journal article·2022-07-20Open access

Assessment of Diagnostic Radiology Facilities Technical Radiation Protection Requirements in KSA

Jaber Alyami, M. H. Nassef

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

The national regulatory body in the state regulates the source of ionizing radiation such as diagnostic radiology to minimize exposure to the operators and the patients. The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (KSA-SFDA) cover all medical regulatory aspects of ionizing radiation such as diagnostic X-ray facilities for all practices and intervention requirements. The study presents an assessment and analysis of the level of technical radiation protection requirements and the status of applying the national regulatory standards for different diagnostic facilities in KSA. Based on the online scientific recent database published in the field of radiation protection regulations and dose assessment for diagnostic radiology in KSA, and from the data published by the KSA-SFDA report in 2015. About 109 diagnostic X-ray facilities were selected from 35 governorates distributed in the kingdom. More than 95% of the examined facilities were in good condition concerning the national radiological protection technical regulation. About 11.9% of the facilities had a radiation leakage or cracks in the wall of the X-ray room/entrance door of the room. 16.5% of the facilities did not have a radiation warning sign written in Arabic/English languages. About 21.9% of the operators did not use any personal radiation dosimeter such as TLD or OSL. More than 40.7% of those facilities do not keep a record of the personal dosimeter reading at their facilities. Only 11.1% of the examined facilities do not have any personal protective tools such as a lead apron or thyroid shield. About 38.2% of the examined facilities do not carry out the annual periodic maintenance for the used X-ray machines at those facilities. From the obtained results, it was concluded that the majority of the radiation protection, radiation safety requirements and physical security measures undertaken in these facilities were in good implementation of the national and international technical regulations. The study suggests a need to apply for a quality control test procedures program regularly at those facilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Dose and Imaging · Radiology practices and education · Radioactivity and Radon Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Smart Medical Imaging Research Group, King Abdul-Aziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Animal House Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdul-Aziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Faculty of Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Department, King Abdul-Aziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 7551, Cairo 11762, Egypt

Funding

Institutional Fund Projects

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Performance of medical radiographic X-ray systems in Greece for the time period 1998–200410.1016/j.ejmp.2007.10.001 ↗
2. Assessment of entrance skin doses for patients undergoing diagnostic X-ray examinations in King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, KSA
3. International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) (2021, May 10). Inspection of Radiation Sources and Regulatory Enforcement, IAEA-TECDOC-1526 2007, Supplement to IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-1.5. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/publications/7627/inspection-of-radiation-sources-and-regulatory-enforcement.
4. Radiation protection of patients in diagnostic and interventional radiology in Asian countries. Impact of an IAEA project10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.019 ↗
5. United Nation Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2008). Sources Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, United Nation Publications. Available online: https://www.unscear.org/unscear/uploads/documents/unscear-reports/UNSCEAR_2008_Report_Vol.I-CORR.pdf.
6. Roles and responsibilities of medical physicists in radiation protection10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.035 ↗
7. International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) (2011). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources, Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf.
8. Radiation protection in medical imaging10.1016/j.radi.2005.04.008 ↗
9. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1982). Protection against Ionizing Radiation from External Sources Used in Medicine, Pergamum Press. ICRP Publication 33. Ann. ICRP 9 (1).
10. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1990). Radiological Protection of the Worker in Medicine and Dentistry, Available online: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2057.
11. Sutton, D.G., and Williams, J.R. (2001). Radiation shielding for diagnostic X-rays 2001, Report of a joint BIR/IPEM Working party. Radiology, 219.10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma47466 ↗
12. Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) (2022, June 16). Requirements on Radiation Protection and Safety for Healthcare Providers, Available online: https://beta.sfda.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2021-03/RequirementRadiationProtectionSafetyE.pdf.
13. Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (2009). The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities Where Ionizing Radiation Is Used, Available online: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/41/081/41081618.pdf.
14. Interagency Working Group on Medical Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington (2022, June 16). Radiation Protection Guidance for Diagnostic and Interventional X-ray Procedures 2014, Federal Guidance Report No.14, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/radiation/federal-guidance-report-no-14-radiation-protection-guidance-diagnostic-and-interventional.
15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2021, June 10). Radiation Shielding Design Assessment and Verification Requirements 2015, Available online: www.epa.nsw.gov.au.
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2022, June 16). Protocols: Compliance Testing of Dental X-ray Apparatus Used for Plain Radiography, Available online: https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/4771314_protocols_dental_xray.pdf.
17. Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) (2019). Requirements for Radiological Health, Safe Practice in Health Facilities, Saudi Food and Drug Authority.
18. (2022, June 16). Radiation Health Series No.1 Guidance Notes on Radiation Protection for Diagnostic Radiology, Available online: https://www.rhd.gov.hk/en/pdf/Pub1_english.pdf.
19. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2006). Applying Radiation Safety Standards in Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Procedures Using X-rays, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
20. A compliance testing program for diagnostic X-ray equipment10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00027-X ↗
21. (2007). Standard No. ISO Standard Number 21482. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/40264.html.
22. (2021, June 10). Available online: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/new-symbol-launched-warn-public-about-radiation-dangers.
23. Radiation Protection and Regulations for the Nuclear Medicine Physician10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.005 ↗
24. Radiation protection and dosimetry issues in the medical applications of ionizing radiation10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.02.007 ↗
25. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2006). Safety Reports Series No. 47. Radiation Protection in the Design of Radiotherapy Facilities, IAEA.
26. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP, 37, 1–332.
27. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2014). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA.
28. (2021, June 10). Available online: https://www.sfda.gov.sa/ar/news/79176.
29. Al-Haj, A.N., Lagarde, C.S., and Lobriguito, A.M. (2004, January 23–28). Variation of Occupational Doses among Subspecialties in Diagnostic Radiology. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Madrid, Spain.
30. A Cross-sectional Study Based on the Assessment of the Radiation dose for Medical Radiation Workers10.4103/KKUJHS.KKUJHS_25_21 ↗
31. Five Years Reviof Occupational Dosimetry Program at A Tertiary Care Hospital and Comparison with UNSCEAR 2008 Report10.17554/j.issn.2313-3406.2018.05.51 ↗
32. Occupational Radiation Dose for Medical Workers at a University Hospital10.1016/j.jtusci.2017.01.003 ↗
33. An assessment of occupational effective dose in several medical departments in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101402 ↗
34. CT examination effective doses in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.07.011 ↗
35. Occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology workers10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101249 ↗