journal article·2022-08-01Open access

A SOA-Based Engineering Process Model for the Life Cycle Management of System-of-Systems in Industry 4.0

Gianvito Urgese, Paolo Azzoni, Jan van Deventer, Jerker Delsing, Alberto Macii, Enrico Macii

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

The evolution of industrial digitalisation has accelerated in recent years with the availability of hyperconnectivity, low-cost miniaturised electronic components, edge computing, and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies. More generally, with these key enablers, the concept of a system of systems (SoS) is becoming a reality in the industry domain. However, due to its complexity, the engineering process model adopted to design, develop, and manage IoT and SoS-based solutions for industry digitalisation is inadequate, inefficient, and frequently unable to manage the digitalisation solution’s entire life cycle. To address these limitations, we propose the Arrowhead Engineering Process (Arrowhead-EP) model and the Value Chain Engineering Process Map (VCEP-map), which explicitly reveal the interactions and dynamics of the engineering processes adopted by multistakeholder use cases in the industry domain. We decomposed and remodeled the engineering process to cover the complete life cycle of an industrial SoS, and we introduced a service-oriented solution intended to efficiently, flexibly, and effectively manage the three assets addressed by RAMI 4.0. The Arrowhead-EP model complemented by the VCEP-map fills the gaps identified in our literature-based analysis and satisfies the requirements of the life cycle management of a typical use case in the Industry 4.0 domain. In this regard, a specific example is used to illustrate the advantages of adopting the proposed engineering solution in a real multistakeholder use case.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Technology Assessment and Management · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, 10138 Torino, Italy

