Analytical Method for Assessing Stability of a Counterbalanced Forklift Truck Assembled with Interchangeable Equipment
Source abstract
Abstract
Counterbalanced forklift trucks (FLT) are frequently used in combination with interchangeable equipment in order to handle loads in different manners. The main risks which may arise after assembling interchangeable equipment to a FLT are related to the loss of stability of the assembly. Actually, the presence of interchangeable equipment and the associated payload may change in a significant way the overall centre of gravity with respect to the FLT in its basic configuration with forks. Therefore, the stability limits of the assembly, based on the same footprints on the ground of the FLT alone, are affected by the position of the overall centre of gravity. Thus, the presence of interchangeable equipment could reduce the functionality (e.g., lifting capability, lifting height, etc.) of the FLT in order to continue its stability during use. Often, interchangeable equipment is placed on the market by manufacturers other than the FLT manufacturer. In these cases, the correct and safe coupling of the interchangeable equipment with the FLT is the responsibility of the manufacturers of interchangeable equipment, including the stability risk assessment. Thus, the interchangeable equipment manufacturer should have access to the relevant information of the FLT concerning operative and structural features and its configuration as a procedure for assessing the correct and safe coupling. Otherwise, he should perform experimental stability tests for each model of FLT so that its interchangeable equipment can be fitted. Specific research activity is developed in order to define an analytical procedure to assess the stability of FLT when assembled with interchangeable equipment. Specific typologies of FLTs and interchangeable equipment have been selected in order to better characterise the case study. The analytical equations mimic the static stability tests. The results achieved have been compared to experimental data in order to optimise the procedure. The results attained by the application of the analytical procedure to all the combinations of main typologies of FLTs and the interchangeable equipment selected showed good agreement with experimental tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Agriculture and Farm Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Innovation Technologies, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Forklift tipover: A detailed analysis
2. Hazardous Exposures and injury types associated with the use of industrial lift trucks in Sweden 2005–2007
3. Analysis of forklift accident trends within Victorian industry (Australia)10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.017 ↗
4. Development and validation of a numerical model for predicting forklift truck tip-over10.1080/00423110802381216 ↗
5. Identification of occupational accident causes by use the Ishikawa diagram and Pareto principles
6. Risk estimation with the application of the matrix method during the operation of the forklift
7. Duarte, J., Marques, A.T., and Santos Baptista, J. (2021). Occupational accidents related to heavy machinery: A systematic review. Safety, 7.10.3390/safety7010021 ↗
8. Stability analysis of counterbalanced forklift trucks
9. Gardella, M., and Martini, A. (2019). Multibody models and simulations to assess the stability of counterbalance forklift trucks. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-23132-3_63 ↗
10. Anti-rollover control based on stable zone partition of counterbalanced forklift trucks10.1007/s12239-021-0132-1 ↗
11. Design of simulator for rollover prevention of forklift truck
12. Stability analysis of a semi-trailer articulated vehicle: A review10.30939/ijastech..855733 ↗
13. Dynamic stability of forklift trucks in cornering situations: Parametrical analysis using a driving simulator10.1080/00423114.2010.532557 ↗
14. Analysis of the design of lifting and transporting vehicles with a variable center of gravity—A literature and patent overview10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V69I12P208 ↗
15. (2018). Industrial Trucks—Verification of Stability—Part 2: Counterbalanced Trucks with Mast (Standard No. ISO 22915-2).
16. (2020). Industrial Trucks—Safety Requirements and Verification—Part 1: Self-Propelled Industrial Trucks, Other than Driverless Trucks, Variable-Reach Trucks and Burden-Carrier Trucks (Standard No. EN ISO 3691-1).
17. Static stability of articulated front loader10.1063/5.0099339 ↗
18. Troyanovskaya, I., and Shepelev, S.D. (2020, January 18–22). Design of Agricultural Loader with Articulated Frame. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2020), Sochi, Russia.
19. Motor vehicle rollover and static stability: An exposure study10.2105/AJPH.87.5.839 ↗
20. Another look at the static stability factor (SSF) in predicting vehicle rollover10.1080/13588265.2014.919730 ↗
21. Analysis on anti-overturning stability of a truck crane based on zero moment point theory10.6036/10484 ↗
22. Kasahara, M., and Mori, Y. (2017, January 19–22). Relation between overturn and the center of gravity of a forklift truck. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Kanazawa, Japan.10.23919/SICE.2017.8105471 ↗
23. Fork-truck stability—A study in moments
24. FEM European Materials Handling Federation (2021). Guidance on the Classification of Attachments for Industrial Trucks According to Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, FEM. [1st ed.]. FEM 4.107.