Lateritic soil geopolymer composites for ceramics and engineering construction applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Characterization of an Amazonian, laterite‐doped, kaolinitic soil (LK) or “lateritic soil” and laterite‐doped metakaolin (LMK) calcined at two distinct rates, as well as granite‐marble (GM) particulate industrial wastes was performed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry, and particle size and distribution analysis. In addition, an LMK geopolymer (GP) and a lateritic metakaolin‐based GP reinforced with granite‐marble composite (LMKGP‐GM) were tested for water resistance and for mechanical strength. XRD and XRF were used to investigate the composition of the composite materials, while XRD confirmed the formation of GP. Just as in the case of highly reactive commercial metakaolin used in construction, according to this study, lateritic soil‐based metakaolin presented similar characteristics. Therefore, it could be used in the development of more sustainable ceramics and construction materials, including the use of GM waste as a reinforcing phase/aggregate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Green Building and Engineering Laboratory National Institute for Amazonian Research Manaus Amazonas Brazil
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
Biodiversity and Biotechnology Bionorte Network Manaus Amazonas Brazil
Materials Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Sol 90 · 2013
2. 10.1346/CCMN.2007.055030310.1346/CCMN.2007.0550303 ↗
3. 10.3390/su301029310.3390/su3010293 ↗
4. Geopolymers: ceramic‐like inorganic polymers
5. Davidovits J · 2015
6. 10.3390/su609553510.3390/su6095535 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.20510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.205 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12226810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122268 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12144310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121443 ↗
10. Kriven WM10.1002/9781118406892.ch15 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02922.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02922.x ↗
12. Reviews on clay geopolymer ceramic using powder metallurgy method
13. 10.15446/dyna.v82n194.4635210.15446/dyna.v82n194.46352 ↗
14. A review of particle‐ and fiber‐reinforced metakaolin‐based geopolymer composites
15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09995-110.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09995-1 ↗
16. 10.1039/b808157c10.1039/b808157c ↗
17. Properties of granite particulate‐reinforced, potassium geopolymer
18. Munsell Color · 1994
19. ASTM C78/C78M‐18 · 2019
20. 10.1021/jp911108d10.1021/jp911108d ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.01410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.037 ↗
23. 10.1111/jace.1454210.1111/jace.14542 ↗
24. RA Sá Ribeiro · 123
25. Sá Ribeiro RA · 135
26. 10.1155/2019/895076410.1155/2019/8950764 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12419410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124194 ↗