Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Configuration Optimization Approach for Development of Actuator Fault-Tolerant Structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Presently, multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are utilized in numerous applications. Their design governs the system’s controllability and operation performance by influencing the achievable forces and moments produced. However, unexpected causalities, such as actuator failure, adversely affect their controllability, which raises safety concerns about their service. On the other hand, their design flexibility allows further design optimization for various performance requirements, including actuator failure tolerance. Thus, this study proposed an optimization framework that can be employed to design a novel actuator fault-tolerant multirotor UAV configuration. The approach used an attainable moment set (AMS) to evaluate the achievable moment from a multirotor configuration; similarly, standard deviation geometries (SDG) were employed to define performance requirements. Therefore, given a UAV configuration, actuator fault situation, and SDG derived from the designed mission requirement, the suggested optimization framework maximizes the scaling factor of SDG and fits it into the AMS by adjusting the design parameters up to a sufficient margin. The framework is implemented to optimize selected parameters of the Hexacopter-type of parcel delivery multirotor UAV developed by the PNU drone, and a simulation was conducted. The result showed that the optimized configuration of the UAV achieved actuator fault tolerance and operation-performing capability in the presence of a failed actuator.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Guidance and Control Systems · Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Fourlas, G.K., and Karras, G.C. (2021). A Survey on Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control Methods for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Machines, 9.10.3390/machines9090197 ↗
2. Actuator Fault-Tolerant Control Architecture for Multirotor Vehicles in Presence of Disturbances10.1007/s10846-020-01150-y ↗
3. Fault Tolerance Analysis for a Class of Reconfigurable Aerial Hexarotor Vehicles10.1109/TMECH.2020.2993222 ↗
4. Schneider, T., Bouabdallah, S., and Rudin, G.D.K. (2011). Fault-Tolerant Multirotor Systems. [Master’s Thesis, ETH Zurich].
5. Michael, A., Klaus, M.D., Danie, G., and Jan, S. (2012, January 13–16). Design of a Multi Rotor MAV with regard to Efficiency, Dynamics and Redundancy. Proceedings of the AIAA 2012-4779, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
6. Sanjuan, A., Nejjari, F., and Sarrate, R. (2019, January 18–20). Reconfigurability Analysis of Multirotor UAVs under Actuator Faults. Proceedings of the 2019 4th Conference on Control and Fault Tolerant Systems (SysTol), Casablanca, Morocco.10.1109/SYSTOL.2019.8864748 ↗
7. Yang, T., Li, P., Zhang, H., Li, J., and Li, Z. (2018). Monocular Vision SLAM-Based UAV Autonomous Landing in Emergencies and Unknown Environments. Electronics, 7.10.3390/electronics7050073 ↗
8. Wayne, D., Kenneth, A.B., and Roger, B. (2017). Aircraft Control Allocation, Wiley.
9. Wang, B., Shi, W., and Miao, Z. (2015). Confidence Analysis of Standard Deviational Ellipse and Its Extension into Higher Dimensional Euclidean Space. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0118537 ↗
10. Wolfgang, K.H., and Léopold, S. (2015). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Springer.
11. Clarifying the Standard Deviational Ellipse10.1111/j.1538-4632.2002.tb01082.x ↗
12. Jiang, G., and Richard, M.V. (2014, January 27–30). A nonparallel hexrotor UAV with faster response to disturbances for precision position keeping. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, Hokkaido, Japan.10.1109/SSRR.2014.7017669 ↗
13. Zhang, J., Max, S., and Florian, H. (2021). Attainable Moment Set Optimization to Support Configuration Design: A Required Moment Set Based Approach. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083685 ↗
14. Wen, F.H., Hsiao, F.Y., and Shiau, J.K. (2021). Analysis and Management of Motor Failures of Hexacopter in Hover. Actuators, 10.10.3390/act10030048 ↗
15. Executing convex polytope queries on nD point clouds
16. Weisstein, E.W. (2022, May 09). Point-Plane Distance. From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. Available online: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Point-PlaneDistance.html.
17. Denery, T., Ghidella, J., Mosterman, P., and Shenoy, R. (2006, January 21–24). Creating Flight Simulator Landing Gear Models Using Multidomain Modeling Tools. Proceedings of the AIAA Meeting Papers on Disc, (2006-6821), Keystone, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2006-6821 ↗
18. MathWorks Inc. (2020). Simscape MultibodyTM, MathWorks Inc.
19. Application of multibody simulation tool for dynamical analysis of tethered aerostat
20. Sun, W., Zhang, X., Lin, G., Wang, H., and Han, J. (2021, January 15–19). Extreme Maneuvering Control and Planning of Multi-Rotor UAV for High-Speed Invading Target Avoidance. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Real-Time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), Xining, China.10.1109/RCAR52367.2021.9517525 ↗
21. Control and flight test of a tiltrotor unmanned aerial vehicle10.1177/1729881416678141 ↗
22. Hussein, H. (2020). Fault-Tolerant Control of a Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle under Hardware and Software Failures. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Libanaise].
23. Vey, D., and Lunze, J. (2015, January 15–18). Structural reconfigurability analysis of multirotor UAVs after actuator failures. Proceedings of the 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Osaka, Japan.10.1109/CDC.2015.7403017 ↗
24. Emergency Control of AR Drone Quadrotor UAV Suffering a Total Loss of One Rotor10.1109/TMECH.2017.2652399 ↗
25. Analysis and design of a tilted rotor hexacopter for fault tolerance10.1109/TAES.2016.140885 ↗
26. Experimental Validation of a Fault-Tolerant Hexacopter with Tilted Rotors
27. Michieletto, G., Ryll, M., and Franchi, A. (June, January 29). Control of statically hoverable multi-rotor aerial vehicles and application to rotor-failure robustness for hexacopters. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Singapore.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989320 ↗
28. Minimum-time B-spline trajectories with corridor constraints. Application to cinematographic quadrotor flight plans10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.05.022 ↗