Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Kinetics of the Overhead Deep Squat in Healthy Adults: A Descriptive Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The squat, a fundamental functional movement, is prone to biomechanical inefficiencies. Several screening batteries utilize the Overhead Deep Squat (OHDS) to assess individuals for stability and mobility deficits. The purpose of this study was to create a comprehensive description of the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics and kinetics for normal, healthy participants during an overhead deep squat. This descriptive study containing 70 healthy young adults (31 male, 39 female; aged 18–35) utilized a video motion tracking system interfaced with force plates to obtain full-body 3D kinematics and kinetics. Seventy-three retro-reflective markers from the combined Plug-in Gait, Vicon upper limb, and Oxford Multi-segment foot models were used. Visual 3D software was used to determine joint kinematics and kinetics. Means and standard deviations of lower limb and trunk segment joint angles in the sagittal, transverse, and horizontal planes, as well as the ground reaction forces and net internal joint moments, were computed. The largest movements and joint moments occurred in the sagittal plane; however, the frontal and transverse plane appear crucial to providing stability and mobility. These results can be used as pilot normative data for both future studies and during assessments of biomechanical abnormalities in training and rehabilitation settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.12.002 ↗
2. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an injury prediction tool among active adult populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/1941738115607445 ↗
3. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes
4. Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population
5. The Functional Movement Screen: A reliability study10.2519/jospt.2012.3838 ↗
6. Overhead deep squat performance predicts Functional Movement Screen™ score
7. Injury identification: The efficacy of the functional movement screenTM in female and male rugby union players10.26603/ijspt20180605 ↗
8. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the Functional Movement Screen: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1177/0363546516641937 ↗
9. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606df2 ↗
10. Biomechanical analysis of the different classifications of the Functional Movement Screen deep squat test10.1080/14763141.2010.539623 ↗
11. Two- and 3-dimensional knee valgus are reduced after an exercise intervention in young adults with demonstrable valgus during squatting10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.16 ↗
12. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing–lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29 ↗
13. Kinematics of the trunk and the lower extremities during restricted and unrestricted squats10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736034 ↗
14. Gender differences in trunk, pelvis and lower limb kinematics during a single leg squat10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.006 ↗
15. Comparison of lower extremity kinematics during the overhead deep squat by Functional Movement Screen score
16. Sex Differences during an Overhead Squat Assessment10.1123/jab.2014-0272 ↗
17. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.002 ↗
18. The effects of forefoot varus on hip and knee kinematics during single-leg squat10.1016/j.math.2014.07.001 ↗
19. The effect of knee flexion angles and ground conditions on the muscle activation of the lower extremity in the squat position10.1589/jpts.29.1852 ↗
20. Interrater reliability of the Functional Movement Screen10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04 ↗
21. Frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics and gluteus maximus recruitment correlate with frontal plane knee kinematics during single-leg squat tests in women10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.017 ↗
22. Motor control strategies during double leg squat following anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: An observational study10.1186/1743-0003-11-19 ↗
23. Functional movement screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function—Part 1
24. Winter, D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [4th ed.].10.1002/9780470549148 ↗
25. A Fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation10.1016/0141-1195(86)90098-7 ↗
26. Reliability of a multi-segment foot model in a neutral cushioning shoe during treadmill walking10.1186/s13047-018-0301-2 ↗
27. Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: A repeatability analysis10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00101-4 ↗
28. Prediction of the hip joint centre in adults, children, and patients with cerebral palsy based on magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.003 ↗
29. A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.03.004 ↗
30. Comparing the Harrington and Davis method of hip joint centre localisation for unimpaired and pathological subjects10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.158 ↗
31. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.10.084 ↗
32. Reliability and accuracy in three-dimensional gait analysis: A comparison of two lower body protocols10.1123/jab.29.1.105 ↗
33. Regression models to predict hip joint centers in pathological hip population10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.001 ↗
34. Baker, R. (2013). Measuring Walking: A Handbook of Clinical Gait Analysis, Mac Keith Press. Available online: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/dmcn.12288.
35. Lower extremity joint coupling during running: A current update10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.005 ↗
36. Discrete and continuous joint coupling relationships in uninjured recreational runners10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.012 ↗
37. Neumann, D.A. (2016). Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
38. Robertson, D.G.E., Caldwell, G.E., Hamill, F., Kamen, G., and Whittlesey, S.N. (2013). Research Methods in Biomechanics, Human Kinetics. [2nd ed.].10.5040/9781492595809 ↗
39. Anticipatory postural adjustments in stance and grip10.1007/PL00005732 ↗
40. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.005 ↗
41. Estimation of the hip joint centre in human motion analysis: A systematic review10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005 ↗
42. The effect of weak hip abductors or external rotators on knee valgus kinematics in healthy subjects: A systematic review10.1123/jsr.21.3.273 ↗
43. Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.09.011 ↗