On temperature‐dependent interfacial fracture energy/stress intensity factor and matrix cracking in ceramic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The first matrix cracking stress is a crucial indicator to appraise the mechanical properties of ceramic‐matrix composites, which is the starting point of permanent damage. Based on the classic energy balance method and stress intensity method, two temperature‐dependent first matrix cracking stress models of fiber‐reinforced ceramic matrix composites are established, respectively. The model established by the energy balance method considers the evolution of interfacial fracture energy with temperature, and the model established by the stress intensity method takes into account the evolution of stress intensity factor with temperature. The predictions of the above models in a wide temperature range are verified using experimental data available in the literature, which shows the rationality and accuracy of the above models. Moreover, on the basis of the energy balance method model, the main factors controlling the first matrix cracking stress at different temperatures are analyzed by the numbers. Finally, in view of the analysis results, some suggestions on how to optimize and enhance the first matrix cracking stress at different temperatures are put forward.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control Chongqing University Chongqing China
College of Aerospace Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing China
Institute of Advanced Structure Technology Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.021 ↗
2. Review on mechanics of ultra‐high‐temperature materials
3. 10.1007/BF0117153210.1007/BF01171532 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04863.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04863.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.13010.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.130 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.11810.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.118 ↗
7. Development of high temperature materials including CMCs for space application
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 ↗
9. GyekenyesiJZ JaskowiakMH.High temperature mechanical characterization and analysis of Al2O3/Al2O3 composition.1999.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237768407_High_Temperature_Mechanical_Characterization_and_Analysis_of_A12O3A12O3_Composites
10. Gyekenyesi J · 1998
11. AvestonJ.The properties of fiber composites. In: Conference Proceedings of National Physical Lab.Guildford:IPC Science and Technology Press November 4 1971.
12. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-510.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-5 ↗
13. 10.1098/rspa.1987.001910.1098/rspa.1987.0019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.03310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.06310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.063 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.00310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.07.01210.1016/j.jmps.2017.07.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00078-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00078-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.04410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.25410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.254 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06211.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06211.x ↗
22. 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00028-610.1016/S0955-2219(02)00028-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-5096(86)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(86)90035-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.02510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.025 ↗
25. Zhang H · 2009
26. 10.1111/ijac.1320410.1111/ijac.13204 ↗
27. 10.1111/ijac.1286410.1111/ijac.12864 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06171.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06171.x ↗
29. Ye D · 1981
30. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06115.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06115.x ↗