journal article·2022-01-26Open access

Study on the Influence of a Soft Soil Interlayer on Spatially Varying Ground Motions

Erlei Yao, Weichao Li, Yu Miao, Lin Ye, Zhaowei Yang

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

The existence of local soft interlayer can significantly amplify or attenuate the ground motion and thus might influence the lagged spatial coherency between spatially varying earthquake ground motions. A target site with a local soft interlayer was assumed first, and then two numerical examples were set. In example 1, linear soil behavior was considered and a large amount of quasi-stationary spatially varying earthquake ground motions were generated by combining the one-dimensional wave propagation theory and the classical spectral representation method. The influence regularity of varying shear wave velocity, buried depth, and thickness of the soft interlayer on the characteristics of lagged spatial coherency was investigated. In example 2, non-linear soil behavior was taken into account and fully non-stationary spatially varying earthquake ground motions were thus generated by using time-varying transfer function and spectral representation method. An overall evaluation was carried out to shed light on the differences of characteristics of spatial coherency between non-linear soil and linear soil cases. It showed that: (i) As the shear wave velocity of interlayer declines and as the buried depth and thickness increase, remarkable reduction of spatial coherency showed up; (ii) the reduction of lagged spatial coherency caused by varying buried depth may be more inclined to concentrate in the lower frequency range; (iii) the non-linear soil behavior can cause greater further reduction of lagged spatial coherency in comparison with linear soil behavior, especially in the higher frequency range; (iv) the troughs of lagged spatial coherency curve tend to be located in the variation range of vibration frequency of time-varying spectral ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of the Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China

School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Scientific research operating expenses of the central Government

