journal article·2022-05-20Open access

User Trust Inference in Online Social Networks: A Message Passing Perspective

Yu Liu, Bai Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 10

Abstract

Online social networks are vital environments for information sharing and user interactivity. To help users of online social services to build, expand, and maintain their friend networks or webs of trust, trust management systems have been deployed and trust inference (or more generally, friend recommendation) techniques have been studied in many online social networks. However, there are some challenging issues obstructing the real-world trust inference tasks. Using only explicit yet sparse trust relationships to predict user trust is inefficient in large online social networks. In the age of privacy-respecting Internet, certain types of user data may be unavailable, and thus existing models for trust inference may be less accurate or even defunct. Although some less interpretable models may achieve better performance in trust prediction, the interpretability of the models may prevent them from being adopted or improved for making relevant informed decisions. To tackle these problems, we propose a probabilistic graphical model for trust inference in online social networks in this paper. The proposed model is built upon the skeleton of explicit trust relationships (the web of trust) and embeds various types of available user data as comprehensively-designed trust-aware features. A message passing algorithm, loop belief propagation, is applied to the model inference, which greatly improves the interpretability of the proposed model. The performance of the proposed model is demonstrated by experiments on a real-world online social network dataset. Experimental results show the proposed model achieves acceptable accuracy with both fully and partially available data. Comparison experiments were conducted, and the results show the proposed model’s promise for trust inference in some circumstances.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Access Control and Trust · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Advanced Graph Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligence Telecommunication Software and Multimedia, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · NSFC-General Technology Basic Research Joint Funds

