XCT damage evaluation and analysis of SiC/SiC turbine guide vanes after thermal shocks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, the two‐dimensional (2D) (0°/90°) plain‐woven Amosic‐3 SiC/SiC turbine guide vane (TGV) was fabricated using the chemical vapor infiltration method. Thermal and stress analysis of the TGV was conducted using the finite element method analysis. Multiple thermal shock tests at T = 1250, 1350, 1400, 1420, 1450, 1470, and 1480°C were conducted for N = 100, 100, 400, 300, 200, 200, and 700 cycles. After thermal shock tests, the surface damage of the TGV was observed visually, and the micro damage mechanism was analyzed using the scanning electronic microscopy. Micro X‐ray computed tomography was adopted to characterize the internal damages in the SiC/SiC guide vanes. The delamination occurred at the positions approaching internal hollow, due to the weak binding force along the thickness direction and the high thermal shock stress caused by the temperature change. The diameter, area, volume, and sphericity distributions of the pores inside of the guide vanes were also obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an P. R. China
Xi'an Xinyao Ceramic Composite Materials Co., Ltd. Xi'an P. R. China
College of Civil Aviation Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-981-13-1783-510.1007/978-981-13-1783-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00230‐610.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00230‐6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.006 ↗
4. Li LB · 2020
5. 10.1002/978352783179110.1002/9783527831791 ↗
6. 10.14062/j.issn.0454‐5648.2021111110.14062/j.issn.0454‐5648.20211111 ↗
7. 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20220407.00110.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20220407.001 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1420610410.3390/ma14206104 ↗
9. VedulaV ShiJ JarmonD OchsS OniL LawtonT et al.Ceramic matrix composite turbine vanes for gas turbine engines. In:Proceedings of GT 2005 ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land Sea and Air.Reno‐Tahoe Nevada USA;2005.https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005‐6822910.1115/GT2005-68229 ↗
10. WatanabeF NakamuraT MizokamiY.Design and testing for ceramic matrix composite turbine vane. In:Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition GT2017.Charlotte NC USA;2017.https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2017‐63264
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.05.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2007.05.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.07.03810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.07.038 ↗
13. 10.1080/09276440.2021.196067810.1080/09276440.2021.1960678 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.003 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2009.02449.x10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2009.02449.x ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2011.04802.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2011.04802.x ↗
17. 10.1007/s10443‐019‐09778‐210.1007/s10443‐019‐09778‐2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10989910.1016/j.matdes.2021.109899 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11340‐022‐00916‐910.1007/s11340‐022‐00916‐9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.17610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.176 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.008 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11666‐007‐9128‐210.1007/s11666‐007‐9128‐2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.05.05110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.05.051 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00339‐008‐4536‐910.1007/s00339‐008‐4536‐9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10639010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106390 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.02010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.020 ↗
27. 10.1002/adem.20050009210.1002/adem.200500092 ↗
28. 10.1080/09276440.2019.168528110.1080/09276440.2019.1685281 ↗