Factory Simulation of Optimization Techniques Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Storage Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, reinforcement learning (RL) was used in factory simulation to optimize storage devices for use in Industry 4.0 and digital twins. Industry 4.0 is increasing productivity and efficiency in manufacturing through automation, data exchange, and the integration of new technologies. Innovative technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and big data analytics are smartly automating manufacturing processes and integrating data with production systems to monitor and analyze production data in real time and optimize factory operations. A digital twin is a digital model of a physical product or process in the real world. It is built on data and real-time information collected through sensors and accurately simulates the behavior and performance of a real-world manufacturing floor. With a digital twin, one can leverage data at every stage of product design, development, manufacturing, and maintenance to predict, solve, and optimize problems. First, we defined an RL environment, modeled it, and validated its ability to simulate a real physical system. Subsequently, we introduced a method to calculate reward signals and apply them to the environment to ensure the alignment of the behavior of the RL agent with the task objective. Traditional approaches use simple reward functions to tune the behavior of reinforcement learning agents. These approaches issue rewards according to predefined rules and often use reward signals that are unrelated to the task goal. However, in this study, the reward signal calculation method was modified to consider the task goal and the characteristics of the physical system and calculate more realistic and meaningful rewards. This method reflects the complex interactions and constraints that occur during the optimization process of the storage device and generates more accurate episodes of reinforcement learning in agent behavior. Unlike the traditional simple reward function, this reflects the complexity and realism of the storage optimization task, making the reward more sophisticated and effective.The stocker simulation model was used to validate the effectiveness of RL. The model is a storage device that simulates logistics in a manufacturing production area. The results revealed that RL is a useful tool for automating and optimizing complex logistics systems, increasing the applicability of RL in logistics. We proposed a novel method for creating an agent through learning using the proximal policy optimization algorithm, and the agent was optimized by configuring various learning options. The application of reinforcement learning resulted in an effectiveness of 30–100%, and the methods can be expanded to other fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Energy Efficiency and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Smart Factory Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
AI Machine Vision Smart Factory Lab, LG Innotek, 111 Jinwi2sandan-ro, Jinwi-myeon, Pyeongtaek-si 17708, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Funding
SungKyunKwan University and the BK21 FOUR (Graduate School Innovation) · Ministry of Education (MOE, Korea) · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Digital twin for sustainable manufacturing supply chains: Current trends, future perspectives, and an implementation framework10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121448 ↗
2. Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7 ↗
3. Xue, T., Zeng, P., and Yu, H. (2018, January 20–22). A reinforcement learning method for multi-AGV scheduling in manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Lyon, France.10.1109/ICIT.2018.8352413 ↗
4. Digital Manufacturing- Applications Past, Current, and Future Trends10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.250 ↗
5. Arents, J., and Greitans, M. (2022). Smart Industrial Robot Control Trends, Challenges and Opportunities within Manufacturing. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020937 ↗
6. Simulation-based Optimization of Material Requirements Planning Parameters10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.310 ↗
7. An overview of current technologies and emerging trends in factory automation10.1080/00207543.2018.1510558 ↗
8. Wu, J., Peng, Z., Cui, D., Li, Q., and He, J. (2018, January 15–18). A multi-object optimization cloud workflow scheduling algorithm based on reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Wuhan, China.
9. Feldkamp, N., Bergmann, S., and Strassburger, S. (2020, January 14–18). Simulation-based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Modular Production Systems. Proceedings of the 2020 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9384089 ↗
10. Digital twin modeling10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.015 ↗
11. Development of a multidimensional conceptual model for job shop smart manufacturing scheduling from the Industry 4.0 perspective10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.03.011 ↗
12. A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.004 ↗
13. Effectiveness of virtual reality in discrete event simulation models for manufacturing systems10.1016/j.cie.2022.108079 ↗
14. Extending the lean value stream mapping to the context of Industry 4.0: An agent-based technology approach10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.002 ↗
15. (2023, August 01). Available online: https://stevebong.tistory.com/4.
16. (2023, August 01). Available online: https://minsuksung-ai.tistory.com/13.
17. Chen, Y.-L., Cai, Y.-R., and Cheng, M.-Y. (2023). Vision-Based Robotic Object Grasping—A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11020275 ↗
18. Peyas, I.S., Hasan, Z., and Tushar, M.R.R. (2021, January 7–10). Autonomous Warehouse Robot using Deep Q-Learning. Proceedings of the TENCON 2021—2021 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Auckland, New Zealand.10.1109/TENCON54134.2021.9707256 ↗
19. (2023, August 01). Available online: https://velog.io/@baekgom/LIFO-%EC%84%A0%EC%9E%85%EC%84%A0%EC%B6%9C-FIFO-%ED%9B%84%EC%9E%85%EC%84%A0%EC%B6%9C.
20. Utami, M.C., Sabarkhah, D.R., Fetrina, E., and Huda, M.Q. (2018, January 7–9). The Use of FIFO Method For Analysing and Designing the Inventory Information System. Proceedings of the 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Parapat, Indonesia.10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674266 ↗
21. Digital Twin Enhanced Dynamic Job-Shop Scheduling10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.008 ↗
22. Virtual Factory: Digital Twin Based Integrated Factory Simulations10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.043 ↗
23. Systematic review on machine learning (ML) methods for manufacturing processes—Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) methods for field application10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.109 ↗
24. Jain, S., and Lechevalier, D. (2016, January 11–14). Standards based generation of a virtual factory model. Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/WSC.2016.7822313 ↗
25. Leon, J.F., and Marone, P. (2022, January 11–14). A Tutorial on Combining Flexsim with Python for Developing Discrete-Event Simheuristics. Proceedings of the 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Singapore.10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015309 ↗
26. A simulation study of Industry 4.0 factories based on the ontology on flexibility with using FlexSim® software
27. Belsare, S., and Badilla, E.D. (2022, January 11–14). Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Event Simulation: The Premise, Reality, and Promise. Proceedings of the 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Singapore.10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015503 ↗
28. Park, J.-S., and Kim, J.-W. (2023, January 8–10). Developing Reinforcement Learning based Job Allocation Model by Using FlexSim Software. Proceedings of the Winter Conference of the Korea Computer Information Society, Daegwallyeong, Republic of Korea.
29. (2023, August 01). Available online: https://ropiens.tistory.com/85.
30. Krenczyk, D., and Paprocka, I. (2023). Integration of Discrete Simulation, Prediction, and Optimization Methods for a Production Line Digital Twin Design. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16062339 ↗
31. Modular production control using deep reinforcement learning: Proximal policy optimization10.1007/s10845-021-01778-z ↗
32. Dynamic job shop scheduling based on deep reinforcement learning for multi-agent manufacturing systems10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102412 ↗