Calibration and Validation of a Measurements-Independent Model for Road Traffic Noise Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
The assessment of road traffic noise is very important for the health of people living in urban areas. Noise is usually assessed by field measurements, and predictive models play an important role when experimental data are not available. Nevertheless, when they are based on regression techniques, predictive models suffer from the drawback of strong dependence on the calibration data. In this paper, the authors present a regressive model calibrated on computed noise levels without the need for field measurements. The independence from field measurements makes the model flexible and adjustable for any road traffic condition possible. A multilinear regression technique is applied to establish the correlation between the computed equivalent noise levels and several independent variables, including, among others, traffic flow and distance. The model is then validated on a large field measurement database to check its efficiency in terms of prediction accuracy. The validation is performed both via error distribution analysis and using different error metrics. The results are encouraging, showing that the model provides good results in terms of the average error (less than 2 dBA) and is not susceptible to the presence of outliers in the input data that correspond to unconventional conditions of the traffic flow.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, I-84084 Fisciano, Italy
Funding
Sustainable Mobility Center (MOST)
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. European Environment Agency (2020). Environmental Noise in Europe-2020.
2. Does Traffic-Related Air Pollution Explain Associations of Aircraft and Road Traffic Noise Exposure on Children’s Health and Cognition? A Secondary Analysis of the United Kingdom Sample from the RANCH Project10.1093/aje/kws012 ↗
3. A Review of Adverse Effects of Road Traffic Noise on Human Health10.1142/S021947751830001X ↗
4. Impact of Road Traffic Noise on Sleep Disturbances and Attention Disorders amongst School Children Living in Upper Silesian Industrial Zone, Poland
5. Environmental Noise, Sleep and Health10.1016/j.smrv.2006.09.001 ↗
6. Road Traffic Noise, Sleep and Mental Health10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.010 ↗
7. Impacts of Roundabouts in Suburban Areas on Congestion-Specific Vehicle Speed Profiles, Pollutant and Noise Emissions: An Empirical Analysis10.1016/j.scs.2020.102386 ↗
8. Statistical Models for Traffic Noise at Signalized Intersections10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.040 ↗
9. Modeling Roadway Traffic Noise in a Hot Climate Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.014 ↗
10. Modelling of Traffic Noise in the Vicinity of Urban Road Intersections10.1016/j.trd.2022.103474 ↗
11. The Future of Urban Sound Environments: Impacting Mobility Trends and Insights for Noise Assessment and Mitigation10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107518 ↗
12. Barbarino, M., Ilsami, M., Tuccillo, R., and Federico, L. (2017). Combined CFD-Stochastic Analysis of an Active Fluidic Injection System for Jet Noise Reduction. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060623 ↗
13. Advanced Tools for Traffic Noise Modelling and Prediction
14. Quartieri, J., Iannone, G., and Guarnaccia, C. (2010, January 13–15). On the improvement of statistical traffic noise prediction tools. Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Acoustics and Music: Theory and Applications (AMTA ’10), Iasi, Romania.
15. Quartieri, J., Mastorakis, N.E., Iannone, G., Guarnaccia, C., D’Ambrosio, S., Troisi, A., and Lenza, T.L.L. (2009, January 14–16). A Review of Traffic Noise Predictive Models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Tenerife, Spain.
16. Accuracy of Calculation of Road Traffic Noise10.1016/0003-682X(87)90006-5 ↗
17. (1990). Richtlinien für den Lärmschutz an Strassen (Standard No. RLS-90).
18. NMPB-routes-2008: The revision of the french method for road traffic noise prediction10.3813/AAA.918298 ↗
19. Road traffic noise prediction model “ASJ RTN-Model 2008”: Report of the research committee on road traffic noise10.1250/ast.31.2 ↗
20. SonRoad: New swiss road traffic model
21. (2002). Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 189, 12–26.
22. Kephalopoulos, S., Paviotti, M., and Anfosso-Lédée, F. (2012). Common Noise Assessment Methods in Europe (CNOSSOS-EU), Publications Office of the European Union. EUR 25379 EN.
23. A New Steady-State Traffic Noise Model for Estimating L10(h) on Free Flow Roads Using Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107685 ↗
24. (2023, April 14). Vehicle Classification. Available online: https://www.autoroutes.fr/en/vehicle-classification.htm.
25. A Study on Vehicle Noise Emission Modelling: Correlation with Air Pollutant Emissions, Impact of Kinematic Variables and Critical Hotspots10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147647 ↗
26. Development of Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels for Highway Traffic Noise in Florida
27. Pallas, M.-A., Berengier, M., Muirhead, M., and Morgan, P. (2014, January 7–12). How to consider Electric and Hybrid Electric vehicles in CNOSSOS-EU predicting method?. Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum, Krakow, Poland.
28. Noise and vibration suppression in hybrid electric vehicles: State of the art and challenges10.1016/j.rser.2020.109782 ↗
29. Long-Term Experimental Database for Environmental Acoustics10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.01.008 ↗