journal article·2022-04-12Open access

A New Hybrid Optimization Method, Application to a Single Objective Active Flow Control Test Case

Martí Coma, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jordi Pons-Prats, Gabriel Bugeda, Josep M. Bergada

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 8

Abstract

Genetic Algorithms (GA) are useful optimization methods for exploration of the search space, but they usually have slowness problems to exploit and converge to the minimum. On the other hand, gradient based methods converge faster to local minimums, although are not so robust (e.g., flat areas and discontinuities can cause problems) and they lack exploration capabilities. This article presents a hybrid optimization method trying to combine the virtues of genetic and gradient based algorithms, and to overcome their corresponding drawbacks. The performance of the Hybrid Method is compared against a gradient based method and a Genetic Algorithm, both used alone. The rate of convergence of the methods is used to compare their performance. To take into account the robustness of the methods, each one has been executed more than once, with different starting points for the gradient based method and different random seeds for the Genetic Algorithm and the Hybrid Method. The performance of the different methods is tested against an optimization Active Flow Control (AFC) problem over a 2D Selig–Donovan 7003 (SD7003) airfoil at Reynolds number 6×104 and a 14 degree angle of attack. Five design variables are considered: jet position, jet width, momentum coefficient, forcing frequency and jet inclination angle. The objective function is defined as minus the lift coefficient (−Cl), so it is defined as a minimization problem. The proposed Hybrid Method enables working with N optimization algorithms, multiple objective functions and design variables per optimization algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics a l’Enginyeria (CIMNE), Edifici C1, Gran Capitan, 08034 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Physics, Aeronautics Division, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech (UPC), Edifici GAIA, Rambla de Sant Nebridi, 22, 08222 Terrassa, Spain

Department of Fluids Mechanics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech (UPC), Edifici TR4, C/Colom, 9, 08222 Terrassa, Spain

Department of Physics, Aeronautics Division, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech (UPC), Edifici C3, Esteve Terrades, 5, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech (UPC), Edifici C1, Gran Capitan, 08034 Barcelona, Spain

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Lalbakhsh, A., Afzal, M.U., Esselle, K.P., and Smith, S. (2017, January 11–15). Design of an artificial magnetic conductor surface using an evolutionary algorithm. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Verona, Italy.10.1109/ICEAA.2017.8065394 ↗
2. Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization to Design a Time-Delay Equalizer Metasurface for an Electromagnetic Band-Gap Resonator Antenna10.1109/LAWP.2016.2614498 ↗
3. Asadnia, M., Razmjou, A., and Beheshti, A. (2022). Chapter 2—Advancements and artificial intelligence approaches in antennas for environmental sensing. Artificial Intelligence and Data Science in Environmental Sensing, Academic Press. Cognitive Data Science in Sustainable Computing.
4. Darkening Low-Earth Orbit Satellite Constellations: A Review10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3155193 ↗
5. Enhancing the performance of a dual-energy gamma ray based three-phase flow meter with the help of grey wolf optimization algorithm10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.10.015 ↗
6. A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Classification
7. Jih, W.R., and Hsu, J.Y.J. (1999, January 10–15). Dynamic vehicle routing using hybrid Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 99CH36288C), Detroit, MI, USA.
8. Hybrid Genetic Algorithms: A Review
9. Utilizing Gradient Analysis within Interactive Genetic Algorithms10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.2.359 ↗
10. Hybrid-Game Strategies for multi-objective design optimization in engineering10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.03.007 ↗
11. Lee, D., Periaux, J., Pons-Prats, J., Bugeda, G., and Oñate, E. (2010, January 18–23). Double Shock Control Bump design optimization using hybridised evolutionary algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/CEC.2010.5586379 ↗
12. Efficient Hybrid-Game Strategies Coupled to Evolutionary Algorithms for Robust Multidisciplinary Design Optimization in Aerospace Engineering10.1109/TEVC.2010.2043364 ↗
13. Multilayered composite structure design optimisation using distributed/parallel multi-objective evolutionary algorithms10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.009 ↗
14. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
15. Shewchuk, J.R. (1994). An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method without the Agonizing Pain, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical report.
16. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space
17. Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons.
18. Fletcher, R. (2013). Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley & Sons.
19. Brent, R.P. (1973). Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives, Prentice-Hall.
20. Active Flow Control optimisation on SD7003 airfoil at pre and post-stall angles of attack using Synthetic Jets10.1016/j.apm.2021.05.016 ↗