journal article·2024-01Open access

Effect of surface treatment upon luminous efficiency of YAG: Ce ceramics

Yanan Li, Haitao Zhang, Junrong Ling, Jian Yang, Wentao Xu, Youfu Zhou, Maochun Hong

Abstract

Abstract For high‐power white light‐emitting diode devices (WLEDs), phosphor ceramics were widely used because of their high thermal conductivity and temperature resistance. In this study, Y 2.998 Al 5 O 12 : 0.002Ce 3+ ceramics were prepared via vacuum reaction sintering and treated by silicon carbide (SiC) abrasives with particle sizes of 8.6, 20, 25, 34, and 50 μm to obtain a single textured surface. The transmittance, reflectance, luminous efficiency (LE) and photoluminescence (PL) intensity of the ceramics were investigated with various surface roughness and different placement. Compared with the double polished (DP) samples, the PL intensity and LE of the single‐surface textured ceramics were greatly improved. It was shown that the roughest ceramics placed with the single polished (SP) side facing the direction of the excitation light (the SP‐forward YAG: Ce ceramics) showed the best performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Materials Science Fujian Normal University Fuzhou China

Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials Chemistry and Physics Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences Fuzhou China

Fujian Science and Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China Fuzhou China

Funding

Fujian Science and Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.05510.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.055 ↗
2. 10.1039/C9TC03916C10.1039/C9TC03916C ↗
3. 10.1039/D0TC00032A10.1039/D0TC00032A ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.02710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.027 ↗
5. 10.1021/cm803076810.1021/cm8030768 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2003.08.01810.1016/j.jpcs.2003.08.018 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40145-019-0346-010.1007/s40145-019-0346-0 ↗
8. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0021010.3389/fmats.2020.00210 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.04.07110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.04.071 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.03610.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.036 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.01.26610.1016/j.jlumin.2006.01.266 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.05.00310.1016/j.pecs.2016.05.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.microrel.2014.03.01410.1016/j.microrel.2014.03.014 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.13310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.133 ↗
15. 10.1143/JJAP.48.12021010.1143/JJAP.48.120210 ↗
16. 10.2109/jcersj2.118.12810.2109/jcersj2.118.128 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.12.01910.1016/j.jlumin.2012.12.019 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10854-017-7574-210.1007/s10854-017-7574-2 ↗
19. 10.1002/lpor.20130014010.1002/lpor.201300140 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16608310.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166083 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.06710.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.067 ↗
22. 10.1364/OME.7.00105510.1364/OME.7.001055 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.11410.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.114 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.13810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.138 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.26810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.268 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.14510.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.145 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0051210.1021/acsaelm.0c00512 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12548610.1016/j.cej.2020.125486 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.07910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.079 ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03726.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03726.x ↗
32. 10.1364/OE.23.01792310.1364/OE.23.017923 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03624.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03624.x ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.05810.1016/j.jlumin.2019.05.058 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10853-018-2874-310.1007/s10853-018-2874-3 ↗