journal article·2026-08

Leveraging Inequality‐Constrained Data for Enhanced Liquidus Temperature Prediction in Nuclear Waste Glass Melts

Erick Garcia‐Morado, Xiaonan Lu, Jose Marcial, John D. Vienna, John D. Hedengren

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inequality‐constrained data are frequently discarded in engineering, leading to significant information loss in data‐scarce domains such as nuclear waste glass property modeling. This paper presents a nonparametric censored‐data regression framework based on an ‐norm optimization criterion that leverages slack variables to integrate left‐, right‐, and non‐constrained observations into training. Validation was performed on synthetic data and a neural network (NN) was developed for predicting spinel liquidus temperature () in high‐level nuclear waste glasses. This method improved the coefficient of determination () from 0.5780 to 0.8622 and reduced Mean absolute error (MAE) by 41.73% (i.e., from 54.15 to 31.56°) on deterministic values. The baseline NN failed to satisfy any inequality constraints while the proposed ‐norm NN satisfies 63.64% of the constraints. Ensemble analysis further showed improved uncertainty calibration, reducing Mean Absolute Calibration Error (MACE) from 0.2018 to 0.0906. The proposed framework effectively extracts actionable information from previously unusable data to enhance predictive accuracy, reduce epistemic uncertainty, and improve physical consistency in complex industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Glass properties and applications · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA

Nuclear Science Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/1467‐9469.0017710.1111/1467‐9469.00177 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.03810.1016/j.watres.2017.05.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0169‐7439(01)00186‐110.1016/S0169‐7439(01)00186‐1 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1385‐8947(00)00380‐610.1016/S1385‐8947(00)00380‐6 ↗
5. 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.155710.2903/j.efsa.2010.1557 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.11105110.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.04.01110.1016/j.tifs.2023.04.011 ↗
8. 10.1186/1471‐2369‐15‐14410.1186/1471‐2369‐15‐144 ↗
9. 10.1128/AEM.01203‐1810.1128/AEM.01203‐18 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jspi.2003.07.00410.1016/j.jspi.2003.07.004 ↗
11. 10.1093/imaman/3.4.25910.1093/imaman/3.4.259 ↗
12. 10.1080/00401706.1993.1048503810.1080/00401706.1993.10485038 ↗
13. 10.1109/TSG.2015.238878410.1109/TSG.2015.2388784 ↗
14. 10.1021/es071301c10.1021/es071301c ↗
15. 10.1016/S0009‐2509(97)00101‐210.1016/S0009‐2509(97)00101‐2 ↗
16. 10.2307/228186810.2307/2281868 ↗
17. Regression Models and Life‐Tables10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19980130)17:2<219::AID‐SIM735>3.0.CO;2‐O10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19980130)17:2<219::AID‐SIM735>3.0.CO;2‐O ↗
19. 10.1080/01621459.1995.1047649110.1080/01621459.1995.10476491 ↗
20. 10.1155/2021/930747510.1155/2021/9307475 ↗
21. 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm0832310.1198/jasa.2009.tm08323 ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19970315)16:5<497::AID‐SIM435>3.0.CO;2‐J10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19970315)16:5<497::AID‐SIM435>3.0.CO;2‐J ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19960715)15:13<1387::AID‐SIM268>3.0.CO;2‐R10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0258(19960715)15:13<1387::AID‐SIM268>3.0.CO;2‐R ↗
24. 10.2307/190738210.2307/1907382 ↗
25. 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.165010.1287/mnsc.44.12.1650 ↗
26. 10.1080/02664763.2024.237393310.1080/02664763.2024.2373933 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.10.00210.1016/j.jeconom.2005.10.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.04.01310.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.04.013 ↗
29. 10.3390/pr1011236510.3390/pr10112365 ↗
30. A Tutorial on Conformal Prediction
31. 10.1214/aos/117634455210.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
32. 10.3390/pr608010610.3390/pr6080106 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.00110.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.001 ↗
34. R. E.Gephart A Short History of Hanford Technical Report PNNL‐13605 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 2002).
35. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13243710.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132437 ↗
36. Hamel W. F. · 2006
37. 10.5802/crgeos.11110.5802/crgeos.111 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.03.03910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.03.039 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.2041‐1294.2011.00063.x10.1111/j.2041‐1294.2011.00063.x ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.033 ↗
41. J. D.Vienna G. F.Piepel D.‐S.Kim et al. 2016 Update of Hanford Glass Property Models and Constraints for Use in Estimating the Glass Mass to be Produced at Hanford Technical Report PNNL‐25835 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 2016).10.2172/1772236 ↗
42. 10.1002/asmb.44610.1002/asmb.446 ↗
43. T.Akiba S.Sano T.Yanase T.Ohta andM.Koyama “Optuna: A Next‐Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework ” inProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining(ACM 2019) 2623–2631.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