Identifying Weak Adhesion in Single-Lap Joints Using Lamb Wave Data and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
In the last few years, the application of adhesive joints has grown significantly. Adhesive joints are often affected by a specific type of defect known as weak adhesion, which can only be effectively detected through destructive tests. In this paper, we propose nondestructive testing techniques to detect weak adhesion. These are based on Lamb wave (LW) data and artificial intelligence algorithms. A dataset consisting of simulated LW time series extracted from single-lap joints (SLJs) subjected to multiple levels of weak adhesion was generated. The raw time series were pre-processed to avoid numerical saturation and to remove outliers. The processed data were then used as the input to different artificial intelligence algorithms, namely feedforward neural networks (FNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), for their training and testing. The results showed that all algorithms were capable of detecting up to 20 different levels of weak adhesion in SLJs, with an overall accuracy between 97% and 99%. Regarding the training time, the FNN emerged as the most-appropriate. On the other hand, the GRU showed overall faster learning, being able to converge in less than 50 epochs. Therefore, the FNN and GRU presented the best accuracy and had relatively acceptable convergence times, making them the most-suitable choices. The proposed approach constitutes a new framework allowing the creation of standardized data and optimal algorithm selection for further work on nondestructive damage detection and localization in adhesive joints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
INEGI—Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of crack initiation and propagation of adhesive lap joints using an energy failure criterion10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.12.004 ↗
2. da Silva, L.F.M., Öchsner, A., and Adams, R.D. (2018). Handbook of Adhesion Technology, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-55411-2 ↗
3. Strength of double-reinforced adhesive joints10.1515/mt-2020-0024 ↗
4. Structural health monitoring of adhesive joints using Lamb waves: A review
5. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (2014). Federal Aviation Regulations—Sec. 23.573.
6. The non-destructive testing of adhesively bonded structure: A review10.1080/00218468608074943 ↗
7. Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites10.1515/mt-2021-2038 ↗
8. The analysis of kissing bonds in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.019 ↗
9. PZT based tunable Interdigital Transducer for Lamb waves based NDT and SHM10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.013 ↗
10. Numerical Investigation of Fatigue Behavior of Non-patched and Patched Aluminum/Composite Plates10.26701/ems.923798 ↗
11. Alleyne, D.N. (1991). The Nondestructive Testing of Plates Using Ultrasound Lamb Waves. [Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London (University of London)].
12. Embedded Non-Destructive Evaluation for Structural Health Monitoring, Damage Detection, and Failure Prevention10.1177/0583102405052561 ↗
13. Thermal sensitivity of Lamb waves for structural health monitoring applications10.1016/j.ultras.2012.10.007 ↗
14. Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
15. Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Materials Using Lamb Wave Methods10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
16. Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring10.1177/1045389X05050106 ↗
17. Guided-waves in a low velocity impacted composite winglet10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.774.343 ↗
18. Dispersion curves for a natural fibre composite panel: Experimental and numerical investigation10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.029 ↗
19. A novel nonlinear Lamb wave based approach for detection of multiple disbonds in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102842 ↗
20. Adams, R.D., Adams, R.D., Comyn, J., Wake, W.C., and Wake, W. (1997). Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering, Springer Science & Business Media.
21. Monitoring the curing process of epoxy adhesive using ultrasound and Lamb wave dispersion curves10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107397 ↗
22. Classification of multicomponent analytical data of olive oils using different neural networks10.1016/0003-2670(94)00085-9 ↗
23. Robust skin diseases detection and classification using deep neural networks10.14419/ijet.v7i4.24178 ↗
24. Introduction to artificial neural network
25. Optimisation of the predictive ability of artificial neural network (ANN) models: A comparison of three ANN programs and four classes of training algorithm10.1016/j.ejps.2005.04.010 ↗
26. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
27. A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures10.1162/neco_a_01199 ↗
28. Dhruv, P., and Naskar, S. (2020). Machine Learning and Information Processing, Springer.
29. Yang, S., Yu, X., and Zhou, Y. (2020, January 12–14). LSTM and BRU neural network performance comparison study: Taking yelp review dataset as an example. Proceedings of the 2020 International workshop on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI), Shanghai, China.10.1109/IWECAI50956.2020.00027 ↗
30. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 ↗
31. Staudemeyer, R.C., and Morris, E.R. (2019). Understanding LSTM–a tutorial into long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. arXiv.
32. Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit–Recurrent Neural Network for State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928037 ↗
33. O’Shea, K., and Nash, R. (2015). An introduction to convolutional neural networks. arXiv.
34. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
35. Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: Part I. Wave propagation10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/018 ↗
36. Lamb wave propagation modelling and simulation using parallel processing architecture and graphical cards10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075001 ↗
37. Simulation of Lamb wave reflections at plate edges using the semi-analytical finite element method10.1016/j.ultras.2012.05.008 ↗
38. Numerical investigation of fatigue behaviours of non-patched and patched aluminium pipes
39. Feature extraction and visualization for damage detection on adhesive joints, utilizing Lamb waves and supervised machine learning algorithms10.1177/09544062221086410 ↗
40. Damage Classification Methodology Utilizing Lamb Waves and Artificial Neural Networks10.1520/JTE20210754 ↗
41. Poudel, A., and Chu, T.P. (2022). Assessment of Composite Aluminum Adhesive Joints Using Digital Image Correlation. Mater. Eval., 80.10.32548/2022.me-04281 ↗
42. Cantrell, D.R. (2022). Onset of Kissing Bond Formation for Varying Levels of Bondline Contamination in CFRP. [Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology].