Potential Imaging Capability of Optical Coherence Tomography as Dental Optical Probe: A Mini-Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been emerging in the dental field as an alternative diagnostic imaging for “optical probes” owing to its micro-meter resolution and non-invasiveness. This review aims to answer the following question: what is the imaging capability of OCT to visualize the subgingival area? Online searches were performed on PubMed and SPIE digital library databases, followed by a manual screening of references listed in relevant studies. The feasibility and imaging performance of OCT to visualize the subgingival area, including the periodontal, peri-implant, and crown margins, are discussed. All of the literature reviewed in this study demonstrated that OCT has the ability to visualize periodontal, including hard and soft tissues, and peri-implant conditions with high resolution. Gingival sulcus depth, periodontal pocket, and calculus deposition can also be depicted. However, clinical evidence that support the imaging capability of OCT as a dental optical probe to visualize subgingival area is lacking. Limited availability, portability, and usability of OCT for clinical experiments in dentistry, particularly for the subgingival area, might be contributed to its limitations. Hence, further development of handheld OCT systems and controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm the imaging capability of OCT reported in this review.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical Coherence Tomography Applications · Retinal and Macular Surgery · Glaucoma and retinal disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-0875, Japan
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia
Funding
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. In vivo OCT imaging of hard and soft tissue of the oral cavity10.1364/OE.3.000239 ↗
2. Bille, J.F. (2019). Optical coherence tomography (OCT): Principle and technical realization. High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-16638-0 ↗
3. The use of optical coherence tomography in dental diagnostics: A state-of-the-art review10.1155/2017/7560645 ↗
4. High resolution X-ray computed tomography: An emerging tool for small animal cancer research10.1038/sj.neo.7900069 ↗
5. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: Essence, elements and steps to interpretation10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x ↗
6. Detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth using swept source optical coherence tomography10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.016020 ↗
7. Detection and analyzing plane of non-cavitated approximal caries by cross-polarized optical coherence tomography (CP-OCT)10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103679 ↗
8. Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of caries, cracks, and defects of restorations10.1007/s40496-015-0045-z ↗
9. Evaluation of dental caries, tooth crack, and age-related changes in tooth structure using optical coherence tomography10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.001 ↗
10. Dental optical coherence tomography: New potential diagnostic system for cracked-tooth syndrome10.1007/s00276-015-1514-8 ↗
11. Assessment of interfacial defects at composite restorations by swept source optical coherence tomography10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076018 ↗
12. Assessment of defects at tooth/self-adhering flowable composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.005 ↗
13. Sensing of tooth microleakage based on dental optical coherence tomography10.1155/2015/984627 ↗
14. Ability of optical coherence tomography to detect caries beneath commonly used dental sealants10.1002/lsm.20963 ↗
15. An update on novel non-invasive approaches for periodontal diagnosis10.1902/jop.2009.090419 ↗
16. Non-invasive periodontal probing through fourier-domain optical coherence tomography10.1902/jop.2015.150047 ↗
17. Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracies of optical coherence tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histology in periodontal disease: Anex vivostudy10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.30 ↗
18. Improved accuracy in periodontal pocket depth measurement using optical coherence tomography10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.13 ↗
19. In vivo assessment of periodontal structures and measurement of gingival sulcus with Optical Coherence Tomography: A pilot study10.1002/jbio.201600082 ↗
20. Observation and determination of periodontal tissue profile using optical coherence tomography10.1111/jre.12506 ↗
21. Classification of human gingival sulcus using swept-source optical coherence tomography: In vivo imaging10.1016/j.infrared.2019.03.005 ↗
22. Optical coherence tomography follow-up of patients treated from periodontal disease10.1002/jbio.201800209 ↗
23. Handheld optical coherence tomography for clinical assessment of dental plaque and gingiva10.1117/1.JBO.25.11.116011 ↗
24. Subgingival calculus imaging based on swept-source optical coherence tomography10.1117/1.3602851 ↗
25. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x ↗
26. Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 201510.1111/clr.12648 ↗
27. CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose: A systematic review
28. Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study10.1111/jcpe.12491 ↗
29. Probing at implants with peri-implantitis and its relation to clinical peri-implant bone loss10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02470.x ↗
30. Discomfort/pain due to periodontal and peri-implant probing: Implant type and age10.1111/jcpe.12741 ↗
31. Discomfort/pain due to periodontal and peri-implant probing with/without platform switching10.1111/clr.13513 ↗
32. The effectiveness of optical coherence tomography for evaluating peri-implant tissue: A pilot study10.5624/isd.2016.46.3.173 ↗
33. Quantitative measurement of peri-implant bone defects using optical coherence tomography10.5051/jpis.2018.48.2.84 ↗
34. The glossary of prosthodontic terms: Ninth edition
35. The marginal fit of E.max Press and E.max CAD lithium disilicate restorations: A critical review10.4012/dmj.2016-008 ↗
36. Assessment of the adaptation of interim crowns using different measurement techniques10.1111/jopr.13122 ↗
37. Wu, J., Xie, H., Sadr, A., and Chung, K.-H. (2021). Evaluation of internal fit and marginal adaptation of provisional crowns fabricated with three different techniques. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030740 ↗
38. OCT evaluation of single ceramic crowns: Comparison between conventional and chair-side CAD/CAM technologies10.1117/12.2191907 ↗
39. Dental optical coherence tomography: A comparison of two in vitro systems10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600507 ↗
40. Optical coherence tomography in the 2020s—Outside the eye clinic10.1038/s41433-020-01263-6 ↗
41. Lai, Y.-C., Lin, J.-Y., Yao, C.-Y., Lyu, D.-Y., Lee, S.-Y., Chen, K.-W., and Chen, I.-Y. (2019). Interactive OCT-based tooth scan and reconstruction. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19194234 ↗
42. Erdelyi, R.-A., Duma, V.-F., Sinescu, C., Dobre, G., Bradu, A., and Podoleanu, A. (2021). Optimization of X-ray investigations in dentistry using optical coherence tomography. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21134554 ↗