Optimization of Bituminous Road Surfacing Rehabilitations Based on Optimization of Road Asset Value
Source abstract
Abstract
The article presents a complex pavement management system method that utilizes a novel optimization method of rehabilitation plans for individual road sections based on asset value optimization. This method is being implemented and tested by the Slovak Road Administration. The performance-based asset value optimization objectives are Socio-Economic Value and Technical Value of Assets, which breaks down into the Value of Structural Condition and Operational Capacity Value. Life cycle cost analysis is used to find the optimal rehabilitation year of individual road sections to optimize the asset value and minimize financial and economic costs while considering the life cycle extension provided by the rehabilitation in a given year. For the method to be reliable, two main preconditions need to be met. First, the residual bearing capacity calculation method needs to be based on rheological parameters of surfacing materials. This is significant because the residual bearing capacity is used for both choosing the correct rehabilitation technology and calculating the life cycle extension by the rehabilitation action. The second precondition is a reliable pavement performance model. This is significant because pavement deterioration is used to calculate road user costs, which serve as a key input to calculate assets’ Socio-Economic and Operational Capacity value.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Urban Transport Systems Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia
Funding
European Regional Development Fund
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu, K. (2015). Development of PCI-Based Pavement Performance Model for Management of Road Infrastructure System, Arizona State University. Available online: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/163996/content/Wu_asu_0010N_15506.pdf.
2. Selection of pavement performance models for use in the Portuguese PMS10.1080/10298436.2010.506538 ↗
3. Critical Review of Flexible Pavement Performance Models10.1007/s12205-014-0255-2 ↗
4. Asphalt Concrete Mixtures: Requirements with Regard to Life Cycle Assessment10.1155/2015/567238 ↗
5. The Benefits of Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Research to Funders10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.311 ↗
6. Asphalt concrete overlay optimization based on pavement performance models10.1155/2017/6063508 ↗
7. Accelerated Pavement Testing in Slovakia: APT Tester 105-03-110.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.132 ↗
8. Life Cycle Extension of a Pavement Structure
9. Use of FWD deflection basin parameters (sci, bdi, bci) for pavement condition assessment10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.196-202 ↗
10. Pavement moduli back-calculation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123026 ↗
11. New Layer-Moduli Back-Calculation Method Based on the Constrained Extended Kalman Filter10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(20) ↗
12. Utilization of traffic speed deflectometer for pavement structural evaluations10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109326 ↗
13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2008). Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). [Interim ed.].
14. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): A bird’s-eye view10.1007/BF03325749 ↗
15. Comparison of resilient modulus values for Florida flexible mechanistic-empirical pavement design10.1080/10298436.2011.633170 ↗
16. Sartori, D., Catalano, G., Genco, M., Pancotti, C., Sirtori, E., Vignetti, S., and Del Bo, C. (2015). Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, Publications Office of the European Union.
17. Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements10.1080/10298436.2014.943207 ↗
18. (2022, August 26). Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Procedures Manual: State of California Department of Transportation Division of Maintenance Pavement Program, Available online: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/maintenance/documents/office-of-concrete-pavement/life-cycle-cost-analysis/lcca-25ca-manual-final-aug-1-2013-v2-a11y.pdf.
19. A life-cycle optimization model using semi-markov process for highway bridge maintenance10.1016/j.apm.2016.10.038 ↗
20. Mechanistic-Empirical and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Optimizing Flexible Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000367 ↗
21. Enhanced benefit–cost analysis for infrastructure fund allocation10.1139/cjce-2014-0281 ↗
22. Road network pavement maintenance optimisation using the HDM-4 pavement performance prediction models10.1080/10298436.2011.563851 ↗
23. Multi-objective optimization for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making: A critical review and future directions10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103840 ↗
24. A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: Road pavement construction and management in Portugal10.1080/10298436.2014.942862 ↗
25. Development of Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program: Pavement Assets Under Performance-Based Contracts10.3141/2361-01 ↗
26. Optimal Performance Threshold Determination for Highway Asset Interventions: Analytical Framework and Application10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000198 ↗
27. A holistic approach to asset management in the Netherlands10.1080/15732479.2012.657650 ↗
28. Asset Management and Pavement Management: Using Common Elements to Maximize Overall Benefits10.3141/1769-01 ↗
29. Mikolaj, J., Remek, Ľ., and Kozel, M. (2022). Road Asset Value Calculation Based on Asset Performance, Community Benefits and Technical Condition. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14074375 ↗
30. (2022, August 26). Piarc Asset Management Manual: A Guide for Practitioners. Available online: https://road-asset.piarc.org/en.
