journal article·2022-07-31Open access

Influence of Perforated Soils on Installation of New Piles

Supakij Nontananandh, Shuichi Kuwahara, Ken-ichi Shishido, Shinya Inazumi

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing demand to replace ancient structures. The removal of such structures also involves the removal of the existing piles that supported the structures, and the backfilling of the pulling-out holes that formed during the removal. However, there are no standard guidelines for the backfilling of pulling-out holes. At present, therefore, each owner or contractor must determine the material and the construction method to use for backfilling. This results in a difference between the mechanical properties of the original soil and those of the soil that has been backfilled, namely, the soil on which a newly built structure will be constructed. In this study, it was assumed that a new pile would be installed on a perforated soil (that is, the soil left after removing the existing piles) where the mechanical properties differ between the original soil and the backfilled soil. The behavior of the new pile, when installed on the boundary of a soil between two types of mechanical properties, was evaluated by a three-dimensional linear elastic analysis. When the new pile was installed at the boundary between the two types of soil with different mechanical properties, most of the new pile was inclined to the soil side where the N value was relatively small. However, the inclination of the new pile was able to be suppressed by increasing the distance from the boundary between the two types of soil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan Rd. Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

Japan Association for Pulling-Out Existing Piles, 2-20-11 Takaban, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-0004, Japan

Tomec Corporation, 1-6-3 Shibadaimon, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0012, Japan

College of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Influence of pulling out existing piles on the surrounding ground
2. Settlement of surrounding grounds due to existence of pile pulling-out holes
3. Influence of the condition of pullout holes on the surrounding ground10.1186/s40703-020-00117-0 ↗
4. Inazumi, S., Kuwahara, S., Nontananandh, S., Jotisankasa, A., and Chaiprakaikeow, S. (2022). Numerical analysis for ground subsidence caused by extraction holes of removed piles. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115481 ↗
5. Improvement mechanism of sodium carbonate on traditional composite filler10.1680/jgrim.19.00014 ↗
6. Effect of insertion of casing by rotation on existing piles in removal of existing pile10.1680/jgere.20.00042 ↗
7. Inazumi, S., Hashimoto, R., Shinsaka, T., Nontananandh, S., and Chaiprakaikeow, S. (2021). Applicability of additives for ground improvement utilizing fine powder of waste glass. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14185169 ↗
8. Construction method for pulling out existing piles and influence of pulling-out holes on the surrounding ground10.1007/s10706-020-01418-y ↗
9. MPS-CAE simulation on dynamic interaction between steel casing and existing pile when pulling out existing piles
10. Evaluation of flow-ability on fluidization treated soils based on flow analysis by MPS method
11. Fluidity evaluation of fluidisation treated soils based on the moving particle semi-implicit method10.1080/19386362.2016.1277618 ↗
12. 3-D particle flow analysis for fluidization treated soils
13. Nakao, K., Inazumi, S., Takaue, T., Tanaka, S., and Shinoi, T. (2021). Evaluation of discharging surplus soils for relative stirred deep mixing methods by MPS-CAE analysis. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14010058 ↗
14. Nakao, K., Inazumi, S., Takahashi, T., and Nontananandh, S. (2022). Numerical simulation of the liquefaction phenomenon by MPSM-DEM coupled CAES. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14127517 ↗
15. Lees, A. (2016). Geotechnical Finite Element Analysis: A Practical Guide, ICE Publishing.10.1680/gfea.60876 ↗
16. Analysis of piled raft foundation using MIDAS GTS NX
17. Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, parti-cle size, ageing and overconsolidation10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425 ↗
18. Applicability of the SPT-based methods for estimating toe bearing capacity of driven PHC piles in the thick deltaic deposits10.1007/s12205-011-0801-0 ↗
19. Behavior of bearing capacity on pile foundation during fluctuating groundwater level
20. Standard penetration test based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314) ↗
21. Empirical estimations of soil constants using standard penetration test N value
22. Huang, S., Wang, J., Qiu, Z., and Kang, K. (2018). Effects of cyclic wetting-drying conditions on elastic modulus and compressive strength of sandstone and mudstone. Processes, 6.10.3390/pr6120234 ↗
23. Nakao, K., Yamaguchi, H., Hoshino, S., and Inazumi, S. (2022). Applicability of weighting method as measure for existing manholes against uplifting during liquefaction. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083818 ↗
24. Shear modulus and shear strength of cohesive soils10.3208/sandf1972.14.3_1 ↗
25. Predicting standard penetration test N-value from cone penetration test data using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.gsf.2016.02.003 ↗