journal article·2022-08-22Open access

Risk Analysis of Seaport Construction Project Execution

Magdalena Kaup, Dorota Łozowicka, Karolina Baszak, Wojciech Ślączka, Agnieszka Kalbarczyk-Jedynak

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 16

Abstract

This article concerns the assessment of the level of risk at the stage of construction of a seaport, with particular emphasis on selected adverse incidents that can significantly affect the timeliness of the investment. In this article, the matrix method was used to analyse and evaluate the level of risk, and statistical analysis and case studies were used to identify incidents occurring during the port construction project. This allowed the identification of incidents with the highest probability of occurrence during the port construction process and to determine their impact on environmental pollution and the timeliness and success of the investment. The risk analysis performed identified 15 typical incidents of technical nature. The determined risk level for these incidents is at a moderate level or lower, which can be considered acceptable. For all undesirable incidents the values of probability and loss levels have been averaged, because e.g., a fire can have an extremely different dimension and can cause a different scale of losses. Analysis presented in the paper indicate the need to develop procedures for proceeding during the implementation of significant technical tasks to minimize the level of risk of adverse incidents and their consequences.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Navigation, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Overtopping hazards to port activities: Application of a new methodology to risk management10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.005 ↗
2. How useful is quantitative risk assessment?10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00455.x ↗
3. Safety risks assessment on container terminal using hazard identification and risk assessment and fault tree analysis methods10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.150 ↗
4. Allan, L., Godfrey, P., and Allan, G.M. (2007, January 21–23). Ports as sustainable complex systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Maritime Technological Innovations and Research, Barcelona, Spain.
5. Gucma, S. (2015). Sea Waterways-Design and Operation in Terms of Marine Traffic Engineering: Morskie Drogi Wodne-Projektowanie i Eksploatacja w Ujęciu Inżynierii Ruchu Morskiego, Fundacja Promocji Przemysłu Okrętowego i Gospodarki Morskiej. (In Polish).
6. Nagi, A., Schroeder, M., and Kersten, W. (2021). Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13148035 ↗
7. Green measures for sustainable sea ports: A case study of the sea port in Gdynia
8. Bakar, A., Najihah, N., Guerrero, J.M., Vasquez, J.C., Bazmohammadi, N., Yu, Y., Abusorrah, A., and Al-Turki, Y.A. (2021). A Review of the Conceptualization and Operational Management of Seaport Microgrids on the Shore and Seaside. Energies, 14.10.20944/preprints202110.0300.v1 ↗
9. Budiyanto, M.A., and Fernanda, H. (2020). Risk Assessment of Work Accident in Container Terminals Using the Fault Tree Analysis Method. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8060466 ↗
10. Process hazard analysis, hazard identification and scenario definition: Are the conventional tools sufficient, or should and can we do much better?10.1016/j.psep.2017.01.025 ↗
11. Kishore, E.A. (2013). Formal Safety Assessment in Maritime Industry—Explanation to IMO Guidelines, International Maritime Organization. Class Notes for MTech NA&OE 1st Year.
12. Shakhova, A., Piterskaa, V., Sherstiuka, O., Botsaniuka, V., and Babayev, I. (2021, January 16–18). Mechanisms for the Effective Sharing of Risks of Seaport Concession Projects. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2021), Slavsko, Ukraine.
13. Mahapatra, R., and Kushwaha, N. (2020). Hazards Identifications and Risk Assessment in Port Berth Construction-A Case Study. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. IJERT, 9.10.17577/IJERTV9IS010097 ↗
14. Smalko, Z., Nowakowski, T., and Tubis, A. (2020). Zarys Niezawodnościowej Teorii Zagrożeń, OWPW. (In Polish).
