journal article·2023-09-22Open access

The Detection of False Data Injection Attack for Cyber–Physical Power Systems Considering a Multi-Attack Mode

Buxiang Zhou, Xuan Li, Tianlei Zang, Yating Cai, Jiale Wu, Shijun Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

Amidst the evolving communication technology landscape, conventional distribution networks have gradually metamorphosed into cyber–physical power systems (CPPSs). Within this transformative milieu, the cyber infrastructure not only bolsters grid security but also introduces a novel security peril—the false data injection attack (FDIA). Owing to the variable knowledge held by cyber assailants regarding the system’s network structure, current achievements exhibit deficiencies in accommodating the detection of FDIA across diverse attacker profiles. To address the historical data imbalances encountered during practical FDIA detection, we propose a dataset balancing model based on generating adversarial network-gated recurrent units (GAN-GRU) in conjunction with an FDIA detection model based on the Transformer neural network. Harnessing the temporal data extraction capabilities of gated recurrent units, we construct a GRU neural network system as the GAN’s generator and discriminator, aimed at data balance. After preprocessing, the balanced data are fed into the Transformer neural network for training and output classification to discern distinct FDIA attack types. This model enables precise classification amidst varying FDIA scenarios. Validation involves testing the model on load data from the IEEE 118-bus system and affirming its high accuracy and effectiveness in detecting power systems after multiple attacks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

Intelligent Electric Power Grid Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

Funding

the National Science Foundation of China · National Key R&D Program of China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Review on Cyber-Physical and Cyber-Security System in Smart Grid: Standards, Protocols, Constraints, and Recommendations10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103540 ↗
2. A Systems and Control Perspective of CPS Security10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.04.011 ↗
3. TOTAL: Optimal Protection Strategy Against Perfect and Imperfect False Data Injection Attacks on Power Grid Cyber–Physical Systems10.1109/JIOT.2020.3009330 ↗
4. The 2015 Ukraine Blackout: Implications for False Data Injection Attacks10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631891 ↗
5. False Data Injection Attacks against State Estimation in Electric Power Grids10.1145/1952982.1952995 ↗
6. False Data Injection Attack (FDIA): An Overview and New Metrics for Fair Evaluation of Its Countermeasure10.1186/s40294-020-00070-w ↗
7. A Review of False Data Injection Attacks Against Modern Power Systems10.1109/TSG.2015.2495133 ↗
8. A Survey on the Detection Algorithms for False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids10.1109/TSG.2019.2949998 ↗
9. Li, X., Li, X., and Lu, Z. (2023). Static Detection of False Data in the Power Grid by Fusing Structure and Attributes of Node. J. Electr. Eng. Technol., 1–12.10.1007/s42835-023-01494-z ↗
10. Coordinated attack model of cyber-physical power system consisering false load data injection
11. Secure MPC/ANN-Based False Data Injection Cyber-Attack Detection and Mitigation in DC Microgrids10.1109/JSYST.2021.3086145 ↗
12. Detection and Isolation of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids via Nonlinear Interval Observer10.1109/JIOT.2019.2916670 ↗
13. Preventing False Data Injection Attacks in LFC System via the Attack-Detection Evolutionary Game Model and KF Algorithm10.1109/TNSE.2022.3199881 ↗
14. Cui, J., Gao, B., and Guo, B. A Novel Detection and Defense Mechanism against False Data Injection Attack in Smart Grids. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2023. Early View.10.1049/gtd2.12848 ↗
15. Online False Data Injection Attack Detection With Wavelet Transform and Deep Neural Networks10.1109/TII.2018.2825243 ↗
16. KFRNN: An Effective False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grid Based on Kalman Filter and Recurrent Neural Network10.1109/JIOT.2021.3113900 ↗
17. Detection of False Data Injection Attacks on Power Systems Using Graph Edge-Conditioned Convolutional Networks10.1186/s41601-023-00287-w ↗
18. A Novel Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Online Anomaly Detection in Smart Power Grid10.1155/2023/6166738 ↗
19. An Unsupervised Cyberattack Detection Scheme for AC Microgrids Using Gaussian Process Regression and One-class Support Vector Machine Anomaly Detection10.1049/rpg2.12753 ↗
20. Fast Economic Dispatch with False Data Injection Attack in Electricity-Gas Cyber–Physical System: A Data-Driven Approach10.1016/j.isatra.2022.12.009 ↗
21. Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid Based on Joint Dynamic and Static State Estimation10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3273730 ↗
22. Power System Dynamic State Estimation: Motivations, Definitions, Methodologies, and Future Work10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2894769 ↗
23. Mode, G.R., Calyam, P., and Hoque, K.A. (2019). False Data Injection Attacks in Internet of Things and Deep Learning Enabled Predictive Analytics. arXiv.10.1109/NOMS47738.2020.9110395 ↗
24. Locational Detection of the False Data Injection Attack in a Smart Grid: A Multilabel Classification Approach10.1109/JIOT.2020.2983911 ↗
25. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. (2014). On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches. arXiv.10.3115/v1/W14-4012 ↗
26. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2023). Attention Is All You Need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
27. MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168 ↗
28. He, Y., Li, L., Qian, H., and Yao, S. (2022, January 16). CNN-GRU Based Fake Data Injection Attack Detection Method for Power Grid. Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Science (IC2ECS), Nanjing, China.10.1109/IC2ECS57645.2022.10087906 ↗
29. Zhao, Y., Jia, X., An, D., and Yang, Q. (2020, January 16). LSTM-Based False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grids. Proceedings of the 2020 35th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Zhanjiang, China.10.1109/YAC51587.2020.9337674 ↗
30. Deep Learning for Online AC False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grids: An Approach Using LSTM-Autoencoder10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103178 ↗
31. Chen, Z., Zhu, J., Li, S., and Luo, T. (2020, January 18). Detection of False Data Injection Attack in Automatic Generation Control System with Wind Energy Based on Fuzzy Support Vector Machine. Proceedings of the IECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore, Singapore.10.1109/IECON43393.2020.9255020 ↗
32. Cabelin, J.D., Alpano, P.V., and Pedrasa, J.R. (2021, January 13). SVM-Based Detection of False Data Injection in Intelligent Transportation System. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICOIN50884.2021.9333942 ↗
33. Detection of False Data Injection Attack in Power Information Physical System Based on SVM–GAB Algorithm10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.290 ↗