journal article·2022-07

Lateritic soil geopolymer composites for ceramics and engineering construction applications

Marilene G. Sá Ribeiro, Mauro R. Sardela, Patrick F. Keane, Juan S. Lopez, Waltraud M. Kriven, Ruy A. Sá Ribeiro

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Characterization of an Amazonian, laterite‐doped, kaolinitic soil (LK) or “lateritic soil” and laterite‐doped metakaolin (LMK) calcined at two distinct rates, as well as granite‐marble (GM) particulate industrial wastes was performed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry, and particle size and distribution analysis. In addition, an LMK geopolymer (GP) and a lateritic metakaolin‐based GP reinforced with granite‐marble composite (LMKGP‐GM) were tested for water resistance and for mechanical strength. XRD and XRF were used to investigate the composition of the composite materials, while XRD confirmed the formation of GP. Just as in the case of highly reactive commercial metakaolin used in construction, according to this study, lateritic soil‐based metakaolin presented similar characteristics. Therefore, it could be used in the development of more sustainable ceramics and construction materials, including the use of GM waste as a reinforcing phase/aggregate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Green Building and Engineering Laboratory National Institute for Amazonian Research Manaus Amazonas Brazil

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

Biodiversity and Biotechnology Bionorte Network Manaus Amazonas Brazil

Materials Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Sol 90 · 2013
2. 10.1346/CCMN.2007.055030310.1346/CCMN.2007.0550303 ↗
3. 10.3390/su301029310.3390/su3010293 ↗
4. Geopolymers: ceramic‐like inorganic polymers
5. Davidovits J · 2015
6. 10.3390/su609553510.3390/su6095535 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.20510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.205 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12226810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122268 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12144310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121443 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02922.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02922.x ↗
12. Reviews on clay geopolymer ceramic using powder metallurgy method
13. 10.15446/dyna.v82n194.4635210.15446/dyna.v82n194.46352 ↗
14. A review of particle‐ and fiber‐reinforced metakaolin‐based geopolymer composites
15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09995-110.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09995-1 ↗
16. 10.1039/b808157c10.1039/b808157c ↗
17. Properties of granite particulate‐reinforced, potassium geopolymer
18. Munsell Color · 1994
19. ASTM C78/C78M‐18 · 2019
20. 10.1021/jp911108d10.1021/jp911108d ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.01410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.037 ↗
23. 10.1111/jace.1454210.1111/jace.14542 ↗
24. RA Sá Ribeiro · 123
25. Sá Ribeiro RA · 135
26. 10.1155/2019/895076410.1155/2019/8950764 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12419410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124194 ↗