15. Hann, M., Semenov, I.N., and Rosochacki, W. (1998). Wybrane Zagadnienia Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności Obiektów Górnictwa Morskiego, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Politechniki Szczecińskiej. (In Polish).
16. Review: Risk assessment of infrastructure projects on project cost10.1088/1757-899X/495/1/012088 ↗
17. Moreno Parra, N., Nagi, A., and Kersten, W. (2018). Risk Assessment Methods in Seaports: A Literature Review. HAZARD Proj., 24.
18. Risk assessment in public-private partnership infrastructure projects10.1108/CI-08-2016-0043 ↗
19. Application of stress test concepts for port infrastructures against natural hazards. The case of Thessaloniki port in Greece10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.005 ↗
20. Liu, J., Kong, Y., Li, S., and Wu, J. (2021). Sustainability assessment of port cities with a hybrid model-empirical evidence from China. Sustain. Cities Soc., 75.10.1016/j.scs.2021.103301 ↗
21. Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00094-1 ↗
22. Jak zarządzać ryzykiem? Podejście normatywne
23. Kaizer, A., and Neumann, T. (2021). The Model of Support for the Decision-Making Process, While Organizing Dredging Works in the Ports. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14092706 ↗
24. Ciosmak, M. (2021). Properties of the aggressiveness of geothermal and marine water and their negative impact on hydromechanical fittings. Sci. J. Marit. Univ. Szczec., 68.
25. Ball, P., Huaccho Huatuco, L., Howlett, R., and Setchi, R. (2019). The Concept of Location of Filling Stations and Services of Vehicles Carrying and Running on LNG. Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2019, Proceedings of the KES-SDM 2019—Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Budapest, Hungary, 1 February 2019, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-9271-9 ↗
26. Challenges for the future of ports. What can be learnt from the Spanish Mediterranean ports?10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.12.016 ↗
27. Human factors and safety culture: Challenges and opportunities for the port environment10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.008 ↗
28. Jurić, M., Dundović, C., Perić, T., and Jelić Mrčelić, G. (2021). The selection of LNG terminal location based on the evaluation of potential terminal impact on marine environment, safety and costs. Sci. J. Marit. Univ. Szczec., 68.
29. Szaruga, E., Kłos-Adamkiewicz, Z., Gozdek, A., and Załoga, E. (2021). Linkages between Energy Delivery and Economic Growth from the Point of View of Sustainable Development and Seaports. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14144255 ↗
30. Kaup, M. (2017). Wieloaspektowa Ocena Funkcjonowania Jednostek Lądowych Rzeczno-Morskich z Zastosowaniem Modeli Decyzyjnych, OWPW. (In Polish).
31. Semenov, I.N. (2003). Zarządzanie ryzykiem w gospodarce morskiej: Tom I. Zarządzanie Bezpieczeństwem Statków Transportowych i Obiektów Oceanotechnicznych, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Politechniki Szczecińskiej. (In Polish).
32. The Concept of Safe Evacuation From Sea Faring Vessels at the Port of Szczecin in Circumstances Occasioned by Terrorist Threats during Mass Events: Koncepcja bezpiecznej ewakuacji ze statków cumujących w rzeczno-morskim porcie Szczecin w przypadku zagrożenia terrorystycznego podczas trwania imprez masowych
33. (2022, August 14). Regulation of the Minister of Transport and Maritime Economy of June 1, 1998 on Technical Conditions to Be Fulfilled by Maritime Hydrotechnical Structures and Their Location (Dz.U.98.101.645), Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19981010645.
34. Zaki, M.I., and Budiyanto, M.A. (2021). Study on the simulation model of container handling utility at the container terminal. AIP Conf. Proc., 2376.10.1063/5.0063470 ↗
35. Ilmi, A.A., Supriadi, L.S.R., Latief, Y., and Muslim, F. (2020, January 22–23). Development of dictionary and checklist based on Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) at seaport project construction for cost estimation planning. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering Research (ICCER), Surabaya, Indonesia.10.1088/1757-899X/930/1/012007 ↗
36. Survey of research on the optimal design of sea harbours10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.12.004 ↗
37. An Advanced Risk Matrix Analysis Approach for Safety Evaluation at Major Ports in Malaysia