journal article·2023-04-27Open access

Greenhouse Residues’ Potential for Biogas Production

Kleio Gioulounta, Maria Matska, Arsenios Piskilopoulos, Katerina Stamatelatou

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Agricultural residues are intensively evaluated as potential feedstocks for biogas plants. Vegetable crops generate massive residues during and at the end of their growing seasons. A greenhouse facility in Greece, Thrace Greenhouses S.A., generates 7000–8000 t per year of residual green biomass, resulting from the hydroponic cultivation of tomatoes and cucumbers on 170,000 m2 of land from February to November. The crop residues included leaves, suckers, and stalks. The biochemical methane potential (BMP) estimation was realized on samples taken in March, May, and August, as well as at the end of cultivation (November). Suckers, leaves, and stalks of both plants yielded a range of 221–357, 210–296, and 225–250 NL kg−1 VS, respectively. t-test statistical analysis showed that the BMP of the leaves and suckers were statistically different for tomato and cucumber plants. The BMP of stalks was lower than the other residue types except for the tomato leaves. The diauxic behavior of the specifi‘1c methane production curves indicated that the two-phase Gompertz model (TGM) was the most suitable. The model fitting showed that leaves and suckers, in spite of having a higher BMP than the stalks, exhibited a lower maximum specific methane production rate constant than the stalks during the first phase, which may indicate the presence of inhibitory or slowly biodegradable compounds in leaves and suckers in comparison to the stalks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Bioenergy crop production and management · Biofuel production and bioconversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67132 Xanthi, Greece

Thrace Greenhouses S.A., 67200 Evlalo, Greece

Funding

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation · Thrace Greenhouses SA