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Trust on the World Wide Web: A Survey10.1561/1800000006 ↗
2. TrueTrust: A feedback-based trust management model without filtering feedbacks in P2P networks10.1007/s12083-019-00742-2 ↗
3. Trust-Based Cloud Machine Learning Model Selection for Industrial IoT and Smart City Services10.1109/JIOT.2020.3022323 ↗
4. TrustTF: A tensor factorization model using user trust and implicit feedback for context-aware recommender systems10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106434 ↗
5. Two Routes to Influence: Integrating Leader-Member Exchange and Social Network Perspectives10.2189/asqu.50.4.505 ↗
6. A Survey of Trust in Social Networks10.1145/2501654.2501661 ↗
7. Searle, J.R., and Willis, S. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality, Simon and Schuster.
8. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.019 ↗
9. Gupta, P., Goel, A., Lin, J., Sharma, A., Wang, D., and Zadeh, R. (2013, January 13–17). WTF: The Who to Follow Service at Twitter. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’13), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1145/2488388.2488433 ↗
10. Who to trust? Applying trust to social commerce
11. Detection of trust links on social networks using dynamic features10.1016/j.physa.2019.121269 ↗
12. A graph-based model to improve social trust and influence for social recommendation10.1007/s11227-017-2196-2 ↗
13. Wu, L., Sun, P., Fu, Y., Hong, R., Wang, X., and Wang, M. (2019, January 21–25). A Neural Influence Diffusion Model for Social Recommendation. Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’19), Paris, France.10.1145/3331184.3331214 ↗
14. Communication-Based Book Recommendation in Computational Social Systems10.1155/2021/6651493 ↗
15. E-retailing ethics and its impact on customer satisfaction and repurchase intention: A cultural and commitment-trust theory perspective10.1108/IntR-10-2014-0244 ↗
16. The spread of true and false news online10.1126/science.aap9559 ↗
17. A most influential node group discovery method for influence maximization in social networks: A trust-based perspective10.1016/j.datak.2019.05.001 ↗
18. Chui, M., Manyika, J., and Bughin, J. (2022, May 14). The Social Economy: Unlocking Value and Productivity through Social Technologies. McKinsey Global Institute. 1 July 2012. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/the-social-economy.
19. Uninorm trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuple information10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.004 ↗
20. A trust-similarity analysis-based clustering method for large-scale group decision-making under a social network10.1016/j.inffus.2020.05.004 ↗
21. A Survey on Trust Prediction in Online Social Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009445 ↗
22. (2022, April 10). General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR). Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation.
23. (2022, April 10). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Consumer_Privacy_Act.
24. (2022, April 10). Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Information_Protection_Law_of_the_People’s_Republic_of_China.
25. Link prediction in directed social networks10.1007/s13278-014-0157-9 ↗
26. Barbieri, N., Bonchi, F., and Manco, G. (2014, January 24–27). Who to Follow and Why: Link Prediction with Explanations. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’14), New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623733 ↗
27. A cost-effective algorithm for inferring the trust between two individuals in social networks10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.027 ↗
28. A unified framework of trust prediction based on message passing10.1007/s10586-018-1807-x ↗
29. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: An experimental study on epinions.com community
30. FilmTrust: Movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks
31. Liu, G., Yang, Q., Wang, H., Lin, X., and Wittie, M.P. (May, January 27). Assessment of multi-hop interpersonal trust in social networks by Three-Valued Subjective Logic. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2014—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/INFOCOM.2014.6848107 ↗
32. Liu, G., Chen, Q., Yang, Q., Zhu, B., Wang, H., and Wang, W. (2017, January 1–4). OpinionWalk: An efficient solution to massive trust assessment in online social networks. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2017—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8057106 ↗
33. Tang, J., Gao, H., Hu, X., and Liu, H. (2013, January 4–8). Exploiting Homophily Effect for Trust Prediction. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM ’13), Rome, Italy.10.1145/2433396.2433405 ↗
34. Yao, Y., Tong, H., Yan, X., Xu, F., and Lu, J. (2013, January 13–17). MATRI: A Multi-Aspect and Transitive Trust Inference Model. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’13), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1145/2488388.2488516 ↗
35. Zheng, X., Wang, Y., Orgun, M., Zhong, Y., and Liu, G. (2014, January 27–31). Trust Prediction with Propagation and Similarity Regularization. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2014, Québec City, QC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8722 ↗
36. Liu, G., Li, C., and Yang, Q. (May, January 29). NeuralWalk: Trust Assessment in Online Social Networks with Neural Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Paris, France.10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737469 ↗
37. A Survey on Trust Modeling10.1145/2815595 ↗
38. A Survey on Trust Evaluation Based on Machine Learning
39. Mukherjee, S., Weikum, G., and Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. (2014, January 24–27). People on Drugs: Credibility of User Statements in Health Communities. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’14), New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623714 ↗
40. Mukherjee, S., and Weikum, G. (2015, January 18–23). Leveraging Joint Interactions for Credibility Analysis in News Communities. Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’15), Melbourne, Australia.10.1145/2806416.2806537 ↗
41. Web of Credit: Adaptive Personalized Trust Network Inference From Online Rating Data10.1109/TCSS.2016.2639016 ↗
42. Liu, H., Lim, E.P., Lauw, H.W., Le, M.T., Sun, A., Srivastava, J., and Kim, Y.A. (2008). Predicting Trusts among Users of Online Communities: An Epinions Case Study, Association for Computing Machinery. EC ’08.10.1145/1386790.1386838 ↗
43. Characterizing super-spreading in microblog: An epidemic-based information propagation model10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.022 ↗
44. Recasens, M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., and Jurafsky, D. (2013, January 4–9). Linguistic models for analyzing and detecting biased language. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria.
45. De Albornoz, J.C., Plaza, L., and Gervás, P. (2012, January 23–25). SentiSense: An easily scalable concept-based affective lexicon for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), Istanbul, Turkey.
46. Friedli, S., and Velenik, Y. (2017). Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Systems: A Concrete Mathematical Introduction, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316882603 ↗
47. Gerhard, L., and Bernhard, N. (2003). Understanding belief propagation and its generalizations. Exploring Artificial Intelligence in the New Millennium, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
48. Liu, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Lv, J., and Wang, B. (2018;, January 28–30). A High Performance Implementation of A Unified CRF Model for Trust Prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), Exeter, UK.10.1109/HPCC/SmartCity/DSS.2018.00141 ↗
49. Bottou, L. (2017, September 16). Stochastic Gradient Descent Examples on Toy Problems. Available online: https://leon.bottou.org/projects/sgd.