Show source-provided references
1. Multifactor Influences on the Quality of Experience Service Users of Telecommunication Providers in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
10.24874/IJQR17.02-05 ↗2. Banjanin, M.K., Stojčić, M., Danilović, D., Ćurguz, Z., Vasiljević, M., and Puzić, G. (2022). Classification and Prediction of Sustainable Quality of Experience of Telecommunication Service Users Using Machine Learning Models. Sustainability, 14.
10.3390/su142417053 ↗3. Mesbahi, N., and Dahmouni, H. (2016, January 26–29). Delay and jitter analysis in LTE networks. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), Fez, Morocco.
10.1109/WINCOM.2016.7777202 ↗5. Stojčić, M., Banjanin, M.K., Vasiljević, M., Stjepanović, A., and Ćurguz, Z. (2023, January 11–12). PCA modeling of extraction and selection of variables influencing LTE network delay in urban mobility conditions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Traffic and Communication Technologies ATCT 2023, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
10.59478/ATCT.2023.16 ↗6. (2014). Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Quality of Service (QoS) Concept and Architecture (Standard No. ETSI TS 123 107 v12.0.0). Available online: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123100_123199/123107/12.00.00_60/ts_123107v120000p.pdf.
9. Đukić, A., Bjelošević, R., Stojčić, M., and Banjanin, M.K. (2023, January 22–26). Network Model of Multiagent Communication of Traffic Inspection for Supervision and Control of Passenger Transportation in Road and City Traffic. Proceedings of the Croatian Society for Information, Communication and Electronic Technology–MIPRO 2023 46th (Hybrid) Convention, Opatija, Croatia.
10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159771 ↗10. Torres-Figueroa, L., Schepker, H.F., and Jiru, J. (2020, January 25–28). QoS evaluation and prediction for C-V2X communication in commercially-deployed LTE and mobile edge networks. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), Antwerp, Belgium.
10.1109/VTC2020-Spring48590.2020.9129382 ↗11. Zhang, W., Feng, M., Krunz, M., and Volos, H. (2020, January 7–11). Latency prediction for delay-sensitive v2x applications in mobile cloud/edge computing systems. Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2020–2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348104 ↗13. Khatouni, A.S., Soro, F., and Giordano, D. (2019, January 8–12). A machine learning application for latency prediction in operational 4g networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM), Arlington, VA, USA.
14. Zhohov, R., Minovski, D., Johansson, P., and Andersson, K. (2018, January 1–4). Real-time performance evaluation of LTE for IIoT. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 43rd Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), Chicago, IL, USA.
10.1109/LCN.2018.8638081 ↗16. Lai, W.K., Hsu, C.W., Kuo, T.H., and Lin, M.T. (2015, January 7–10). A LTE downlink scheduling mechanism with the prediction of packet delay. Proceedings of the 2015 Seventh International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks, Sapporo, Japan.
10.1109/ICUFN.2015.7182546 ↗17. Nasri, M., and Hamdi, M. (2019, January 19–21). LTE QoS parameters prediction using multivariate linear regression algorithm. Proceedings of the 2019 22nd Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks and Workshops (ICIN), Paris, France.
10.1109/ICIN.2019.8685914 ↗19. Banjanin, M.K., Stojčić, M., Drajić, D., Ćurguz, Z., Milanović, Z., and Stjepanović, A. (2021). Adaptive Modeling of Prediction of Telecommunications Network Throughput Performances in the Domain of Motorway Coverage. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11083559 ↗20. Adaptive control signal parameters in LTE technology with MIMO
21. Ren, J., Zhang, X., and Xin, Y. (2019, January 15–18). Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network to Recognize LTE Uplink Interference. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Marrakesh, Morocco.
10.1109/WCNC.2019.8885870 ↗23. Kuhn, M., and Johnson, K. (2019). Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models, Chapman and Hall/CRC. [1st ed.].
10.1201/9781315108230 ↗24. Feature selection: A data perspective
25. Feature Selection Methods: Case of Filter and Wrapper Approaches for Maximising Classification Accuracy
26. MathWorks (2023, March 27). Introduction to Feature Selection. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/feature-selection.html.
27. Kira, K., and Rendell, L.A. (1992, January 1–3). A practical approach to feature selection. Proceedings of the Machine learning proceedings, Aberdeen, UK.
10.1016/B978-1-55860-247-2.50037-1 ↗28. Kira, K., and Rendell, L.A. (1992, January 12–16). The feature selection problem: Traditional methods and a new algorithm. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence—AAAI’92, San Jose, CA, USA. Available online: https://cdn.aaai.org/AAAI/1992/AAAI92-020.pdf.
30. Robnik-Šikonja, M., and Kononenko, I. (1997, January 8–12). An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. Proceedings of the Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (ICML’97), Nashville, TN, USA.
31. MathWorks (2023, April 24). Relief. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/relieff.html.
34. Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., and Turner, C. (2018). A systems dynamics enabled real-time efficiency for fuel cell data-driven remanufacturing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2.
10.20944/preprints201808.0540.v1 ↗35. Hugh, J. (2021). Engineering Design, Planning, and Management, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].
38. Ahmad, M.A., Eckert, C., and Teredesai, A. (September, January 29). Interpretable machine learning in healthcare. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, Washington, DC, USA.
10.1145/3233547.3233667 ↗39. Abdullah, T.A., Zahid, M.S.M., and Ali, W. (2021). A review of interpretable ML in healthcare: Taxonomy, applications, challenges, and future directions. Symmetry, 13.
10.3390/sym13122439 ↗40. Dherin, B., Munn, M., Rosca, M., and Barrett, D. (December, January 28). Why neural networks find simple solutions: The many regularizers of geometric complexity. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems-NeurIPS, New Orleans, LA, USA.
41. Interpretability of machine learning-based prediction models in healthcare
10.1002/widm.1379 ↗45. Guo, M., Zhang, Q., Liao, X., and Chen, Y. (2019). An interpretable machine learning framework for modelling human decision behavior. arXiv.
49. Beyond t test and ANOVA: Applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research
10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030 ↗50. Identification and selection of building façade’s smart materials according to sustainable development goals