Eurotech S.p.A., 33020 Amaro, Italy

Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden

Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10138 Torino, Italy

Funding

European Commission

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: A systematic literature review10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085 ↗
2. Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration10.1002/bse.2940 ↗
3. Meindl, B., Ayala, N.F., Mendonça, J., and Frank, A.G. (2021). The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 168.10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120784 ↗
4. How transitioning to Industry 4.0 promotes circular product lifetimes10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.11.014 ↗
5. Jahani, N., Sepehri, A., Vandchali, H.R., and Tirkolaee, E.B. (2021). Application of industry 4.0 in the procurement processes of supply chains: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147520 ↗
6. Tirkolaee, E.B., Sadeghi, S., Mooseloo, F.M., Vandchali, H.R., and Aeini, S. (2021). Application of machine learning in supply chain management: A comprehensive overview of the main areas. Math. Probl. Eng., 2021.10.1155/2021/1476043 ↗
7. Kechagias, E.P., Chatzistelios, G., Papadopoulos, G.A., and Apostolou, P. (2022). Digital transformation of the maritime industry: A cybersecurity systemic approach. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., 37.10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100526 ↗
8. Kechagias, E.P., Miloulis, D.M., Chatzistelios, G., Gayialis, S.P., and Papadopoulos, G.A. (2021). Applying a System Dynamics Approach for the Pharmaceutical Industry: Simulation and Optimization of the Quality Control Process. arXiv.10.37394/232015.2021.17.91 ↗
9. Sixt, M., and Strube, J. (2017). Systematic and model-assisted evaluation of solvent based-or pressurized hot water extraction for the extraction of Artemisinin from Artemisia annua L. Processes, 5.10.3390/pr5040086 ↗
10. Modeling of particulate processes for the continuous manufacture of solid-based pharmaceutical dosage forms10.3390/pr1020067 ↗
11. Gayialis, S.P., Kechagias, E.P., and Konstantakopoulos, G.D. (2022). A city logistics system for freight transportation: Integrating information technology and operational research. Oper. Res., 1–30.10.1007/s12351-022-00695-0 ↗
12. Gayialis, S.P., Kechagias, E.P., Konstantakopoulos, G.D., and Papadopoulos, G.A. (2022). A Predictive Maintenance System for Reverse Supply Chain Operations. Logistics, 6.10.3390/logistics6010004 ↗
13. Barchi, F., Urgese, G., Macii, E., and Acquaviva, A. (2019, January 2–6). Code mapping in heterogeneous platforms using deep learning and llvm-ir. Proceedings of the 2019 56th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1145/3316781.3317789 ↗
14. Barchi, F., Parisi, E., Urgese, G., Ficarra, E., and Acquaviva, A. (2021). Exploration of convolutional neural network models for source code classification. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 97.10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104075 ↗
15. Pech, M., and Vrchota, J. (2022). The Product Customization Process in Relation to Industry 4.0 and Digitalization. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10030539 ↗
16. Adolphs, P., Bedenbender, H., Dirzus, D., Ehlich, M., Epple, U., Hankel, M., Heidel, R., Hoffmeister, M., Huhle, H., and Kärcher, B. (2015). Status Report: RAMI4.0, VDI/VDE-Gesellshact Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik. Technical Report.
17. Azzoni, P. (2020). From Internet of Things to System of Systems: Market analysis, achievements, positioning and future vision of the ECS community on IoT and SoS. ARTEMIS-IA Whitepaper, 81.
18. Towards software performance monitoring: An approach for the aerospace industry10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.068 ↗
19. Kulcsár, G., Varga, P., Tatara, M.S., Montori, F., Inigo, M.A., Urgese, G., and Azzoni, P. (2021, January 18–20). Modeling an Industrial Revolution: How to Manage Large-Scale, Complex IoT Ecosystems?. Proceedings of the 2021 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), Bordeaux, France.
20. (2019). Systems and Software Engineering—System of Systems (SoS) Considerations in Life Cycle Stages of a System (Standard No. ISO/IEC/IEEE 21839).
21. Europe, E. (2021). Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for Electronic Components and Systems, ECS Europe.
22. Hallmans, D., Sandström, K., Larsson, S., Ericsson, N., and Nolte, T. (2021, January 7–10). Design considerations introducing analytics as a “dual use” in complex industrial embedded systems. Proceedings of the 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vasteras, Sweden.10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613273 ↗
23. Architecting principles for systems-of-systems
24. Jamshidi, M. (2009, January 23–26). Control of system of systems. Proceedings of the 2009 7th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Cardiff, UK.10.1109/INDIN.2009.5195772 ↗
25. Kozma, D., Varga, P., and Larrinaga, F. (2021). System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A new concept based on process engineering methodologies. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083386 ↗
26. Tomaskova, H., and Tirkolaee, E.B. (2021). Using a process approach to pandemic planning: A case study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11094121 ↗
27. Margaria, T., and Schieweck, A. (2019, January 16–20). The digital thread in industry 4.0. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods, Lugano, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-030-34968-4_1 ↗
28. Engineering design with digital thread10.2514/1.J057255 ↗
29. (1994). Industrial Automation Systems and Integration Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles (Standard No. ISO 10303-1:1994).
30. (2013). Enterprise-Control System Integration—Part 2: Objects and Attributes for Enterprise-Control System Integration (Standard No. IEC 62264-2:2015).
31. (2018). Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Integration of Life-Cycle Data for Process Plants Including Oil and Gas Production Facilities (Standard No. ISO 15926-13:2018). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/70694.html.
32. OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies10.1016/j.cad.2012.01.008 ↗
33. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127 ↗
34. (2009). Industrial Systems, Installations and Equipment and Industrial Products—Structuring Principles and Reference Designations—Part 1: Basic Rules (Standard No. IEC 81346-1:2009).
35. The Reference Designation System (RDS) a common naming convention for systems and their elements10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00251.x ↗
36. Carlsson, O., Vera, D., Delsing, J., Ahmad, B., and Harrison, R. (2016, January 19–21). Plant descriptions for engineering tool interoperability. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Poitiers, France.10.1109/INDIN.2016.7819255 ↗
37. Collaborative product development: A literature overview10.1080/09537287.2010.543169 ↗
38. Optimizing Quality Inspection and Control in Powder Bed Metal Additive Manufacturing: Challenges and Research Directions10.1109/JPROC.2021.3054628 ↗
39. Preidel, C., Daum, S., and Borrmann, A. (2017). Data retrieval from building information models based on visual programming. Vis. Eng., 5.10.1186/s40327-017-0055-0 ↗
40. Smart manufacturing process and system automation—A critical review of the standards and envisioned scenarios10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.010 ↗
41. IoT-based configurable information service platform for product lifecycle management10.1109/TII.2014.2306391 ↗
42. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014 ↗
43. Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005 ↗
44. From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2011.07.002 ↗
45. Ontology for cloud manufacturing based product lifecycle management10.1007/s10845-017-1376-5 ↗
46. Big data in product lifecycle management10.1007/s00170-015-7151-x ↗
47. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015 ↗
48. Lu, Y., Morris, K.C., and Frechette, S. (2016). Current standards landscape for smart manufacturing systems. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. NISTIR, 8107.10.6028/NIST.IR.8107 ↗
49. Lin, S., Miller, B., Durand, J., Bleakley, G., Chigani, A., Martin, R., Murphy, B., and Crawford, M. (2017). The Industrial Internet of Things Volume G1: Reference Architecture, Industrial Internet Consortium.
50. Bonnaud, S., Didier, C., and Kohle, A. (2019). Industry 4.0 and Cognitive Manufacturing—Architecture Patterns, Use Cases and IBM Solutions, IBM.
51. Heidel, R. (2019). Industrie 4.0: The Reference Architecture Model RAMI 4.0 and the Industrie 4.0 Component, Beuth Verlag GmbH.
52. Reference architectures for smart manufacturing: A critical review10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.006 ↗
53. Delsing, J. (2017). Iot Automation: Arrowhead Framework, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315367897 ↗
54. (2022, May 20). Eclipse Arrowhead Framework. Available online: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/iot.arrowhead.
55. Urgese, G., Azzoni, P., van Deventer, J., Delsing, J., and Macii, E. (2020, January 20–24). An Engineering Process model for managing a digitalised life-cycle of products in the Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the IEEE NOMS Workshop on Management for Industry 4.0, Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/NOMS47738.2020.9110365 ↗
56. Scholten, B. (2007). The Road to Integration: A Guide to Applying the ISA-95 Standard in Manufacturing, ISA.
57. Kozma, D., Varga, P., and Soós, G. (2019, January 22–25). Supporting Digital Production, Product Lifecycle and Supply Chain Management in Industry 4.0 by the Arrowhead Framework—A Survey. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Helsinki, Finland.10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972216 ↗
58. Making system of systems interoperable—The core components of the arrowhead framework10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.028 ↗
59. Kozma, D., Varga, P., and Larrinaga, F. (2019, January 10–13). Data-driven Workflow Management by utilising BPMN and CPN in IIoT Systems with the Arrowhead Framework. Proceedings of the 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain.10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869501 ↗
60. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing10.1109/TDSC.2004.2 ↗
61. Lindström, J., Hermanson, A., Blomstedt, F., and Kyösti, P. (2018). A multi-usable cloud service platform: A case study on improved development pace and efficiency. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8020316 ↗
62. Ontological approach for products-centric information system interoperability in networked manufacturing enterprises10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.05.003 ↗
63. ISO 15926 “Life cycle data for process plant”: An overview10.2516/ogst:2005045 ↗
64. Borangiu, T., Thomas, A., and Trentesaux, D. (2013). Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35852-4 ↗