journal article·2023-09-19Open access

Prediction of Sensor Data in a Greenhouse for Cultivation of Paprika Plants Using a Stacking Ensemble for Smart Farms

Seok-Ho Han, Husna Mutahira, Hoon-Seok Jang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 18

Abstract

Ensuring food security has become of paramount importance due to the rising global population. In particular, the agriculture sector in South Korea faces several challenges such as an aging farming population and a decline in the labor force. These issues have led to the recognition of smart farms as a potential solution. In South Korea, the smart farm is divided into three generations. The first generation primarily concentrates on monitoring and controlling precise cultivation environments by leveraging information and communication technologies (ICT). This is aimed at enhancing convenience for farmers. Moving on to the second generation, it takes advantage of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) to achieve improved productivity. This is achieved through precise cultivation management and automated control of various farming processes. The most advanced level is the 3rd generation, which represents an intelligent robotic farm. In this stage, the entire farming process is autonomously managed without the need for human intervention. This is made possible through energy management systems and the use of robots for various farm operations. However, in the current Korean context, the adoption of smart farms is primarily limited to the first generation, resulting in the limited utilization of advanced technologies such as AI, big data, and cloud computing. Therefore, this research aims to develop the second generation of smart farms within the first generation smart farm environment. To accomplish this, data was collected from nine sensors spanning the period between 20 June to 30 September. Following that, we conducted kernel density estimation analysis, data analysis, and correlation heatmap analysis based on the collected data. Subsequently, we utilized LSTM, BI-LSTM, and GRU as base models to construct a stacking ensemble model. To assess the performance of the proposed model based on the analyzed results, we utilized LSTM, BI-LSTM, and GRU as the existing models. As a result, the stacking ensemble model outperformed LSTM, BI-LSTM, and GRU in all performance metrics for predicting one of the sensor data variables, air temperature. However, this study collected nine sensor data over a relatively short period of three months. Therefore, there is a limitation in terms of considering the long-term data collection and analysis that accounts for the unique seasonal characteristics of Korea. Additionally, the challenge of including various environmental factors influencing crops beyond the nine sensors and conducting experiments in diverse cultivation environments with different crops for model generalization remains. In the future, we plan to address these limitations by extending the data collection period, acquiring diverse additional sensor data, and conducting further research that considers various environmental variables.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control · Smart Agriculture and AI · Remote Sensing in Agriculture

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IT Application Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Jeonju 54853, Republic of Korea

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP)