31. Common Framework for a European Life, Cycle Based Asset Management Approach for Transport Infrastructure Networks
32. Why asset management should be a corporate function
33. Transport equity analysis10.1080/01441647.2017.1278647 ↗
34. (2020, August 26). AM4INFRA. Available online: www.am4infra.eu.
35. Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development OECD (2001). Asset Management for the Roads Sector. Road Transport and Intermodal Linkages Research Programme, OECD Publishing.
36. U.S. Department of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration (1999). Asset Management Primer.
37. The Infrastructure We Ride on. Decision Making in Transportation Investment10.1080/01441647.2018.1517136 ↗
38. Transport network criticality metrics: A comparative analysis and a guideline for selection10.1080/01441647.2019.1703843 ↗
39. Multi–Objective Approaches to Cross-Asset Resource Allocation in Transportation Asset Management
40. Essen, H., Fiorello, D., El Beyrouty, K., Bieler, C., and Wijngaarden, L. (2020). Handbook on the External Costs of Transport: Version 2019–1.1, Publications Office of the European Union.
41. Data Analytics in Asset Management: Cost-Effective Prediction of the Pavement Condition Index10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000512 ↗
42. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (2019). Case Studies in Cross-Asset, Multi-Objective Resource Allocation, The National Academies Press.
43. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2015). Defining Cross-Asset Decision Making: A Discussion Paper (TAM ETG), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Report Number: TAM-ETG-2015-PDL-003.
44. (2022, August 26). HDM-4 Software, Available online: https://www.piarc.org/en/PIARC-knowledge-base-Roads-and-Road-Transportation/Road-Safety-Sustainability/Road-Assets-Management/HDM-4-Software.
45. (2022, August 26). RoSy® Road Systems. Available online: http://www.eltrap.co.il/image.ashx?i=603006.pdf&fn=612873-2.pdf.
46. Deformation Properties and Fatigue of Bituminous Mixtures10.1155/2013/701764 ↗
47. Rheology, Deformational Properties and Fatigue of the Asphalt Mixtures10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.578 ↗
48. Tables of stresses, strains and displacements in two-layer elastic systems under various traffic loads
49. The General Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Systems. I10.1063/1.1707558 ↗
50. Contact stresses between an elastic cylinder and a layered elastic solid10.1115/1.3451940 ↗
51. Elastic contact to a coated half-space: Effective elastic modulus and real penetration10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.600 ↗
52. (2003). Bituminous Mixtures—Test Method for Hot Mix Asphalt–Part 24: Resistant to Fatigue (Standard No. BS EN 12697-24:2003).
53. (2022, October 04). Ministerstvo Dopravy České Republiky, Navrhování Vozovek Pozemích Komunikac, TP170. Available online: https://pjpk.rsd.cz/data/USR_001_2_8_TP/TP_170_upraveny_dotisk.pdf.
54. Remek, L., and Valašková, V. (2020). Data Gathering and Evaluation of Tensile Strains Measured in APT with Mathematical Computation Method. Accelerated Pavement Testing to Transport Infrastructure Innovation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-55236-7_46 ↗
55. Stiffness and Fatigue of Asphalt Mixtures for Pavement Construction10.2478/sjce-2018-0010 ↗
56. Decký, M., Drusa, M., Papán, D., and Šrámek, J. (2022). The Relationship between Dynamic and Static Deformation Modulus of Unbound Pavement Materials Used for Their Quality Control Methodology. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15082922 ↗
57. (2018). Road Construction Materials: Unbound Mixtures-Specifications (Standard No. BS EN 13285:2018).
58. (2022, October 04). Ministerstvo Dopravy Pôšt a Telekomunikácií SR, Navrhoivanie Netuhých a Polotuhých Vozoviek, TP3/2009. Available online: https://www.ssc.sk/files/documents/technicke-predpisy/tp/tp_033.pdf.
59. Research Institute of Engineering Constructions (1993). Phase 3 Assessment of Pavement Performance and Its Development, Research Institute of Engineering Constructions. Report no. 05-514-904 04.