A Practical Approach for the Mitigation of Seismic-Induced Vibrations in Slender Metallic Structures through Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers
Source abstract
Abstract
The mitigation of seismic-induced vibrations is essential for the effective protection of buildings and occupants during earthquakes. This especially applies to slender buildings with metallic frames; in this case, the structure’s geometrical layout and relatively low damping properties favor an excessive and potentially catastrophic oscillatory response to a seismic event. Semiactive systems for energy dissipation are among the most commonly used strategies to control this oscillatory response. They offer the right balance between the reliability of passive devices and the versatility and adaptability of fully active systems. In this work, a vibration-suppression system based on dissipative bracings that integrate commercial magnetorheological fluid dampers (MRDs) was designed and validated through experimental tests on a true-scale structural model that was representative of a five-story slender building with a metallic frame. A practical and robust approach was proposed for: (1) The definition of the MRD type in compliance with a predefined mitigation target for seismic-induced accelerations on each floor of the structure; (2) The modeling of the MRDs, contribute to the dynamic response of the structural system. The approach involves a linearized formulation of the characteristic damping curves of the MRDs at different values of the activating current. By relying upon this linearization, a rapidly converging iterative process was set up to simulate the seismic response of the structure in the case of activated or deactivated dampers. The reference structure and the vibration-suppression system were then manufactured and tested on a sliding table, which provided realistic seismic excitation. The good correlation levels between the numerical predictions and the experimental measurements proved the effectiveness of the conceived system and of the approaches that were used for its design and simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Industrial Engineering Department, Aerospace Division, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, Italy
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. The European Standard on Anti-Seismic Devices
2. Recent Applications of Italian anti-seismic devices10.2495/ERES090311 ↗
3. Review on seismic isolation and response control methods of buildings in Japan10.1186/s40677-019-0123-y ↗
4. Semiactive Vibration Control Using a Magnetorheological Damper and a Magnetorheological Elastomer Based on the Bouc-Wen Model
5. Olabi, A.-G. (2022). Introduction to Magnetorheological Fluids. Encyclopedia of Smart Materials, Elsevier.
6. Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Meet Electrospinning: Recent Advances and the Key Parameters for High Gravimetric and Volume Energy Density10.1002/advs.202103879 ↗
7. A flexible metallic TiC nanofiber/vertical graphene 1D/2D heterostructured as active electrocatalyst for advanced Li–S batteries10.1002/inf2.12214 ↗
8. Semi Active Control of Civil Structures, Analytical and Numerical Studies10.1016/j.phpro.2014.07.044 ↗
9. Qiao, F., Liu, J., Dai, J., Sun, L., and Guo, H. (2010, January 17–19). Modelling of MRD and Its Application for Seismic Reduction. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Modelling, Identification, and Control, Innsbruck, Austria.
10. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006 ↗
11. Dyke, S.J., Spencer, B.F., Sain, M.K., and Carlson, J.D. (1996, January 1–6). Experimental Verification of Semi-Active Structural Control Strategies using Acceleration Feedback. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Chiba, Japan.
12. Dyke, S.J., and Spencer, B.F. (1997, January 8–10). A Comparison of Semi-Active Control Strategies for the MR Damper. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems, Bahama Island, Bahamas.
13. Jansen, L.M., and Dyke, S.J. (1999, January 13–16). Investigation of Nonlinear Control Strategies for the Implementation of Multiple Magnetorheological Dampers. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA.
14. Ying, Z.G., Ni, Y.Q., and Ko, J.M. (2002, January 28). Non-Clipping Optimal Control of Randomly Excited Nonlinear Systems using Semi-Active ER/MR dampers. Proceedings of the SPIE, Smart Systems and Materials-Smart Systems for Bridges Structures and Highways, the International Society for Optical Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.472556 ↗
15. Active control of a tall structure excited by wind10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00073-2 ↗
16. Hiemenz, G.J., Choi, Y.-T., and Wereley, N.M. (2000, January 20). Seismic Control of Civil Structures Utilizing Semi-Active MR Bracing Systems. Proceedings of the SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials: Smart Systems for Bridges Structures and Highways, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1117/12.383141 ↗
17. Li, J., Samali, B., and Ha, G. (2002, January 20–23). Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control of a Five Story Benchmark Model Equipped with Active Mass Driver (AMD). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Saitama, Japan.10.1299/jsmeintmovic.6.1.172 ↗
18. Ni, Y.Q., Liu, H.J., and Ko, J.M. (2002, January 28). Experimental Investigation on Seismic Response Control of Adjacent Buildings using Semi-Active MR Dampers. Proceedings of the SPIE, Smart Systems and Materials-Smart Systems for Bridges Structures and Highways, the International Society for Optical Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.472570 ↗
19. Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/309 ↗
20. Fuzzy logic semi-active vibration control
21. Fuzzy sliding-mode control of structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.007 ↗
22. (2022, March 01). Website of the Consortium of the University Laboratories of Seismic and Structural Engineering. Available online: https://www.reluis.it/.
23. (2022, March 01). European Commision, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance; BS EN 1998 SET; European Publication Office. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/91658.
24. (2022, March 01). Femap® Website. Available online: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/.
25. An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators10.6028/jres.045.026 ↗
26. (2022, February 03). Matlab® Website. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/.
27. Cremer, L., and Heckl, M. (1988). Stucture-Borne Sound, Springer. Chapter 4.10.1007/978-3-662-10121-6 ↗
28. Bobrowsky, P.T. (2013). High-Rise Buildings in Natural Disaster. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4 ↗
29. Lalanne, C. (2009). Mechanical Vibration and Shock Analysis. Mechanical Shock, Wiley. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9780470611937 ↗
30. Srinivasan, A.V., and Mc Farland, D.M. (2010). Smart Structures, Analysis and Design, Cambridge University Press. Chapter 4.
31. (2022, March 02). LORD® MRD-1005-3 Datasheet. Available online: https://www.lord.com/.
32. (2022, March 02). ENEA Resarch Center. Available online: https://www.casaccia.enea.it/.
33. (2022, March 02). Siemens LMS Scadas/Test-Lab®. Available online: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/it/products/simcenter/scadas.html.
34. Girard, A., and Roy, N. (2003). Dynamique des Structrues Industrielles, Hermes Science Publications.