Research on an Improved SOM Model for Damage Identification of Concrete Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to solve the problem of intelligent detection of damage of modern concrete structures under complex constraints, an improved self-organizing mapping (SOM) neural network model algorithm was proposed to construct an accurate identification model of concrete structure damage. Based on the structure and algorithm of the SOM network model, the whole process of the core construction of the concrete structure damage identification network model is summarized. Combined with the damage texture characteristics of concrete structures, through the self-developed 3D laser scanning system, an improved method based on a small number of samples to effectively improve the effectiveness of network input samples is proposed. Based on the principle of network topology map analysis and its image characteristics, a SOM model improvement method that can effectively improve the accuracy of the network identification model is studied. In addition, based on the reactive powder concrete bending fatigue loading test, the feasibility and accuracy of the improved method are verified. The results show that the improved SOM concrete structure damage identification model can effectively identify unknown neuron categories in a limited sample space, and the identification accuracy of the SOM network model is improved by 4.69%. The proposed improved SOM model method fully combines the network topology and its unique image features and can accurately identify structural damage. This research contributes to the realization of high-precision intelligent health monitoring of damage to modern concrete structures. In addition, it is of great significance for the timely detection, identification and localization of early damage to structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Medical Technology, BeiHua University, Jilin City 132000, China
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, BeiHua University, Jilin City 132000, China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Carbon coated piezoresistive fiber sensors: From process monitoring to structural health monitoring of composites—A review10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106236 ↗
2. Structural Health Monitoring of Architectural Heritage: From the past to the Future Advances10.1080/15583058.2021.1879499 ↗
3. Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures by using the internet of things: A review10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103954 ↗
4. An introduction to structural health monitoring10.1098/rsta.2006.1928 ↗
5. Pattern recognition and machine learning10.1109/TAC.1974.1100578 ↗
6. Kot, P., Muradov, M., Gkantou, M., Kamaris, G.S., Hashim, K., and Yeboah, D. (2021). Recent Advancements in Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062750 ↗
7. A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111347 ↗
8. Structural Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures using Fibre Optic Based Sensors: A Review10.1680/jmacr.19.00185 ↗
9. A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
10. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–201910.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 ↗
11. Damage identification in underground tunnel structures with wavelet based residual force vector10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.021 ↗
12. Damage detection using self-powered wireless sensor data: An evolutionary approach10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.020 ↗
13. Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 ↗
14. Won, J., Park, J.W., Jang, S., Jin, K., and Kim, Y. (2021). Automated Structural Damage Identification Using Data Normalization and 1-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062610 ↗
15. 1-D CNNs for Structural Damage Detection: Verification on a Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Data10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.069 ↗
16. Lin, C.J., and Wu, N.J. (2021). An ANN Model for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Concrete. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11093798 ↗
17. Investigation on the data augmentation using machine learning algorithms in structural health monitoring information10.1177/1475921721996238 ↗
18. A review of structural health monitoring of bonded structures using electromechanical impedance spectroscopy10.1177/1475921721993419 ↗
19. Negative selection algorithm based methodology for online structural health monitoring10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111662 ↗
20. Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 ↗
21. Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring10.1177/1475921718757405 ↗
22. Rajadurai, R.S., and Kang, S.T. (2021). Automated Vision-Based Crack Detection on Concrete Surfaces Using Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11115229 ↗
23. Convolutional neural network based structural health monitoring for rocking bridge system by encoding time-series into images10.1002/stc.2897 ↗
24. Defect sizing in guided wave imaging structural health monitoring using convolutional neural network10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102480 ↗
25. Deep Convolutional Neural Network Probability Imaging for Plate Structural Health Monitoring Using Guided Waves10.1109/TIM.2021.3127641 ↗
26. Gu, J., Peng, Y., Lu, H., Chang, X., Cao, S., Chen, G., and Cao, B. (2021). An optimized variational mode decomposition method and its application in vibration signal analysis of bearings. Struct. Health Monit., 1–22.10.1177/14759217211057444 ↗
27. Zhan, J., Wang, C., and Fang, Z. (2021). Condition Assessment of Joints in Steel Truss Bridges Using a Probabilistic Neural Network and Finite Element Model Updating. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031474 ↗
28. Finotti, R.P., Barbosa, F.d.S., Cury, A.A., and Pimentel, R.L. (2021). Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Structural Changes Using Sparse Auto-Encoders and SVM Applied to Dynamic Responses. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411965 ↗
29. Damage identification of steel-concrete composite beams based on modal strain energy changes through general regression neural network10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112824 ↗
30. Angulo-Saucedo, G.A., Leon-Medina, J.X., Pineda-Muñoz, W.A., Torres-Arredondo, M.A., and Tibaduiza, D.A. (2022). Damage Classification Using Supervised Self-Organizing Maps in Structural Health Monitoring. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22041484 ↗
31. Sun, J., Chen, X., Fu, Z., and Lacidogna, G. (2021). Damage Pattern Recognition and Crack Propagation Prediction for Crumb Rubber Concrete Based on Acoustic Emission Techniques. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311476 ↗
32. Structural health monitoring using wireless smart sensor network—An overview10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108113 ↗
33. Structural health monitoring of bridges with piezoelectric AE sensors10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.009 ↗
34. Concrete dam deformation prediction model for health monitoring based on extreme learning machine10.1002/stc.1997 ↗
35. Signal Processing Techniques for Vibration-Based Health Monitoring of Smart Structures10.1007/s11831-014-9135-7 ↗
36. Empowering Self-Organized Feature Maps for AI-Enabled Modeling of Fake Task Submissions to Mobile Crowdsensing Platforms10.1109/JIOT.2020.3011461 ↗
37. Research on crack identification and monitoring method of concrete structure based on G-S-G
38. An intelligent model for the prediction of the compressive strength of cementitious composites with ground granulated blast furnace slag based on ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108951 ↗
39. The development and application of an original 3D laser scanning: A precise and nondestructive structural measurements system10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.28 ↗