Application of natural hydroxyapatite in the treatment of polluted water: Utilization of dromedary bone as bioadsorbent
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the dromedary bone waste was valorized by the obtainment of hydroxyapatite (HAp) and its application to remove crystal violet (CV) dye from aqueous solution. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, elemental analysis X‐ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF), particle size laser analysis, and the point of zero charge pH value (pHpzc) were realized to characterize the natural adsorbent. The capacity of HAp to adsorb CV was measured at different contact times, pH values, and initial dye concentrations. The results showed that the model that better described the experimental data of adsorption kinetics was the pseudo‐second‐order kinetic model (PSO). Freundlich model well fitted the sorption isotherms. A maximum sorption capacity of 266.66 mg/g of CV dye on natural HAp was obtained. Hence, dromedary bone treated might be valorized as a natural adsorbent for water treatment with low environmental risks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Characterization and Valorization of Natural Resources Department of Biological Sciences Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahim University Bordj Bou Arreridj Algeria
Mechanical Research Center (CRM) Constantine Algeria
Department of Chemistry Institute of Biological and Exact Sciences Group of Organic and Environmental Chemistry Federal University of Ouro Preto Minas Gerais Brazil
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4314/ijbcs.v12i1.4310.4314/ijbcs.v12i1.43 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62220-210.1016/S1001-0742(08)62220-2 ↗
3. 10.3390/nano706013710.3390/nano7060137 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.01710.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.017 ↗
5. 10.1080/09593330.2013.87135210.1080/09593330.2013.871352 ↗
6. 10.1080/19443994.2015.107462110.1080/19443994.2015.1074621 ↗
7. 10.4236/jwarp.2016.8303010.4236/jwarp.2016.83030 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.01410.1016/j.jece.2015.12.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.09810.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.098 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.10510.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.105 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.08.00310.1016/j.micromeso.2015.08.003 ↗
12. 10.1260/0263-6174.30.1.8110.1260/0263-6174.30.1.81 ↗
13. 10.1260/0263-6174.31.6.53510.1260/0263-6174.31.6.535 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.14510.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.145 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.07110.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.071 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00521-810.1016/S0043-1354(01)00521-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00017-110.1016/S0304-3894(02)00017-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.12010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.120 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.02010.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.02010.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00025-610.1016/S0143-7208(02)00025-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.02.00810.1016/j.ceramint.2009.02.008 ↗
23. Characterisation of natural hydroxyapatite extracted from bovine cortical bone ash
24. 10.1039/C6RA08715A10.1039/C6RA08715A ↗
25. Viandes & Produits Carnés
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.08110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.081 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.04310.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.043 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-013-7864-x10.1007/s10853-013-7864-x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.03.00310.1016/j.msec.2008.03.003 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.04110.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.041 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.04.00110.1016/j.ceramint.2006.04.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.07.03310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.07.033 ↗
33. Characterisation of natural hydroxyapatite extracted from bovine cortical bone ash
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.07.01610.1016/j.ceramint.2010.07.016 ↗
35. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.829.31410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.829.314 ↗
36. 10.1177/088532821663389210.1177/0885328216633892 ↗
37. CriniG BadotPM GuibalE (eds).Chitine et chitosane—du biopolymère à l’application. PUFC France Besançon 2009; p 303.
38. About the theory of so‐called adsorption of soluble substances
39. 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-510.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 ↗
40. 10.1061/JSEDAI.000043010.1061/JSEDAI.0000430 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00551-410.1016/S0021-9797(03)00551-4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.07.01610.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.07.016 ↗
43. 10.1080/0959333220861823510.1080/09593332208618235 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.00210.1016/j.desal.2007.12.002 ↗
45. 10.1080/00986445.2013.83663310.1080/00986445.2013.836633 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja02242a00410.1021/ja02242a004 ↗
47. 10.1088/2053-1591/aaaac210.1088/2053-1591/aaaac2 ↗
48. The adsorption of Crystal violet from aqueous solution by using potato peels (Solanum tuberosum): equilibrium and kinetic studies
49. Adsorption of crystal violet dye by Fugas Sawdust from aqueous solution
50. Assessment of adsorption kinetics for removal potential of crystal violet dye from aqueous solutions using Moroccan pyrophyllite
51. 10.1002/app.4182810.1002/app.41828 ↗
52. Adsorption of crystal violet dye from aqueous solution onto zeolites from coal fly and bottom ashes
53. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.04910.1016/j.cej.2012.04.049 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.10710.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.107 ↗
55. 10.1021/ie060257r10.1021/ie060257r ↗