journal article·2022-12-12Open access

Chin Morphology in Relation to the Skeletal Pattern, Age, Gender, and Ethnicity

Yuka Okumura, So Koizumi, Yuki Suginouchi, Yu Hikita, Yong-Il Kim, Mohamed Adel, Mohamed Nadim, Tetsutaro Yamaguchi

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 24

Abstract

Chin morphology is visually impactful and significantly influences harmonious facial appearance. Therefore, it is important to know the morphological characteristics of the chin in relation to gender and skeletal pattern when performing an orthodontic and surgical orthognathic treatment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between chin size, skeletal pattern, age, gender, and ethnicity. In this study, cone-beam computed tomography images of 208 participants (males: 90, females: 118; 63 Koreans and 145 Egyptians), aged 18 years and older, were used to evaluate the size of the chin in linear dimension, volume, and skeletal pattern. The larger the vertical skeletal pattern, the larger the chin volume and the smaller the width (p < 0.01). In the anteroposterior skeletal pattern, Class III showed a larger volume than that of Class II and Class I (p < 0.01). There was no significant association between age and any of the chin-related measurements. Regarding gender, all measurements of chins were larger for men than for women (p < 0.01). In terms of ethnicity, Koreans had larger chin volumes than Egyptians p < 0.01). Chin volume was related to population, sex, anteroposterior skeletal pattern, and vertical skeletal pattern, indicating the combined effects of various factors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · dental development and anomalies · Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan

Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea

Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA

Department of Orthodontics, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. How did modern morphology evolve in the human mandible? The relationship between static adult allometry and mandibular variability in Homo sapiens10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103026 ↗
2. The ontogeny of the chin: An analysis of allometric and biomechanical scaling10.1111/joa.12307 ↗
3. Why do humans have chins? Testing the mechanical significance of modern human symphyseal morphology with finite element analysis
4. Cross-sectional geometry and morphology of the mandibular symphysis in Middle and Late Pleistocene Homo10.1006/jhev.2002.0563 ↗
5. The anterior buccal mandibular depressions: Ontogeny and phylogeny10.1002/ajpa.1330780311 ↗
6. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.015 ↗
7. Assessment of sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in Romanian patients with obstructive sleep apnea
8. Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring—systematic review and new directions of development10.1080/08869634.2019.1673285 ↗
9. Genial tubercle advancement and genioplasty for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1002/lary.26218 ↗
10. Feminization of the Chin: Genioplasty Using Osteotomies10.1016/j.fsc.2019.01.002 ↗
11. Sella, T.T., Hershkovitz, I., May, H., Vardimon, A.D., Sarig, R., and Shpack, N. (2020). Variation in Chin and Mandibular Symphysis Size and Shape in Males and Females: A CT-Based Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17124249 ↗
12. Computer-Assisted Planning and 3D Printing-Assisted Modeling for Chin Augmentation10.1093/asj/sjx071 ↗
13. Cross-sectional human study of soft tissue chin (STC) thickness in adult patients in relation to sex, facial pattern and skeletal class10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.002 ↗
14. Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.062 ↗
15. Improvement of chin profile after mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty for correction of prognathism and long chin10.1007/s00266-012-9933-y ↗
16. Cephalometric synthesis10.1016/0002-9416(60)90172-X ↗
17. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0 ↗
18. Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships10.2319/030513-185.1 ↗
19. Are chin and symphysis morphology facial type-dependent? A computed tomography-based study10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.031 ↗
20. Chen, H., Liu, Z., Hu, X., Wu, B., and Gu, Y. (2021). Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: Based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis. BMC Oral Health, 21.10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3 ↗
21. Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures10.1007/s11282-017-0292-x ↗
22. Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks10.1111/clr.12746 ↗
23. Evaluation of the anterior mandibular donor site one year after secondary reconstruction of an alveolar cleft: 3-dimensional analysis using cone-beam computed tomography10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.04.023 ↗
24. Similarity index for intuitive assessment of three-dimensional facial asymmetry10.1038/s41598-019-47477-x ↗
25. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values10.2319/012913-87.1 ↗
26. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: A comparative study of Dahlberg’s formula10.1093/ejo/cjr010 ↗
27. Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and skeletal pattern in adults10.5603/FM.a2021.0045 ↗
28. Comparison of three-dimensional soft-tissue evaluations between skeletal and pseudo-class III malocclusions10.1038/s41598-020-71772-7 ↗
29. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70022-2 ↗
30. Relationship between the maxillofacial skeletal pattern and the morphology of the mandibular symphysis: Structural equation modeling10.4041/kjod.2019.49.3.170 ↗
31. Antero-posterior and vertical facial type variations influence the aesthetic preference of the antero-posterior lip positions10.1093/ejo/cjv073 ↗
32. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.029 ↗
33. Current Concepts in Orthognathic Surgery10.1097/PRS.0000000000004438 ↗
34. Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique—A clinical study10.4103/njms.NJMS_76_20 ↗
35. Coon, C.S. (1972). The Races of Europe, ABC-CLIO.
36. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms
37. Effects of interracial crosses on cephalometric measurements10.1002/ajpa.1330690405 ↗
38. Change in the gonial angle10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb01499.x ↗
39. Factors associated with the morphology of the mandibular symphysis and soft tissue chin10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e2119347.oar ↗
40. A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the Miss Korea pageant contestants10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.87 ↗
41. Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: Implications for adaptive hypotheses10.1002/ajpa.21330 ↗
42. Mandible: An Indicator for Sex Determination—A Three-dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study10.4103/ccd.ccd_313_18 ↗