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Novel approaches and practices to sustainable agriculture
2. AgroLens: A low-cost and green-friendly Smart Farm Architecture to support real-time leaf disease diagnostics10.1016/j.iot.2022.100570 ↗
3. Factors affecting adoption of smart farms: The case of Korea10.1016/j.chb.2020.106309 ↗
4. Kim, S., Lee, M., and Shin, C. (2018). IoT-Based Strawberry Disease Prediction System for Smart Farming. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18114051 ↗
5. Son, K., Sim, H., Lee, J., and Lee, J. (2023). Precise Sensing of Leaf Temperatures for Smart Farm Applications. Horticulturae, 9.10.3390/horticulturae9040518 ↗
6. Enhanced secure device authentication algorithm in P2P-based smart farm system10.1007/s12083-018-0635-3 ↗
7. IoT and agriculture data analysis for smart farm10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.011 ↗
8. Choi, S., and Shin, Y.J. (2023). Role of Smart Farm as a Tool for Sustainable Economic Growth of Korean Agriculture: Using Input–Output Analysis. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15043450 ↗
9. Satellite-and drone-based remote sensing of crops and soils for smart farming—A review10.1080/00380768.2020.1738899 ↗
10. IoT-solar energy powered smart farm irrigation system10.1016/j.jnlest.2020.100017 ↗
11. (2023, July 10). Smart Agriculture Domestic and Overseas Market Status (Marketsandmarkets, 2020). Available online: https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5281/subview.do.
12. (2023, July 10). Smart Farm Overview. Available online: https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5280/subview.do.
13. (2023, July 10). Analysis on the Status and Future Development of Smart Farming Projects. Available online: https://korea.nabo.go.kr/naboEng/bbs/BMSR00154/view.do?boardId=3109&gubunCd=B154001&menuNo=17700027&pageIndex=1.
14. Tong, R.C., Whitehead, C.S., and Fawole, O.A. (2021). Effects of Conventional and Bokashi Hydroponics on Vegetative Growth, Yield and Quality Attributes of Bell Peppers. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10071281 ↗
15. Nguyen, G.N., and Lantzke, N. (2022). Mitigating the Adverse Effects of Semi-Arid Climate on Capsicum Cultivation by Using the Retractable Roof Production System. Plants, 11.10.3390/plants11202794 ↗
16. Arora, S., Kumar, A., Ogita, S., and Yau, Y.Y. (2022). Biotechnological Innovations for Environmental Bioremediation, Springer Nature Singapore.10.1007/978-981-16-9001-3 ↗
17. A Review on Urban Agriculture: Technology, Socio-Economy, and Policy10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11583 ↗
18. Kim, K.H., Shawon, M.R.A., An, J.H., Lee, H.J., Kwon, D.J., Hwang, I.-C., Bae, J.H., and Choi, K.Y. (2022). Effect of Shade Screen on Sap Flow, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, NDVI, Plant Growth and Fruit Characteristics of Cultivated Paprika in Greenhouse. Agriculture, 12.10.3390/agriculture12091405 ↗
19. Kwon, Y.B., Lee, J.H., Roh, Y.H., Choi, I.-L., Kim, Y., Kim, J., and Kang, H.-M. (2023). Effect of Supplemental Inter-Lighting on Paprika Cultivated in an Unheated Greenhouse in Summer Using Various Light-Emitting Diodes. Plants, 12.10.3390/plants12081684 ↗
20. Agriculture Contingency Plans for Managing Weather Aberrations and Extreme Climatic Events: Development, Implementation, and Impacts in India10.1016/bs.agron.2019.08.002 ↗
22. A Review on Deep Sequential Models for Forecasting Time Series Data
23. Detecting Human Driver Inattentive and Aggressive Driving Behavior Using Deep Learning: Recent Advances, Requirements, and Open Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999829 ↗
24. A Survey on LSTM Memristive Neural Network Architectures and Applications10.1140/epjst/e2019-900046-x ↗
25. Optimizing LSTM for Time Series Prediction in Indian Stock Market10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.257 ↗
26. A new short-term wind speed forecasting method based on fine-tuned LSTM neural network and optimal input sets10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112824 ↗
27. A Comparative Performance Analysis of Different Activation Functions in LSTM Networks for Classification10.1007/s00521-017-3210-6 ↗
28. Study on the prediction of stock price based on the associated network model of LSTM10.1007/s13042-019-01041-1 ↗
29. Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Xiao, F., Wang, Y., and Sun, L. (2018). Water Quality Prediction Method Based on IGRA and LSTM. Water, 10.10.3390/w10091148 ↗
30. Working Memory Connections for LSTM10.1016/j.neunet.2021.08.030 ↗
31. A survey on anomaly detection for technical systems using LSTM net-works10.1016/j.compind.2021.103498 ↗
32. Salehin, i., Talha, I., Hasan, M., Dip, S., Saifuzzaman, M., and Moon, N. (2020, January 26–27). An artificial intelligence based rainfall prediction using LSTM and neural network. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), Bhubaneswar, India.10.1109/WIECON-ECE52138.2020.9398022 ↗
33. Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., and Namin, A. (2019, January 9–12). The performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in forecasting time series. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005997 ↗
34. Alharbi, F.R., and Csala, D. (2021). Wind Speed and Solar Irradiance Prediction Using a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Model Based on Neural Networks. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14206501 ↗
35. Spatial distribution model of DEHP contamination categories in soil based on Bi-LSTM and sparse sampling10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113092 ↗
36. Recognition of Transportation State by Smartphone Sensors Using Deep Bi-LSTM Neural Network
37. Airborne particle pollution predictive model using Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) deep neural networks10.1007/s12145-020-00462-9 ↗
38. Dutta, A., Kumar, S., and Basu, M. (2020). A Gated Recurrent Unit Approach to Bitcoin Price Prediction. J. Risk Financ. Manag, 13.10.3390/jrfm13020023 ↗
39. An enhanced gated recurrent unit with auto-encoder for solving text classification problems10.1007/s13369-021-05691-8 ↗
40. Displacement prediction of Jiuxianping landslide using gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks10.1007/s11440-022-01495-8 ↗
41. A comparative study on long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit neural networks in fault diagnosis for chemical processes using visualization10.1016/j.jtice.2021.08.016 ↗
42. A Stateless Deep Learning Framework to Predict Net Asset Value10.1007/s00521-019-04525-x ↗
43. SiTGRU: Single-tunnelled gated recurrent unit for abnormality detection10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.034 ↗
44. A Novel Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Stock Prediction Based on Stock Prices and News10.1007/s41060-021-00279-9 ↗
45. Ensemble Approach Based on Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking for Short-Term Prediction in Agribusiness Time Series10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105837 ↗
46. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5 ↗
47. Stacking Ensemble-Based Intelligent Machine Learning Model for Predicting Post-COVID-19 Complications10.1007/s00354-021-00144-0 ↗
48. Cyberattack and Fraud Detection Using Ensemble Stacking10.3390/ai3010002 ↗
49. Temperature prediction for reheating furnace by gated recurrent unit approach10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3162424 ↗
50. Kernel density estimation based sampling for imbalanced class distribution10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.017 ↗
51. Unbiased cross-validation kernel density estimation for wind and PV probabilistic modelling10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115811 ↗
52. Wind power prediction based on LSTM networks and nonparametric kernel density es-timation10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952555 ↗
53. Probability Prediction of Short-Term User-Level Load Based on Random Forest and Kernel Density Estimation10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.256 ↗
54. Prediction of Solar Energy Guided by Pearson Correlation Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.energy.2021.120109 ↗
55. A new correlation coefficient between categorical, ordinal and interval variables with Pearson characteristics10.1016/j.csda.2020.107043 ↗
56. Chicco, D., and Giuseppe, J. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
57. Correlation Research of Phase Angle Variation and Coating Performance by Means of Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105459 ↗
58. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
59. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
60. Improved Singular Filtering-Gaussian Process Regression-Long Short-Term Memory Model for Whole-Life-Cycle Remaining Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Adaptive to Fast Aging and Multi-Current Variations10.1016/j.energy.2023.128677 ↗