A Comparison between Non-Localized Post-Activation Performance Enhancements Following Resistance Exercise for the Upper and the Lower Body
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the present investigation was to compare the acute non-localized post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of an exercise protocol involving either the upper or the lower body muscles. Twenty-four resistance trained men participated in the present study and were randomly assigned to an upper body (UB) or to a lower body (LB) group. Both groups tested for upper and lower body power (bench press throw (BPT) and countermovement jump power (CMJP) tests). Participants in the UB group were tested pre and post a high-intensity (HI) and a high-power (POW) bench press protocol while participants in the LB group performed a HI squat and a jump session (POW). A significant group × time interaction was found for CMJP in HI (p = 0.012). Post hoc tests revealed that CMJP was elevated in UB group only (+1.6%; p = 0.025). No other significant interactions were detected. Results of this study indicate that a non-localized PAPE on the lower body may be induced by a HI bench press protocol while a HI squat protocol may not increase upper body power. In particular, the squat protocol performed in the present study (5 sets of 1 rep) may be too demanding to produce a non-localized PAPE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy
Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy
Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research on Health Sciences & Technologies, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy
Department for Live Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: Historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues10.3389/fphys.2019.01359 ↗
2. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1007/s40279-015-0415-7 ↗
3. The acute effects of prior dynamic resistance exercise using different loads on subsequent upper-body explosive performance in resistance-trained men
4. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828d4465 ↗
5. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities10.2165/00007256-200939020-00004 ↗
6. Motor unit10.1002/cphy.c100087 ↗
7. Effect of lower-body resistance training on upper-body strength adaptation in trained men10.1519/JSC.0000000000001639 ↗
8. Postactivation performance enhancement: Does conditioning one arm augment performance in the other?10.1111/cpf.12659 ↗
9. The interaction of fatigue and potentiation following an acute bout of unilateral squats
10. The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): A pilot study
11. Complex training: The effect of exercise selection and training status on postactivation potentiation in rugby league players10.1519/JSC.0000000000001722 ↗
12. Complex training in professional rugby players: Influence of recovery time on upper-body power output10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f269 ↗
13. Brink, N.J., Constantinou, D., and Torres, G. (2021). Postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) of sprint acceleration performance. Eur. J. Sport Sci., 1–7.10.1080/17461391.2021.1955012 ↗
14. The acute effect of drop jump protocols with different volumes and recovery time on countermovement jump performance10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182518407 ↗
15. The effects of rest intervals on jumping performance: A meta-analysis on post-activation potentiation studies10.1080/02640414.2012.738924 ↗
16. A comparison between total body and split routine resistance training programs in trained men10.1519/JSC.0000000000003573 ↗
17. Hoffman, J.R. (2013). Physiological Aspects of Sport Training and Performance, Human Kinetics. [2nd ed.].
18. Comparison between bench press throw and ballistic push-up tests to assess upper-body power in trained individuals10.1519/JSC.0000000000002571 ↗
19. Cross-validation of three jump power equations10.1097/00005768-199904000-00013 ↗
20. Stevens, J.P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Science, Taylor and Francis. [5th ed.].
21. Effects of set configuration of resistance exercise on perceived exertion10.2466/25.29.PMS.119c30z3 ↗
22. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725 ↗
23. Non-local muscle fatigue: Effects and possible mechanisms10.1007/s00421-015-3249-y ↗
24. Potentiation of bench press throw performance using a heavy load and velocity-based repetition control10.1519/JSC.0000000000003633 ↗
25. Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827de6f1 ↗
26. The effects of plyometric conditioning on post-activation bench press performance10.2478/hukin-2020-0017 ↗
27. Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: Effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c2bdb ↗
28. Does eccentric-only and concentric-only activation increase power output?10.1249/MSS.0000000000002131 ↗
29. Nonlocalized postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects in trained athletes: A pilot study10.1139/apnm-2017-0217 ↗
30. β-Adrenergic modulation of skeletal muscle contraction: Key role of excitation–contraction coupling10.1113/JP270909 ↗
31. The effects of β-adrenoceptor activation on contraction in isolated fast-and slow-twitch skeletal muscle fibres of the rat10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13932.x ↗