Direct ink writing of silicone/filler mixtures for sphene scaffolds with advanced topologies
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Pastes based on preceramic polymers have a great potential for direct ink writing of bioceramic scaffolds. In this paper, we discuss the fabrication of phase pure sphene (CaTiSiO 5 ) bioceramics, developed by firing, at 1300°C, of silicone‐based printed scaffolds containing CaCO 3 and TiO 2 as active fillers. As a proof of the flexibility of the combination of preceramic polymers and additive manufacturing technologies, several lattice geometries of increasing complexity were successfully explored. In particular, the approach allowed the fabrication of sphene scaffolds with gyroid‐like structure exhibiting an impressive compressive strength, given the high porosity. Moreover, different lattice topologies of sphene scaffolds were compared also in terms of permeability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering University of Padova Padova Italy
Refractories, Ceramics and Building materials Department National Research Centre Cairo Egypt
Department of Civil Engineering University of Padova Padova Italy
Department of Materials Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1527-2648(200006)2:6<339::AID-ADEM339>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1527-2648(200006)2:6<339::AID-ADEM339>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03876.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03876.x ↗
3. 10.3390/ma703192710.3390/ma7031927 ↗
4. Additive manufacturing of ceramics from liquid feedstocks
5. Additive manufacturing techniques for fabricating complex ceramic components from preceramic polymers
6. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/2/02500810.1088/1758-5090/7/2/025008 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40145-021-0484-z10.1007/s40145-021-0484-z ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11047010.1016/j.matdes.2022.110470 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1002015310.3390/ma10020153 ↗
10. 10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/03200110.1088/1748-6041/8/3/032001 ↗
11. 10.1111/ijac.1357710.1111/ijac.13577 ↗
12. 10.1002/adem.20180090010.1002/adem.201800900 ↗
13. 10.1111/jace.1594810.1111/jace.15948 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.02010.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.82004030910.1002/jbm.820040309 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.122634010.1126/science.1226340 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep1946810.1038/srep19468 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01382.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01382.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.03010.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.030 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.01.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.01.030 ↗
25. 10.1111/jace.1370010.1111/jace.13700 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3162310.1002/jbm.a.31623 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.00510.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.005 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1111223410.3390/ma11112234 ↗
29. 10.1098/rsif.2008.027410.1098/rsif.2008.0274 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.10.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.10.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.10.03410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.10.034 ↗
32. 10.1111/jace.1421310.1111/jace.14213 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.03810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.038 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.10410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.104 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0025-5408(98)00005-110.1016/S0025-5408(98)00005-1 ↗
36. 10.3389/fbioe.2015.0015110.3389/fbioe.2015.00151 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.016 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.01610.1016/j.msec.2016.06.016 ↗
40. 10.1111/ijag.1610610.1111/ijag.16106 ↗
41. Synthesis of nano‐structured sphene and optimization of the mechanical properties of its scaffold via response surface methodology
42. Gibson LJ · 1999
43. 10.1586/erd.09.310.1586/erd.09.3 ↗
44. Innocentini MDM · 2005 · 31310.1002/3527606696.ch4b ↗