Effect of mechanical activation of electroexplosive Al 2 O 3 nanopowder on the characteristics of sintered ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Aluminum oxide‐based materials exhibit significant potential for application in the aerospace industry, advanced manufacturing technologies, the automotive industry, power engineering, and other fields. However, the inherent brittleness of aluminum oxide limits its broader application. Therefore, an ongoing search is underway for methods to produce corundum ceramics with high mechanical properties, including the use of Al 2 O 3 nanopowders. This paper is the first to investigate the production of corundum ceramics using Al 2 O 3 nanopowder obtained by electric explosion of wire. The effect of mechanical activation of the nanopowder on characteristics of the sintered samples is appreciated. It is found that pre‐treatment of the nanopowder in a high‐speed planetary ball mill within 2 min facilitates the compaction of sintered ceramics up to a density of 3.85 g/cm 3 , which is 96% of the theoretical density. The highest strength under radial compression of the ceramic samples is achieved with a crystallite size of about 46 nm. A general relationship between the strength and mechanical activation time is similar to the Hall–Petch relationship.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Research Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia
Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPMS SB RAS) Tomsk Russia
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk Russia
Funding
Russian Science Foundation
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.04010.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.040 ↗
2. Eswara Prasad N · 2016 · 415
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.21610.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.216 ↗
4. 10.36724/2664‐066X‐2024‐10‐4‐51‐6210.36724/2664‐066X‐2024‐10‐4‐51‐62 ↗
5. 10.1002/1521‐4125(200110)24:10<1005::AID‐CEAT1005>3.0.CO;2‐010.1002/1521‐4125(200110)24:10<1005::AID‐CEAT1005>3.0.CO;2‐0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mseb.2009.03.02110.1016/j.mseb.2009.03.021 ↗
7. RogojanR AndronescuE GhitulicaC VasileBS.Synthesis and characterization of alumina nano‐powder obtained by sol–gel method.UPB Sci Bull Ser B: Chem Mater Sci.2011;73(2):67‐76.
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.04410.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.044 ↗
9. Microwave‐assisted synthesis of alumina nanoparticles using some plants extracts
10. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2020.10007610.1016/j.mtnano.2020.100076 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12847610.1016/j.matlet.2020.128476 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.12.01510.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.12.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.03510.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.035 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.00710.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.007 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1982.tb10511.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1982.tb10511.x ↗
16. 10.1038/srep1157510.1038/srep11575 ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1440310.1111/jace.14403 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.06610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.066 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2005.00654.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2005.00654.x ↗
20. LiaoSC ChenYJ KearBH MayoWE.High‐pressure/low‐temperature sintering of nanocrystalline alumina. In:Abstracts of the 4th International Conference on Nanostructured Materials June 14–19.Elsevier Science Ltd;1998:207.
21. 10.1016/S0955‐2219(01)00285‐010.1016/S0955‐2219(01)00285‐0 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11148‐017‐0020‐410.1007/s11148‐017‐0020‐4 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00331‐110.1016/S0965‐9773(99)00331‐1 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11182‐016‐0789‐510.1007/s11182‐016‐0789‐5 ↗
25. 10.1016/0001‐6160(53)90006‐610.1016/0001‐6160(53)90006‐6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.07810.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.078 ↗
27. 10.1111/jace.1666810.1111/jace.16668 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apt.2018.04.02910.1016/j.apt.2018.04.029 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.110 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mseb.2009.03.02110.1016/j.mseb.2009.03.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.00710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.007 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.00410.1016/j.dental.2015.12.004 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.16910.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.169 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11694010.1016/j.actamat.2021.116940 ↗
35. 10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2010.1310.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2010.13 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.15910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.159 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.19310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.193 ↗
38. 10.17586/2220-8054-2023-14-1-107-11110.17586/2220-8054-2023-14-1-107-111 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359‐6454(98)00144‐X10.1016/S1359‐6454(98)00144‐X ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12688610.1016/j.matlet.2019.126886 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.07360610.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.073606 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10853‐008‐2936‐z10.1007/s10853‐008‐2936‐z ↗
43. 10.1007/s11661‐024‐07600‐810.1007/s11661‐024‐07600‐8 ↗
44. ZhangX HuangX.The splitting test method on dynamic tensile strength of Al2O3ceramic material. InICEM 2008: International Conference on Experimental Mechanics vol.7375.SPIE;2008:1356–1360.https://doi.org/10.1117/12.83936110.1117/12.839361 ↗
45. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1996.tb08962.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1996.tb08962.x ↗
46. 10.1016/S0965‐9773(98)00125‐110.1016/S0965‐9773(98)00125‐1 ↗
47. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1959.tb13596.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1959.tb13596.x ↗