An Evidence-Based Survey on Full-Scale Membrane Biological Reactors: Main Technical Features and Operational Aspects
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a survey on full-scale membrane biological reactors (MBRs) wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Italy. Alongside the main technical characteristics of the Italian MBR plants, the opinions of the plant managers on the operational advantages and disadvantages are described. As reported by the MBR technology suppliers, approximately 290 MBR municipal or industrial WWTPs are in operation in Italy, out of which 242 were studied in this survey. Data from more than one hundred municipal WWTPs were collected; these account for a total capacity of about 2,000,000 population equivalent (PE), which corresponds to 3% of the total organic load treated by the Italian WWTPs with secondary and advanced treatment. Usually, small installations adopt the flat-sheet rather than hollow-fiber membrane configuration. The main reasons why the MBR technology has been preferred to other options are its potential to be used for increasing the treatment capacity of existing plants and its compactness. Moreover, the followed operational advantages have been highlighted: easiness to comply with the discharge limits, removal of pathogens without specific disinfection units, possibility of internal reuse of the effluent, and process automation. Membrane fouling and plant shutdown have been recorded as the most relevant troubles, the last one indeed occurring only occasionally or rarely.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044 ↗
2. Judd, S., and Judd, C. (2011). The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
3. Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: A review10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.060 ↗
4. Membrane bioreactors—A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010 ↗
5. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.006 ↗
6. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): Cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.001 ↗
7. A comparison between two full-scale MBR and CAS municipal wastewater treatment plants: Techno-economic-environmental assessment10.1007/s11356-017-9409-3 ↗
8. Current Status and Future Prospects of Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) and Fouling Phenomena: A Systematic Review10.1002/cjce.23345 ↗
9. Iorhemen, O.T., Hamza, R.A., and Tay, J.H. (2016). Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation: Membrane Fouling. Membranes, 6.10.3390/membranes6020033 ↗
10. Musa, M.A., Idrus, S., Che Man, H., and Nik Daud, N.N. (2018). Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Recovery Using Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs): Strategies and Achievements. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11071675 ↗
11. Integrating novel (thermophilic aerobic membrane reactor-TAMR) and conventional (conventional activated sludge-CAS) biological processes for the treatment of high strength aqueous wastes10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.112 ↗
12. Treatment of aqueous wastes by means of Thermophilic Aerobic Membrane Reactor (TAMR) and nanofiltration (NF): Process auditing of a full-scale plant10.1007/s10661-019-7827-z ↗
13. Minimization of municipal sewage sludge by means of a thermophilic membrane bioreactor with intermittent aeration10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.101 ↗
14. The upgrading of conventional activated sludge processes with thermophilic aerobic membrane reactor: Alternative solutions for sludge reduction10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110490 ↗
15. Hai, F.I., Yamamoto, K., and Lee, C.-H. (2019). Membrane Biological Reactors: Theory, Modeling, Design, Management and Applications to Wastewater Reuse, IWA Publishing. [2nd ed.].10.2166/9781780409177 ↗
16. Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.061 ↗
17. (2022, April 22). The Mbr Membrane Bioreactor Site. Available online: https://www.thembrsite.com/largest-mbr-plants/largest-membrane-bioreactor-plants-worldwide/.
18. Assessing the feasibility of two hybrid MBR systems using PAC for removing macro and micropollutants10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.023 ↗
19. From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid processes, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal: A review10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.005 ↗
20. Biodegradation of emerging organic micropollutants in nonconventional biological wastewater treatment: A critical review10.1089/ees.2017.0287 ↗
21. Consolidated vs new advanced treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern from urban wastewater10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.265 ↗
22. A comprehensive integrated membrane bioreactor model for greenhouse gas emissions10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.061 ↗
23. How green are environmental technologies? A new approach for a global evaluation: The case of WWTP effluents ozonation10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.015 ↗
24. Ranking wastewater treatment trains based on their impacts and benefits on human health: A “Biological Assay and Disease” approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.021 ↗
25. (2022, April 22). ISTAT Water Statistics—Years 2018–2020. (In Italian).
26. Membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: A review10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100109 ↗
27. Flat Sheet or hollow fibre—Comparison of full-scale membrane bio-reactor configurations10.5004/dwt.2012.2465 ↗
28. Akhondi, E., Zamani, F., Tng, K.H., Leslie, G., Krantz, W.B., Fane, A.G., and Chew, J.W. (2017). The Performance and Fouling Control of Submerged Hollow Fiber (HF) Systems: A Review. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7080765 ↗
29. Ezugbe, E.O., and Rathilal, S. (2020). Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Membranes, 10.10.3390/membranes10050089 ↗
30. Yoon, S.-H. (2015). Membrane Bioreactor Processes: Principles and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/b18631 ↗
31. Membrane Biological Reactors (MBR) and Their Applications for Water Reuse
32. Reuse of treated municipal wastewater for irrigation in Apulia Region: The “IN.TE.R.R.A.” project10.30638/eemj.2015.177 ↗
33. Membrane bioreactor for water reuse10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.002 ↗
34. Removal of endocrine disruptors using a membrane bioreactor and disinfection10.1139/s06-049 ↗
35. Effect of biological and chemical oxidation on the removal of estrogenic compounds (NP and BPA) from wastewater: An integrated assessment procedure10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.026 ↗
36. Helmi, A., and Gallucci, F. (2020). Latest Developments in Membrane (Bio)Reactors. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8101239 ↗
37. Identify driving forces of MBR applications in China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.412 ↗
38. Automatic control systems for submerged membrane bioreactors: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.055 ↗
39. Assessment of energy-saving strategies and operational costs in full-scale membrane bioreactors10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.023 ↗
40. Different fouling modes of submerged hollow-fiber and flat-sheet membranes induced by high strength wastewater with concurrent biofouling10.1016/j.desal.2004.12.030 ↗
41. Park, H.-D., Chang, I.-S., and Lee, K.-J. (2015). Principles of Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment, CRC Press.10.1201/b18368 ↗
42. Fouling Issues in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) for Wastewater Treatment: Major Mechanisms, Prevention and Control Strategies10.3390/pr2040795 ↗
43. Hollow fiber membrane life in membrane bioreactors (MBR)10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.026 ↗
44. Full-scale membrane bioreactor process WWTPs in East Taihu basin: Wastewater characteristics, energy consumption and sustainability10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137983 ↗