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion10.1002/eqe.4290140606 ↗
2. Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable stayed bridges10.1002/eqe.4290210101 ↗
3. Response of long span bridges to spatially varying ground motion
4. Response of an earth dam to spatially varying earthquake ground motion10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:9(932) ↗
5. A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motion including the site response effect10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00080-4 ↗
6. Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.016 ↗
7. Saxena, V., Deodatis, G., and Shinozuka, M. (February, January 30). Effect of spatial variation of earthquake ground motion on the nonlinear dynamic response of highway bridges. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
8. Earthquake response of arch dams to spatially varying ground motion10.1002/eqe.974 ↗
9. Numerical simulation of pounding damage to bridge structures under spatially varying ground motions10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.012 ↗
10. Seismic response of shield tunnel subjected to spatially varying earthquake ground motions10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.006 ↗
11. On the Influence of Shallow Underground Structures in the Evaluation of the Seismic Signals
12. Site amplification effects of a radially multi-layered semi-cylindrical canyon on seismic response of an earth and rockfill dam10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.014 ↗
13. An exact solution for SH-wave scattering by a radially multi-layered inhomogeneous semi-cylindrical canyon10.1093/gji/ggz083 ↗
14. Simulation of fully nonstationary spatially variable ground motions on a canyon site10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.030 ↗
15. Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time
16. Stochastic process models of earthquake ground motion10.1016/0266-8920(88)90023-9 ↗
17. Multiple–station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART–1 array date10.1016/0029-5493(89)90241-0 ↗
18. Non–stationary stochastic vector processes: Seismic ground motion applications10.1016/0266-8920(96)00007-0 ↗
19. Synthesis of spatially correlated ground motions at varying sites based on Vector-valued Seismic Hazard Deaggregation10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.009 ↗
20. Improved hilbert spectral representation method and its application to seismic analysis of shield tunnel subjected to spatially correlated ground motions10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.050 ↗
21. Simulation of Spatially Varying Ground Motions in V-shaped Symmetric Canyons
22. Simulation of Spatially Varying Non–Gaussian and Nonstationary Seismic Ground Motions by the Spectral Representation Method10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001371 ↗
23. A modified spectral representation method to simulate non-Gaussian random vector process considering wave-passage effect10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109587 ↗
24. How the distribution characteristics of soil property affect probabilistic foundation settlement: From the view of the first four statistical moments10.1139/cgj-2019-0089 ↗
25. Wavelet–based generation of spatially correlated accelerograms10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.05.005 ↗
26. Influences of irregular topography and random soil properties on coherency loss of spatial seismic ground motions10.1002/eqe.1077 ↗
27. Ancheta, T.D., Stewart, J.P., and Abrahamson, N.A. (2011, January 23–26). Engineering characterization of earthquake ground motion coherency and amplitude variablity. Proceedings of the 4th International IASPEI Symposium on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion 2011, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
28. The SMART I Accelerograph Array 1980–1987, A Review10.1193/1.1585428 ↗
29. Empirical Spatial Coherency Functions for Application to Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses10.1193/1.1585610 ↗
30. Abrahamson, N. (2007). Program on Technology Innovation: Spatial Coherency Models for Soil-Structure Interaction.
31. Abrahamson, N. (2006). Program on Technology Innovation: Effects of Spatial Incoherence on Seismic Ground Motions, ERPI. Report No. EPRI 1015110 2006.
32. Coherency analysis of accelerograms recorded by the UPSAR array during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake10.1002/eqe.2362 ↗
33. Effects of site geometry on short-distance spatial coherency in Argostoli, Greece10.1007/s10518-017-0270-z ↗
34. A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions
35. The influence of site conditions on the spatial incoherence of ground motions10.1016/0167-4730(91)90003-R ↗
36. Effects of spatially variable ground motions on the seismic response of a skewed, multi-span, RC-highway bridge10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.016 ↗
37. Liao, S., Zerva, A., and Stephenson, W.R. (2007). Seismic spatial coherency at a site with irregular subsurface topography. Probabilistic Applications in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE.10.1061/40914(233)11 ↗
38. Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.09.002 ↗
39. The indirect boundary integral equation method for the broadband scattering of plane P, SV and Rayleigh waves by a hill topography10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.09.018 ↗
40. The scattering of plane P, SV waves by twin lining tunnels with imperfect interfaces embedded in an elastic half-space10.1016/j.tust.2018.12.024 ↗
41. Online earthquake response test for stratified layers of clay and sand10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(611) ↗
42. Importance of seismic site response and soil-structure interaction in dynamic behavior of a tall building10.1680/geot.SIP.15.P.016 ↗
43. Numerical modeling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:6(336) ↗
44. Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake10.1038/37586 ↗
45. Nonlinear and linear site response and basin effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake10.1785/0120010254 ↗
46. Hysteretic and dilatant behavior of cohesionless soils and their effects on nonlinear site response: Field data observations and modeling10.1785/0120040128 ↗
47. Temporal changes in site response associated with the strong ground motion of the 2004 Mw6.6 mid-Niigata earthquake sequences in Japan10.1785/0120090108 ↗
48. Assessing nonlinear behavior of soils in seismic site response: Statistical analysis on KiK-net strong-motion data
49. Five parameters for the evaluation of the soil nonlinearity during the Ms8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake using the HVSR method10.1186/s40623-017-0702-7 ↗
50. In Situ assessment of soil dynamic parameters for characterizing nonlinear seismic site response using KiK-net vertical array data
51. Numerical study on site response considering ground motion spatial variation10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105836 ↗
52. Simulation of fully non-stationary spatially varying ground motions considering nonlinear soil behavior10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105954 ↗
53. Wolf, J.P. (1988). Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis in Time Domain, Prentice Hall.
54. Simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes10.1007/s11803-011-0055-3 ↗
55. Clough, R.W., and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of Structures, McGraw Hill. [2nd ed.].
56. Probabilistic seismic analysis of a steel frame structure10.1016/0266-8920(93)90006-H ↗
57. Sobczky, K. (1991). Stochastic Wave Propagation, Kluwer Academic Publishers.