Novel processing, testing and characterization of copper/carbon nanotube (Cu/CNT) yarn composite conductor
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Sustainable electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) is likely to lead to an increase in the electrical wiring contained within a single aircraft. Since the electrical resistance and mass of copper (Cu) conductors are associated with power losses, it is desirable to design high‐conductivity lightweight conductor materials, thus reducing the mass of components like motor windings, low‐voltage signal cables, and transmission cables for data and power to improve the overall energy efficiency. This paper describes a unique framework for manufacturing metalized carbon nanotube (CNT) composite conductors, measuring their electrical conductivity and strength, and modeling the overall conductivity and current sharing within such composites. Tensile testing was conducted on the processed composite conductor cables with the use of acoustic emission and electrical resistivity to determine stress‐dependent‐failure mechanisms while monitoring the electrical conductivity. The average of measured electrical conductivities of annealed Cu/CNT samples from batch 5 was greater than theoretical predictions by 9.8 percent and was also greater than the conductivity of pure annealed Cu by 4.8 percent and had comparable ultimate tensile strengths. Additionally, those Cu/CNT samples provide a 13.5% weight saving over current state of the art copper wires. Theories explaining improved intrinsic conductivity are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland OH USA
Materials Science and Engineering Department The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
Mechanical Engineering Department Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS USA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland Ohio USA
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP). (2020).https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/aeronautics/eap/Accessed June 22 2020
2. deGrohIII HenryC. Consideration of Conductive Motor Winding Materials at Room and Elevated Temperatures. NASA/TM—2015‐218882 (2015).https://ntrs.nasa.gov
3. Pops H · 1997
4. 10.1098/rsos.18081410.1098/rsos.180814 ↗
5. ASTM B258–18 · 2018
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.20810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.208 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.04410.1016/j.msea.2016.08.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.05510.1016/j.msea.2017.04.055 ↗
9. 10.31399/asm.hb.v02.a000111710.31399/asm.hb.v02.a0001117 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20100049310.1002/smll.201000493 ↗
11. Electrical performance of lightweight CNT‐Cu composite wires impacted by surface and internal cu spatial distribution
12. 10.1039/C9NR90011J10.1039/C9NR90011J ↗
13. deGrohIII HenryC. Highly Conductive Wire: Cu Carbon Nanotube Composite Ampacity and Metallic CNT Buckypaper Conductivity. NASA/TM—2017‐219480 (2017).https://ntrs.nasa.gov
14. AlmansourA; LizcanoM GoretskiA.Lightweight and durable cable design of copper‐carbon nanotube composite conductor cables.Presented at the S&T Electrical Systems and Wiring Inter‐Agency Meeting Cleveland OH;2019.
15. 10.1155/2013/29651710.1155/2013/296517 ↗
16. CollinsPG.Defects and disorder in carbon nanotubes.Oxford handbook of nanoscience and technology: frontiers and advances.Y. Y.Fu eds. Oxford University Press Oxford England;2009.
17. 10.1007/s11051-008-9376-110.1007/s11051-008-9376-1 ↗
18. 10.1116/1.170558710.1116/1.1705587 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8NR07521B10.1039/C8NR07521B ↗
20. 10.1149/1.327420210.1149/1.3274202 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl072005110.1021/nl0720051 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmst.2014.04.01610.1016/j.jmst.2014.04.016 ↗
24. Effect of twist and porosity on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanofiber yarns
25. 10.1149/1.339065610.1149/1.3390656 ↗
26. The influence of surface roughness on electrical conductance of thin cu films: An ab initio study
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.027 ↗
28. Thermal conductivity of multi‐walled carbon nanotube sheets: Radiation losses and quenching of phonon modes
29. One hundred‐fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube‐copper composite
30. AlmansourA.Use of single tow ceramic matrix minicomposites to determine fundamental room and elevated temperature properties.Ph.D. Thesis Univ. of Akron;2017.
31. Challenges and limitations in the identification of acoustic emission signature of damage mechanisms in composites materials
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003 ↗
33. GorvenA; AlmansourA KiserJ.Using acoustic emission energy and frequency analysis to characterize damage in SiC/SiC minicomposites.Presented at the 43rd International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites (ICACC) Daytona Beach FL;2019.
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.00810.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.008 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.01510.1016/j.msea.2006.02.015 ↗
36. Electromechanical properties of metallic, quasimetallic, and semiconducting carbon nanotubes under stretching
37. Carbon nanotubes as piezoresistive microelectromechanical sensors: Theory and experiment
38. Piezoelectric response of multi‐walled carbon nanotubes
39. 10.1149/2.054302jes10.1149/2.054302jes ↗
40. 10.1039/B510858F10.1039/B510858F ↗
41. AbelPB. Ohmic Heating of Composite Candidate Graphite‐Fiber/Coating Combinations. NASA TM–4491.1993.https://ntrs.nasa.gov
42. 10.1557/JMR.1994.061710.1557/JMR.1994.0617 ↗
43. 10.1016/0025‐5416(85)90078‐310.1016/0025‐5416(85)90078‐3 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20110102210.1002/anie.201101022 ↗