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Eurostat (2023, March 29). Gross Electricity Production by Fuel, EU, 2000–2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Electricity_and_heat_statistics.
2. IEA (2020). Outlook for Biogas and Prospects for Organic Growth World Energy Outlook Special Report Biomethane, IEA.
3. Agro-industrial wastes and their utilization using solid state fermentation: A review10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z ↗
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2018). FAOSTAT: Agricultural Land–Area by Country, FAO.
5. Hellenic Statistical Authority (2022, November 21). Vegetables Areas and Production by Region and Regional Unity. Available online: https://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SPG06/-.
6. Biogas production potential from cotton wastes10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.018 ↗
7. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031 ↗
8. Contributions of open crop straw burning emissions to PM2.5 concentrations in China10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014014 ↗
9. Sharratt, B., and Auvermann, B. (2014). Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, Elsevier.
10. Size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon particulate emission factors from agricultural burning10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.043 ↗
11. Grazing of crop residues: Impacts on soils and crop production10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.018 ↗
12. Uneven crop residue distribution influences soil chemical composition and crop yield under long-term no-tillage10.1016/j.still.2022.105498 ↗
13. The valorization of the anaerobic digestate from the organic fractions of municipal solid waste: Challenges and perspectives10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111742 ↗
14. Management of biomass of selected grape leaves varieties in the process of methane fermentation10.24425/jwld.2022.142300 ↗
15. A Case Study on Converting Organic Farm Waste Vegetables to Biogas Using a Cartridge Design Anaerobic Digester10.1007/s12010-019-03034-w ↗
16. Waste biomass valorization for the production of biofuels and value-added products: A comprehensive review of thermochemical, biological and integrated processes10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.049 ↗
17. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste as a treatment prior to landfill10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.018 ↗
18. Kovács, E., Wirth, R., Maróti, G., Bagi, Z., Rákhely, G., and Kovács, K.L. (2013). Biogas Production from Protein-Rich Biomass: Fed-Batch Anaerobic Fermentation of Casein and of Pig Blood and Associated Changes in Microbial Community Composition. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0077265 ↗
19. Kofoed, M.V.W., Jensen, M.B., and Ottosen, L.D.M. (2021). Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading, Academic Press.
20. EurObserv’ER (2023, March 01). Measures the Progress Made by Renewable Energies European Union. Available online: https://www.eurobserv-er.org/.
21. Ervine, C. (2015). Core Statutes on Company Law, Macmillan Education.10.1007/978-1-137-54507-7 ↗
22. (2020, February 19). Hellenic Electricity Distribution Network Operator S.A. Available online: https://deddie.gr/en/.
23. Map of biogas plants
24. Ionel, I., and Cioablă, A.E. (2023, January 24). Biogas Production Based on Agricultural Residues. From History to Results and Perspectives. Available online: http://mec.upt.ro.
25. Kiran, E.U., Stamatelatou, K., Antonopoulou, G., and Lyberatos, G. (2016). Handbook of Biofuels Production: Processes and Technologies, Elsevier Inc.. [2nd ed.].
26. Szilágyi, Á., Bodor, A., Tolvai, N., Kovács, K.L., Bodai, L., Wirth, R., Bagi, Z., Szepesi, Á., Markó, V., and Kakuk, B. (2021). A comparative analysis of biogas production from tomato bio-waste in mesophilic batch and continuous anaerobic digestion systems. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0248654 ↗
27. Comparing the contents of dietary fibre fractions in some varieties of Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita pepo
28. The Effect of Thermal Processing of Cruciferous Vegetables on Their Content of Dietary Fiber and Its Fractions
29. A Review of the Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste10.1007/s12010-017-2472-x ↗
30. Implications of Biomass Use for Energy Production
31. Bioenergy from Permanent Grassland—A Review: 1. Biogas10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.070 ↗
32. Czubaszek, R., Wysocka-Czubaszek, A., and Tyborowski, R. (2022). Methane Production Potential from Apple Pomace, Cabbage Leaves, Pumpkin Residue and Walnut Husks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126128 ↗
33. Feiz, R., Metson, G.S., Wretman, J., and Ammenberg, J. (2023, January 24). Key Factors for Site-Selection of Biogas Plants in Sweden. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4023474.10.2139/ssrn.4023474 ↗
34. Anaerobic co-digestion of wasted vegetables and activated sludge10.1080/13102818.2009.10818551 ↗
35. Evaluation of the anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and tomato waste at mesophilic temperature10.1007/s12010-014-0790-9 ↗
36. Improving Carotenoid Extraction from Tomato Waste by Pulsed Electric Fields10.3389/fnut.2014.00012 ↗
37. Production of Biogas from Fruit and Vegetable Wastes Mixed with Different Wastes10.13189/eer.2015.030303 ↗
38. Manthia, F., Amalin, N., Matin, H.H.A., and Sumardiono, S. (2018). MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences.
39. Biomass storage for further energy use through biogas production10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.075 ↗
40. Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation10.1007/s10163-017-0622-4 ↗
41. Nugroho, A., and Sumantri, I. (2020). AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc.
42. Ulusoy, Y., Ulukardeler, A.H., Ünal, H., and Aliba, K. (2023, March 11). Analysis of Biogas Production in Turkey Utilising Three Different Materials and Two Scenarios. Available online: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR.
43. Reactor performance and energy analysis of solid state anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with corn stover and tomato residues10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.041 ↗
44. Integrated management of residues from tomato production: Recovery of value-added compounds and biogas production in the biorefinery context10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113505 ↗
45. The Possibility of Meeting Greenhouse Energy and CO2 Demands Through Utilisation of Cucumber and Tomato Residues10.1007/s12155-015-9705-z ↗
46. Two-stage anaerobic digestion of tomato, cucumber, common reed and grass silage in leach-bed reactors and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.052 ↗
47. Gioulounta, K., Kosmadakis, I., Elmasides, C., Diamantis, V., Piskilopoulos, A., Amiridis, I., and Stamatelatou, K. (2022). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing.
48. Food Waste and Byproducts: An Opportunity to Minimize Malnutrition and Hunger in Developing Countries10.3389/fsufs.2018.00052 ↗
49. Return of crop residues to arable land stimulates N2O emission but mitigates NO3− leaching: A meta-analysis10.1007/s13593-021-00715-x ↗
50. APHA (1999). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater the Nineteenth and Earlier Editions, APHA.
51. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., and Crocker, D.L.A.P. (2022, August 25). Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) Issue Date: 7/17/2005, Available online: www.nrel.gov.
52. Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests10.2166/wst.2016.336 ↗
53. Gomes, C.S., Strangfeld, M., and Meyer, M. (2021). Diauxie studies in biogas production from gelatin and adaptation of the modified gompertz model: Two-phase gompertz model. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031067 ↗
54. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 ↗
55. Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135) ↗
56. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations10.13031/2013.23153 ↗
57. Li, P., Li, W., Sun, M., Xu, X., Zhang, B., and Sun, Y. (2019). Evaluation of biochemical methane potential and kinetics on the anaerobic digestion of vegetable crop residues. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12010026 ↗
58. Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.006 ↗
59. Laboratory analyses for assessing the potential for biogas production of various agricultural residues in Greece
60. Minimization of diauxic growth lag-phase for high-efficiency biogas production10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.002 ↗
61. Biochemical methane potential from lignocellulosic wastes hydrothermally pretreated10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111555 ↗
62. Khan, M.T., Huelsemann, B., Krümpel, J., Wüst, D., Oechsner, H., and Lemmer, A. (2022). Biochemical Methane Potential of a Biorefinery’s Process-Wastewater and its Components at Different Concentrations and Temperatures. Fermentation, 8.10.3390/fermentation8100476 ↗
63. Antimicrobial activity of various parts of tomato plants varied with different solvent extracts10.5423/PPJ.OA.07.2018.0132 ↗
64. Antioxidant and Inhibitory Capacity of Tomato Leaf Ethanolic Extract against Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Candida albicans10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n3a349996 ↗