Crossline Reconstruction of 3D Seismic Data Using 3D cWGAN: A Comparative Study on Sleipner Seismic Survey Data
Source abstract
Abstract
In seismic data acquisition, data loss can occur, particularly with the use of streamer systems in marine seismic exploration. These systems often cause spatial aliasing problems by having close inline intervals and wide crossline intervals to maximize the exploration range. To improve the resolution of seismic data in the crossline direction, various machine learning techniques have been employed for crossline data reconstruction. In this study, we introduce a 3D cWGAN (conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network) for interpolating 3D seismic data. We evaluate the model’s performance by comparing it with 2D cWGAN and 3D U-Net. In this study, two interpolation strategies are employed to reconstruct missing data in the crossline direction. The first strategy uses a 2D network, which trains a model using inline data and applies the trained model to the crossline direction via 2D cWGAN. The second strategy employs a 3D network, which uses the 3D volume of the seismic data directly via 3D cWGAN and 3D U-Net. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using the Sleipner CO2 4D seismic survey dataset. Our results show that the 3D cWGAN is more efficient in enhancing resolution and computation compared to the 2D cWGAN or 3D U-Net.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea CCUS Association (K-CCUS) · Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST)
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Research Trend analysis for Seismic Data Interpolation Methods using Machine Learning
2. Deep learning for irregularly and regularly missing data reconstruction10.1038/s41598-020-59801-x ↗
3. Seismic data interpolation using a fast generalized Fourier transform10.1190/1.3511525 ↗
4. Seismic data interpolation with conditional generative adversarial network in time and frequency domain
5. Consecutively Missing Seismic Data Interpolation Based on Coordinate Attention Unet
6. Coarse-Refine Network with Upsampling Techniques and Fourier Loss for the Reconstruction of Missing Seismic Data10.1109/TGRS.2022.3190292 ↗
7. Seismic data interpolation beyond aliasing using regularized nonstationary autoregression10.1190/geo2010-0231.1 ↗
8. Seismic data interpolation using CycleGAN
9. Deep Prior-Based Unsupervised Reconstruction of Irregularly Sampled Seismic Data10.1109/LGRS.2020.3044455 ↗
10. DTAE: Deep Tensor Autoencoder for 3-D Seismic Data Interpolation
11. Depthwise separable convolution Unet for 3D seismic data interpolation10.3389/feart.2022.1005505 ↗
12. Comparison of Seismic Data Interpolation Performance using U-Net and cWGAN
13. Generative adversarial nets
14. Mirza, M., and Osindero, S. (2014). Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv.
15. Zhu, J.Y., Park, T., Isola, P., and Efros, A.A. (2017, January 22–29). Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.244 ↗
16. Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., and Bottou, L. (2017, January 17). Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australia.
17. Auto-painter: Cartoon image generation from sketch by using conditional wasserstein generative adversarial networks10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.045 ↗
18. Ebenezer, J.P., Das, B., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019, January 2–6). Single image haze removal using conditional wasserstein generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), A Coruña, Spain.10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8902992 ↗
19. Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., and Efros, A.A. (2017, January 21–26). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 ↗
20. De-aliased seismic data interpolation using conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial networks10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104801 ↗
21. Prescribing a System of Random Variables by Conditional Distributions10.1137/1115049 ↗
22. Villani, C. (2008). Optimal Transport: Old and New, Springer Science & Business Media. Available online: https://cedricvillani.org/sites/dev/files/old_images/2012/08/preprint-1.pdf.
23. Proposing Effective Regularization Terms for Improvement of WGAN
24. (2020, October 01). Sleipner 4D Seismic Database. Available online: https://co2datashare.org/dataset/sleipner-4d-seismic-dataset.
25. Spatial and temporal evolution of injected CO2 at the Sleipner field, North Sea
26. 20 years of monitoring CO2-injection at Sleipner10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1523 ↗
27. Applying Spitz Trace Interpolation Algorithm for Seismic Data