence: Ciuperca Hill (Oradea, Romania). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18095022 ↗
6. Chi, T., and Su, Y. (1995). Integrated System for Remote Sensing Monitoring and Assessment of Major Natural Disasters, China Science and Technology Press.
7. Moretto, S., Bozzano, F., Esposito, C., Mazzanti, P., and Rocca, A. (2017). Assessment of landslide pre-failure monitoring and forecasting using satellite SAR interferometry. Geosciences, 7.10.3390/geosciences7020036 ↗
8. Tzouvaras, M., Danezis, C., and Hadjimitsis, D.G. (2020). Small scale landslide detection using Sentinel-1 interferometric SAR coherence. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12101560 ↗
9. Tzouvaras, M. (2021). Statistical Time-Series Analysis of Interferometric Coherence from Sentinel-1 Sensors for Landslide Detection and Early Warning. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21206799 ↗
10. Wasowski, J., Bovenga, F., Casarano, D., Nutricato, R., and Refice, A. (December, January 28). Application of PSI techniques to landslide investigations in the Caramanico area (Italy): Lessons learnt. Proceedings of the Fringe 2005 Workshop; Application of PSI Techniques to Landslide Investigations in the Caramanico Area (Italy), Frascati, Italy.
11. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007 ↗
12. A study of landslide distribution in loess area with InSAR
13. Combination of GNSS, satellite InSAR, and GBInSAR remote sensing monitoring to improve the understanding of a large landslide in high alpine environment10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.014 ↗
14. Early Identification of serious geological hazards with integrated remote sensing technologies:thoughts and recommendations
15. Manconi, A., Kourkouli, P., Caduff, R., Strozzi, T., and Loew, S. (2018). Monitoring Surface Deformation over a Failing Rock Slope with the ESA Sentinels: Insights from Moosfluh Instability, Swiss Alps. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10050672 ↗
16. Tzouvaras, M., Danezis, C., and Hadjimitsis, D.G. (2020). Differential SAR Interferometry Using Sentinel-1 Imagery-Limitations in Monitoring Fast Moving Landslides: The Case Study of Cyprus. Geosciences, 10.10.3390/geosciences10060236 ↗
17. Integrated space-air-ground early detection, Monitoring and warming system for potentianl catastrophic geohazards
18. Slope stability state monitoringandn updating of the outang landslide, Three gorges area with time series InSAR analysis
19. Combining application of TOPS and scanSAR InSAR in large-scale geohazards identification
20. Detection and monitoring of post-earthquake landslides in jiuzhaigou using radar remote sensing
21. Active landslides detection in Zhouqu county, gansu province using InSAR technology
22. Landslide detection of the jinsha river region using GACOS assisted InSAR stacking
23. Detection and monitoring of potential landslides along Minjiang river valley in maoxian county, sichuan using radar remote sensing
24. Early identification of landslide hazards in deep-cut alpine canyon using SBAS-InSAR technology
25. He, J., Ju, N., Xie, M., Wen, Y., Zuo, M., and Deng, M. (2023). Comparison of InSAR technology for identification of hidden dangers of geological hazards in alpine and canyon areas. Earth Sci., 1–20.
26. Jiang, Z., Zhao, C., Yan, M., Wang, B., and Liu, X. (2022). The Early Identification and Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Loess Landslides with SENTINEL-1A Datasets: A Case of Dingbian County, China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14236009 ↗
27. Landslide susceptibility evaluation based on information value model and machine learning method: A case study of lixian county, sichuan province
28. Combined selection of susceptibility assessment factors for Jiuzhaigou earthquake-induced landslides
29. Comparison of landslide susceptibility assessment models in Zhenkang County, Yunnan Province, China
30. Study on development patterns and susceptibility evaluation of coseismic landslides within mountainous regions Influenced by strong earthquakes
31. Landslide susceptibility mapping using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) and geographically weighted logistic regression (GWLR) models in the Río Aguas catchment (Almería, SE Spain)10.1007/s11069-023-05857-7 ↗
32. Huang, W., Ding, M., Li, Z., Zhuang, J., Yang, J., Li, X., Meng, L., Zhang, H., and Dong, Y. (2022). An Efficient User-Friendly Integration Tool for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Support Vector Machines: SVM-LSM Toolbox. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14143408 ↗
33. Landslide susceptibility assessment along the Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor based on layer adaptive weighted convolutional neural network
34. Stacking ensemble of machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Zhangjiajie City, Hunan Province, China10.1007/s12665-022-10723-z ↗
35. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility in chinese loess plateau based on IV-RF and IV-CNN coupling models
36. Landslide Susceptibility Spatial Modelling Using Random Forest Algorithm: A Case Study of Malang Regency10.1088/1755-1315/1127/1/012026 ↗
37. Gui, J., Alejano, L., Yao, M., Zhao, F., and Chen, W. (2023). GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Modeling: A Comparison between Best-First Decision Tree and Its Two Ensembles ( BagBFT and RFBFT). Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041007 ↗
38. Landslide susceptibility mapping using automatically constructed CNN architectures with pre-slide topographic DEM of deep-seated catastrophic landslides caused by Typhoon Talas10.1007/s11069-023-05862-w ↗
39. Landslide susceptibility modelling using the quantitative random forest method along the northern portion of the Yukon Alaska Highway Corridor, Canada10.1007/s11069-017-3104-z ↗
40. Landslide susceptibility modeling using different artificial intelligence methods: A case study at Muong Lay district, Vietnam10.1080/10106049.2019.1665715 ↗
41. Application of Bayesian Hyperparameter Optimized Random Forest and XGBoost Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping10.3389/feart.2021.712240 ↗
42. Comparison of LR, 5-CV SVM, GA SVM, and PSO SVM for landslide susceptibility assessment in Tibetan Plateau area, China10.1007/s11629-022-7685-y ↗
43. A Landslide susceptibility assessment method using SMOTE and convolutional neural network
44. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 ↗
45. Rapid Mapping of Landslides on SAR Data by Attention U-Net10.3390/rs14061449 ↗
46. Ghorbanzadeh, O., Meena, R.S., Blaschke, T., and Aryal, J. (2019). UAV-Based Slope Failure Detection Using Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11172046 ↗
47. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
48. Pattern recognition using generalized portrait method
49. Vapnik, V. (2000). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
50. Correction to: Integrating the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) with machine learning methods for improving the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility model10.1007/s12145-022-00892-7 ↗
51. Study on the distribution pattern of geologic hazards in Gengma County, Yunnan Province
52. Improving landslide hazard and risk mapping in Guatemala using terrain aspect10.1007/s11069-015-2109-8 ↗
53. Study on the correlation between topographic features and distribution of land use types in Jinggang Mountain
54. Analysis of topographic differences of yongshou county based on different resolutions of DEM
55. Xiao, B., Zhao, J., Li, D., Zhao, Z., Zhou, D., Xi, W., and Li, Y. (2022). Combined SBAS-InSAR and PSO-RF Algorithm for Evaluating the Susceptibility Prediction of Landslide in Complex Mountainous Area: A Case Study of Ludian County, China. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22208041 ↗
56. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on landslide classification and weighted frequency ratio model
57. Aleksova, B., Lukić, T., Milevski, I., Spalević, V., and Marković, S.B. (2023). Modelling Water Erosion and Mass Movements (Wet) by Using GIS-Based Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Assessment Approaches: A Case Study—Kratovska Reka Catchment (North Macedonia). Atmosphere, 14.10.3390/atmos14071139 ↗