Estimating Critical Latency Affecting Ship’s Collision in Re-Mote Maneuvering of Autonomous Ships
Source abstract
Abstract
Estimation of the critical latency that can cause collision in remote maneuvering of autonomous ships can provide a clue to avoid collisions. The concept of estimating the critical latency was established using the turning circle formed by the turning maneuver of the own ship, and critical latency was estimated using the radius of the turning circle with the turning time ratio. The turning circle was observed using the turning trajectory of the give-way vessel measured in the ship maneuvering simulation experiment. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method is capable of identifying both the location and time of the collision due to critical latency. As a result, a clue to avoid possible collision in remote maneuvering caused by critical latency was deduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Navigation Convergence Studies, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-Ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea
Division of Marine Production System Management, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-Ro, Nam-Gu, Busan 48513, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. IMO (2018, May 31). IMO Takes First Steps to Address Autonomous Ship. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/08-MSC-99-MASS-scoping.aspx.
2. IMO (2021). MSC.1/Circ.1638 of 3June 2021 “Outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface, Ships (MASS).
3. DNV-GL (2018). Autonomous and Remotely Operated Ships, DNV-GL.
4. ClassNK (2020). Guidelines for Automated/Autonomous Operation on Ships (Ver. 1.0), ClassNK.
5. VTMIS (2020). EU Operational Guidelines for Safe, Secure and Sustainable Trials of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), European Union.
6. Rolls-Royce plc (2016). Remote and Autonomous Ships the Next Steps, Rolls-Royce plc. AAWA Position Paper.
7. Wariishi, K. (2019). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: Development Trends and Prospects–How Digitalization Drives Changes in Maritime Industry, Mitsui & Co. Global Strategic Studies Institute. Mitsui & Co. Global Strategic Studies Institute Monthly Report.
8. Chen, Y.Y., Ellis-Tiew, M., Chen, W., and Wang, C. (2021). Fuzzy risk evaluation and collision avoidance control of unmanned surface vessels. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146338 ↗
9. A method for protocol-based collision avoidance between autonomous marine surface craft10.1002/rob.20121 ↗
10. IMO (1972). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, International Maritime Organization.
11. Inoue, K. (2013). Theory and Practice of Ship Handling, Kobe University.
12. Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006 ↗
13. Human factors in seafaring: The role of situation awareness10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.018 ↗
14. Embrey, D. (2005). Understanding Human Behaviour and Error, Human Reliability Associates.
15. Modeling perceived collision risk in vessel encounter situations10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.003 ↗
16. A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain10.1017/S0373463306003833 ↗
17. Lee, H.J., Furukawa, Y., and Park, D.J. (2021). Seafarers’ awareness-based domain modelling in restricted areas. J. Navig., 1–17.10.1017/S0373463321000394 ↗
18. A target information display for visualizing collision avoidance manoeuvres in various visibility conditions10.1017/S0373463315000296 ↗
19. An analysis of domain-based ship collision risk parameters10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.08.030 ↗
20. Review of ship safety domains: Models and applications10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.020 ↗
21. Ship domain applied to determining distances for collision avoidance manoeuvres in give-way situations10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.041 ↗
22. The effect of water immersion on vection in virtual reality10.1038/s41598-020-80100-y ↗
23. Assessment of a critical area for a give-way ship in a collision encounter10.5604/08669546.1169212 ↗
24. Towards the assessment of critical area in a collision encounter accounting for stability conditions of a ship
25. Tactile Internet for autonomous vehicles: Latency and reliability analysis10.1109/MWC.2019.1800553 ↗
26. A novel approach for assistance with anti-collision decision making based on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea
27. A new method of planning collision avoidance manoeuvres for multi-target encounter situations10.1017/S0373463307004638 ↗
28. A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and Collision Alert Systems10.1016/j.ress.2021.107766 ↗
29. A big data analytics method for the evaluation of ship-ship collision risk reflecting hydrometeorological conditions10.1016/j.ress.2021.107674 ↗
30. A novel analytical framework for dynamic quaternion ship domains10.1017/S0373463312000483 ↗
31. Planar motion mechanism tests and full-scale steering and manoeuvring predictions for a Mariner class vessel10.3233/ISP-1965-1212902 ↗
32. Identification of ship steering dynamics10.1016/0005-1098(76)90064-9 ↗
33. Maneuvering of large tankers
34. (2021, June 16). K-SIM Navigation. Available online: https://www.kongsberg.com/digital/products/maritime-simulation/k-sim-navigation/.
35. Clifford, G.J. (2019). Chapter 12-The sailings. American Practical Navigator: An Epitome of Navigation, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
36. A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas10.1017/S0373463300035220 ↗
37. Traffic capacity10.1017/S0373463300022384 ↗
38. A statistical study of ship domains10.1017/S0373463300041230 ↗
39. Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters10.1017/S0373463300039783 ↗