journal article·2023-10-06Open access

Development of Prediction Method for Dimensional Stability of 3D-Printed Objects

Kyung-Eun Min, Jae-Won Jang, Jesik Shin, Cheolhee Kim, Sung Yi

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM), as one of the additive manufacturing processes, is known for strong layer adhesion suitable for prototypes and end-use items. This study used a multiple regression model and statistical analysis to explore the dimensional accuracy of FDM objects. Factors such as inclination angle, layer thickness, support space, and raster angle were examined. Machine learning models (Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)) predicted dimensions using 81 datapoints. The mean squared dimensional error (MSDE) between the measured and designed surface profiles was selected as an output for the dimensional accuracy. Support spacing, layer thickness, and raster angle were determined to be statistically significant, and all factors were confirmed as significant predictors. The coefficients of determination for multiple linear regression, GPR, SVM, and ANN models were 76%, 98%, 93%, and 99%, respectively. The mean absolute errors (MAEs)—errors between the measured and the predicted MSDEs—were 0.020 mm and 0.034 mm, respectively, for GPR and SVM models. The MAEs for ANN models were 0.0055 mm for supporting cases and 2.1468 × 10−5 mm for non-supporting cases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA

Welding and Joining R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 156 Getbeol-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Institute of Industrial Technology as “Development of root technology for multi-product flexible production

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. On the additive manufacturing (3D printing) of viscoelastic materials and flow behavior: From composites to food manufacturing
2. Ajinjeru, C., Kishore, V., Liu, P., Hassen, A.A., Lindahl, J., Kunc, V., and Duty, C. (2017). International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin.
3. Pelayo, F., Blanco, D., Fernandez, P., Gonzalez, J., and Beltran, N. (2021). Viscoelastic Behaviour of Flexible Thermoplastic Polyurethane Additively Manufactured Parts: Influence of Inner-Structure Design Factors. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13142365 ↗
4. Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing10.1002/adfm.202003062 ↗
5. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
6. Scaffold characteristics, fabrication methods, and biomaterials for the bone tissue engineering10.1007/s12541-022-00755-7 ↗
7. Materials for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
8. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
9. Optimization of electrohydrodynamic writing technique to print collagen10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00154.x ↗
10. Processing and properties of glass bead particulate-filled functionally graded Nylon-11 composites produced by selective laser sintering10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.112 ↗
11. Functionally graded Nylon-11/silica nanocomposites produced by selective laser sintering10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.082 ↗
12. Mechanical and microstructural properties of polycaprolactone scaffolds with one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional orthogonally oriented porous architectures produced by selective laser sintering10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.002 ↗
13. Direct metal printing of 3D electrical circuit using rapid prototyping
14. Functional prototype development of multi-layer board (MLB) using rapid prototyping technology10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.223 ↗
15. Additive manufacturing technologies: An overview of challenges and perspective of using electrospraying10.1080/20550324.2018.1558499 ↗
16. Additive manufacturing: Current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations10.1115/1.4028725 ↗
17. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
18. Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process10.1007/s00170-010-2882-1 ↗
19. Saqib, S., and Urbanic, J. (2012). Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability, Springer.
20. Dimensional accuracy of FDM-printed polymer parts10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0115 ↗
21. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.008 ↗
22. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
23. Machine learning with big data: Challenges and approaches10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2696365 ↗
24. Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in materials science10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010015 ↗
25. Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence and machine learning: A literature review
26. Min, K.-E., Jang, J.-W., Kim, J.-K., Yi, S., and Kim, C. (2022). Prediction of Curing Time/Shear Strength of Non-Conductive Adhesives Using a Neural Network Model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312150 ↗
27. Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030 ↗
28. Modeling, analysis, and optimization of dimensional accuracy of FDM-fabricated parts using definitive screening design and deep learning feedforward artificial neural network10.1007/s40436-020-00336-9 ↗
29. Ali, A., Riaz, R.D., Malik, U.J., Abbas, S.B., Usman, M., Shah, M.U., Kim, I.-H., Hanif, A., and Faizan, M. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Tensile and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Concrete. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16114149 ↗
30. Cheng, B., and Chou, K. (2014, January 8–12). Deformation evaluation of part overhang configurations in electron beam additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Charlotte, NC, USA.10.1115/MSEC2015-9477 ↗
31. Optimization of 3D-printer process parameters for improving quality of polylactic acid printed part10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i2/170902044 ↗
32. The influence of in-plane raster angle on tensile and fracture strengths of 3D-printed PLA specimens10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107225 ↗