Failure Analysis of Modern Silicon Dice
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the utilization of silicon dice in electronic devices has been in place for approximately 50 years, its widespread application has occurred more recently with the rapid expansion of the consumer markets for digital devices such as cameras, personal computers, video players, and smart phones. In particular, due to the recent market drive in the miniaturization and cost reduction of electronic products, silicon dice are often utilized without encapsulation and mounted directly to the substrate by means of conductive adhesives or BGA mounting. Silicon die often need to be thinned to a few hundred micrometers thickness to fit into compact devices and to reduce parasitics. The intrinsic brittle nature of silicon in combination with the lack of mechanical protection such as encapsulation has made fracture of bare dice a typical failure mechanism in handheld electronic devices. In the current work, we tested to failure {100} silicon dice and obtained mirror–mist boundary measurements for correlation to the fracture strengths of the parts. This work will also present various practical examples of how to reliably conduct failure analysis of fractured silicon dice. The intrinsic brittle nature of silicon in combination with the lack of mechanical protection such as encapsulation has made fracture of bare dice a typical failure mechanism in handheld electronic devices such as cameras, portable computers, tablets, media players, and smart phones. In these products, silicon dice are often utilized without encapsulation and are attached directly to the substrate by means of conductive adhesives or ball grid array mounting. Modern silicon dice used in these products typically have small dimensions and higher flexural strength compared to their predecessors. Prior silicon fractographic findings have investigated low strength failures. In the current work, we extend the quantitative fractography of silicon to the high failure stress regime. We have mechanically tested modern silicon dice to failure by four‐point bending and obtained mirror–mist boundary measurements for correlation to the fracture strengths of the specimens. Two key areas are addressed which improve the practical application of quantitative fractography to modern silicon dice: (1) application of silicon fractography to high flexural strength regimes and (2) development of a systematic means of reliably measuring fracture surface features.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UM‐Shanghai Jiao Tong University – Joint Institute Shanghai China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0003571710.1007/BF00035717 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.microrel.2008.03.00310.1016/j.microrel.2008.03.003 ↗
3. D. Y. R.Chong W. E.Lee B. K.Lim J. H.L Pang andT. H.Low “Mechanical Characterization in Failure Strength of Silicon Dice ” 9th Intersociety Conference in Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems 2203–210(2004).
4. R.DugnaniandM.Wu “Fracture Mechanisms for Silicon Dice ”International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis San Jose McEnery Convention Center San Jose CA November 14‐19 2009 309–313(2009).
5. 10.1016/j.microrel.2006.09.00210.1016/j.microrel.2006.09.002 ↗
6. Fracture Toughness of Silicon
7. 10.1557/JMR.1991.124810.1557/JMR.1991.1248 ↗
8. 10.1557/JMR.1990.224410.1557/JMR.1990.2244 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb07955.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb07955.x ↗
10. ASTM C158‐02 · 2002
11. Probabilistic Strength of {1 1 1} n‐Type Silicon
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19053.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19053.x ↗
13. Practical Analysis of Fractures in Glass Window
14. Quinn G. D. · 2006 · 960
15. 10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00314-110.1016/S0026-2714(02)00314-1 ↗
16. Effect of Dicing Technique on the Fracture Strength of Si Dies With Emphasis on Multi‐Modal Failure Distribution
17. 10.1115/1.153593410.1115/1.1535934 ↗