Geosynthetic Interface Friction at Low Normal Stress: Two Approaches with Increasing Shear Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The evaluation of geosynthetic interface friction is a key parameter for the stability of coupled geosynthetics, as in landfill capping liner. At the present time, few types of tests are suitable for measuring the interface friction at low normal stress: one of these is the inclined plane, usually carried out under a vertical stress of 5 kPa. This type of test is not without critical aspects, mainly due to the nonuniform normal stress state induced by the inclination of the plane, but, on the other hand, the most widespread direct shear test generally cannot be performed at such low values of normal stress. After a short discussion on the pros and cons of these two types of test, the paper presents a comparison of the interface friction angles obtained, for three interfaces, by means of an inclined plane and an unconventional direct shear apparatus, under the same low normal stress. The peculiarity of this latter device is of ensuring a gradual increase of the mobilized strength, in a way similar to what occurs during the inclined plane test. The good correspondence of the results of the two types of tests confirmed the validity of both the test approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ICEA Department, University of Padua, 35129 Padova, Italy
DICEAM, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Soil–Geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003 ↗
2. Soil geosynthetic interaction: Design parameters from experimental and theoretical analysis10.1007/s40515-014-0007-2 ↗
3. Shear strength characterization of geosynthetic interfaces on inclined planes10.1520/GTJ11240J ↗
4. Use of the inclined plane test in measuring geosynthetic interface friction relationship10.1680/gein.2003.10.5.165 ↗
5. Interface shear strength of geosynthetics: Evaluation and analysis of inclined plane tests10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.05.003 ↗
6. Dry friction behaviour of a geosynthetic interface using inclined plane and shaking table tests10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.05.002 ↗
7. Landfill liner interface strengths from torsional ring shear tests10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:3(597) ↗
8. HDPE geomembrane/geotextile interface shear strength10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:3(197) ↗
9. Moss, A., and Anderson, L. (2000, January 5–8). Cylinder direct shear: A new test method. In Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems Using Geosynthetics. Proceedings of the Geo-Denver 2000, Denver, CO, USA.10.1061/40515(291)7 ↗
10. ASTM D 5321-8 (2008). Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic or Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method, ASTM International.
11. EN ISO 12957-1 (2018). Geosynthetics—Determination of Friction Characteristics—Part 1: Direct Shear Test, International Organization for Standardization.
12. EN ISO 12957-2 (2005). Geosynthetics—Determination of Friction Characteristics—Part 2: Inclined Plane Test, International Organization for Standardization.
13. Dynamics-based interpretation of the interface friction test at the inclined plane10.1680/gein.2004.11.6.439 ↗
14. The characterisation of geosynthetic interface friction by means of the inclined plane test10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.10.027 ↗
15. A new procedure for measuring geosynthetic friction with an inclined plane10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.04.002 ↗
16. Carbone, L., Pavanello, P., Carrubba, P., Briançon, L., and Scotto, M. (2014, January 21–25). Geosynthetic interface shear strength under static and seismic loading conditions. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Berlin, Germany.
17. Geomembrane—Geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests10.1016/S0266-1144(00)00002-9 ↗
18. Ferreira, F.B., Vieira, C.S., and Lopes, M.L. (2016, January 8–11). Soil-geosynthetic interface strength properties from inclined plane and direct shear tests—A comparative analysis. Proceedings of the 6th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics: Geosynthetics for Infrastructure Development, New Delhi, India.
19. Determination of geomembrane–Protective geotextile friction angle: An insight into the shear rate effect10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.007 ↗
20. Slope stability of lining systems-experimental modeling of friction at geosynthetic interfaces10.1016/S0266-1144(02)00009-2 ↗
21. Interaction between soils and geosynthetic layers in large-scale ramp tests10.1680/gein.9.0214 ↗
22. Methodological aspects in the experimental measurement of the interface friction between geosynthetics10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.439 ↗
23. Pavanello, P., Carrubba, P., Moraci, N., and Pezzano, P. (2018, January 16–21). Some aspects concerning the laboratory evaluation of geosynthetic interface friction. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Seoul, Korea.
24. Wear resistance of geosynthetic interfaces constituted by geomembranes and geospacers10.1590/S0370-44672013000200014 ↗