Applying Machine Learning Models to First Responder Collisions Beside Roads: Insights from “Two Vehicles Hit a Parked Motor Vehicle” Data
Source abstract
Abstract
First responders including firefighters, paramedics, and police officers are among the first to respond to vehicle collisions on roads and highways. Police officers conduct regular roadside Please check if the country name is correct traffic controls and checks on urban and rural roads, and highways. Once first responders begin such operations, they are vulnerable to motor vehicle collisions by oncoming traffic, a circumstance that calls for a better understanding of contributing factors and the extent to which they affect tragic outcomes. In light of factors identified in the literature, this paper applies machine learning methods including decision tree and random forest to a subset of the National Collision Database (NCDB) of Canada that includes information on collisions between two vehicles (one in parked position) and the severity of these collisions as measured by having or not having injuries. Findings reveal that key measurable, predictable, and sensible factors such as time, location, and weather conditions, as well as the interconnections among them, can explain the severity of collisions that may happen between motor vehicles and first responders who are working alongside the roads. Analysis from longitudinal data is rich and the use of automated methods can be used to predict and assess the risk and vulnerability of first responders while responding to or operating on different roads and conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ADERSIM, School of Administrative Studies, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
Ale-Taha Institute of Higher Education, Tehran 1488836164, Iran
Sheridan College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Oakville, ON L6H 2L1, Canada
A.U.G. Signals Ltd., Toronto, ON M5H 4E8, Canada
Funding
Defence Research and Development Canada
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2017). Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted.
2. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2018). Law Enforcement Officers Accidentally Killed- Type of Accident and Activity of Victim Officer at Time of Incident.
3. International Association of Fire Fighters (2010). Best Practices for Emergency Vehicle and Roadway Operations Safety in the Emergency Services, International Association of Fire Fighters.
4. Risk factors for injury in law enforcement officer vehicle crashes10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2015-0027 ↗
5. US Fire Administration (2012). Traffic Incident Management Systems.
6. Fahy, R., and Molis, J. (2019). Firefighter Fatalities in the United States, National Fire Protection Association.
7. Factors affecting the road safety
8. Factors affecting road crash modeling10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v9n2a3 ↗
9. Factors influencing the occurrence of traffic accidents in urban roads: A combined gis-empirical bayesian approach10.15446/dyna.v83n195.47229 ↗
10. A field data analysis of risk factors affecting the injury risks in vehicle-to-pedestrian crashes
11. Vodden, K., Smith, D., Eaton, F., and Mayhew, D. (2007). Analysis and Estimation of the Social Cost of Motor Vehicle Collisions in Ontario: Final Report, Transport Canada.
12. Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: Case-crossover study10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13770-1 ↗
13. Factors contributing to the severity of intersection crashes10.1002/atr.5670410303 ↗
14. Savolainen, P.T., Dey, K.C., Ghosh, I., Karra, T.L., and Lamb, A. (2009). Investigation of Emergency Vehicle Crashes in the State of Michigan, Purdue University.
15. Ambulance crash characteristics in the US defined by the popular press: A retrospective analysis10.1155/2010/525979 ↗
16. Yasmin, S., Anowar, S., and Tay, R. (2014). Injury Risk of Traffic Accidents Involving Emergency Vehicles in Alberta, University of Calgary.
17. Digital billboards and road safety10.2495/LIGHT110111 ↗
18. The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: A systematic literature review10.1080/15389588.2014.936407 ↗
19. Bui, D.P., Pollack Porter, K., Griffin, S., French, D.D., Jung, A.M., Crothers, S., and Burgess, J.L. (2017). Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: Process, outputs, and recommendations. BMC Public Health, 17.10.1186/s12889-017-4894-3 ↗
20. Factors associated with civilian drivers involved in crashes with emergency vehicles10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.035 ↗
21. Preventing emergency vehicle crashes: Status and challenges of human factors issues10.1177/0018720818786132 ↗
22. Large and small cars in real-world crashes -patterns of use, collision types and injury outcomes
23. Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes10.1023/A:1007649804201 ↗
24. NHTSA (2018). Occupant Fatalities in Law Enforcement Vehicles Involved in Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes.
25. Dumont, E., Brémond, R., and Hautière, N. (2008, January 12–18). Night-time visibility as a function of headlamps beam patterns and pavement reflection properties. Proceedings of the VISION 2008, Marseille, France.
26. Farber, G. (2004). Seeing with Headlights.
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020, August 24). Impaired Driving: Get the Facts-BAC Effects, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/transportationsafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html.
28. Pinizzotto, A., Davis, E., and Miller, C. (2002). Accidentally Dead: Accidental Line-of-Duty Deaths of Law Enforcement Officers.10.1037/e320552004-002 ↗
29. (2019, June 18). Transport Canada National Collision Database 1999 to 2017. Available online: https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/1eb9eba7-71d1-4b30-9fb1-30cbdab7e63a.
30. Using logistic regression to estimate the influence of accident factors on accident severity10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00073-2 ↗
31. Diagnostic analysis of the logistic model for pedestrian injury severity in traffic crashes10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.017 ↗
32. Analysis of the traffic injury severity on two-lane, two-way rural roads based on Classification tree models10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.019 ↗
33. analysis of powered two-wheeler crashes in italy by classification trees and rules discovery10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.025 ↗
34. Analyzing traffic crash severity in work zones under different light conditions10.1155/2017/5783696 ↗
35. Efficient and Robust Automated Machine Learning
36. Carvalho, D.V., Pereira, E.M., and Cardoso, J.S. (2019). Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8080832 ↗
37. Statistics Canada (2020, June 15). Table 20-10-0001-01 New Motor Vehicle Sales, Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=2010000101.
38. (2021, March 29). Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Fatality Facts 2018, Gender. Available online: https://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/general-statistics/fatalityfacts/gender.
39. Analysis of driver injury severity in truck-involved accidents using a non-parametric classification tree model10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.017 ↗