journal article·2023-05-05Open access

Effect of Controlled Defoliant Application on Cotton Fiber Quality

Jyoti Neupane, Joe Mari Maja, Gilbert Miller, Michael Marshall, Matthew Cutulle, Jun Luo

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an important industrial crop. It is a perennial crop and has indeterminate growth habit, however, in most parts of the United States, it is grown as an annual crop with the application of growth regulators. Defoliation is a major production practice influencing harvester efficiency, fiber trash content, cotton yield, and fiber quality. Currently, defoliant application is done by using a conventional boom sprayer and aerial spraying in which both systems spray chemicals horizontally downwards from the top of the canopy, which causes minimal chemical to reach at bottom canopy. However, for successful defoliation, each leaf must receive the defoliant as chemicals do not move within the plant. Thus, a new autonomous ground sprayer was developed using robotics and pulse width modulation, which can be run in between two rows covering the whole canopy of the plant. Field research was conducted to study the effect of three duty cycles (20%,40%, and 60%) on cotton fiber quality using autonomous spraying system. The result indicated that the defoliants could be applied safely at either of the three duty cycles without compromising most of the fiber quality parameters except for nep/gm, length (Ln), L (5%), SFC, trash content in field 1 and micronaire, nep size, length (Ln), L (5%), SFC, and fiber fineness in field 2 which were significant. However, application of 20% duty cycle will significantly reduce the chemical use therefore, 20% duty cycle could be a good choice for the autonomous cotton defoliation. The development of autonomous spraying technology would encourage the development of new sprayer industries and the unmanned ground vehicle industries, together with the need for the global development of an agricultural system with broad market prospects and brings about huge economic, social, and ecological benefits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Research in Cotton Cultivation · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agricultural Sciences, Clemson University, 240 McAdams Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, 64 Research Road, Blackville, SC 29817, USA

Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, 171 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Martin O-15, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

Funding

NIFA/USDA · Cotton Inc. · Clemson University Professional Internship · Co-op Program (UPIC)

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Cultivar, irrigation management, and mepiquat chloride strategy: Effects on cotton growth, maturity, yield, and fiber quality10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108633 ↗
2. Wright, D.L., Esquivel, I., George, S., and Small, I. (2022). Cotton Growth and Development, University of Florida. Available online: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/AG235.
3. Smith, C.W., Cantrell, R.G., Moser, H.S., and Oakley, S.R. (1999). Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4. Characterization of the complete genome and P0 protein for a previously unreported genotype of cotton leafroll dwarf virus, an introduced polerovirus in the United States10.1094/PDIS-06-19-1316-RE ↗
5. (2023, January 18). USDA Economic Research Service—Cotton Sector at a Glance, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/cotton-and-wool/cotton-sector-at-a-glance/.
6. Ayala, F., and Silvertooth, J.C. (2001). Physiology of Cotton Defoliation, University of Arizona. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/558537.
7. Xin, F., Zhao, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, G., Han, X., Fu, W., Deng, J., and Lan, Y. (2018). Effects of dosage and spraying volume on cotton defoliants efficacy: A case study based on application of unmanned aerial vehicles. Agronomy, 8.10.3390/agronomy8060085 ↗
8. Gwathmey, C., and Craig, C. (2007). Encyclopedia of Pest Management, CRC Press.
9. Optimization and test for spraying parameters of cotton defoliant sprayer
10. Evaluation of defoliant mixtures in cotton10.1016/0378-4290(92)90018-5 ↗
11. Jones, M., Farmaha, B., Greene, J., Marshall, M., and Mueller, J. (2021). South Carolina Cotton Growers Guide, Clemson University.
12. Du, M.W., Li, Y., Tian, X.L., Duan, L.S., Zhang, M.C., Tan, W.M., Xu, D.Y., and Li, Z.H. (2014). The phytotoxin coronatine induces abscission-related gene expression and boll ripening during defoliation of cotton. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0097652 ↗
13. Evaluation of harvest aid chemicals for the cotton-winter wheat double cropping system10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60226-9 ↗
14. Determination the effect of defoliation timing on cotton yield and quality
15. Ritchie, G.L., Bednarz, C.W., Jost, P.H., and Brown, S.M. (2007). Cotton Growth and Development, University of Georgia.
16. Influence of early defoliation on cotton yield, seed quality, and fiber properties10.1016/0378-4290(94)90042-6 ↗
17. Enhancement of productivity and fiber quality by defining ideal defoliation and harvesting timing in cotton
18. Impact of chemical defoliants on chlorophyll fluorescence, biochemical parameters, yield, and fiber quality of high-density cotton
19. Efficacy of cotton harvest aids applications with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and ground-based field sprayers–A case study comparison10.1016/j.atech.2022.100047 ↗
20. Artificial intelligence (Ai) in agriculture10.1109/MITP.2020.2986121 ↗
21. Plant disease detection using AI based vgg-16 model
22. Annabel, L.S.P., and Muthulakshmi, V. (2019, January 12–14). AI-powered image-based tomato leaf disease detection. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India.10.1109/I-SMAC47947.2019.9032621 ↗
23. Applications of artificial intelligence in agriculture: A Review10.48084/etasr.2756 ↗
24. (2023, April 08). Roots: From Crop Duster to Airline. The Origins of Delta Air Lines to World War II. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/856135269.
25. Subramaniam, R., Hajjaj, S.S.H., Gsangaya, K.R., Sultan, M.T.H., Mail, M.F., and Hua, L.S. (2021). Redesigning dispenser component to enhance performance crop-dusting agriculture drones. Mater. Today Proc., in press.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.015 ↗
26. The relations of leaf area index with the spray quality and efficacy of cotton defoliant spraying using unmanned aerial systems (UASs)10.1016/j.compag.2020.105228 ↗
27. Determining application volume of unmanned aerial spraying systems for cotton defoliation using remote sensing images10.1016/j.compag.2022.106912 ↗
28. Neupane, J., Maja, J.M., Miller, G., Marshall, M., Cutulle, M., Greene, J., Luo, J., and Barnes, E. (2023). The Next Generation of Cotton Defoliation Sprayer. AgriEngineering, 5.10.3390/agriengineering5010029 ↗
29. Variation in the advanced fiber information system cotton fiber length-by-number distribution captured by high volume instrument fiber length parameters10.1177/0040517516688628 ↗
30. Sayeed, M.A. (2020). Improvement of the Cotton Fiber Length Measurements Using High Volume Instrument (HVI) Fibrogram. [Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Tech University].
31. A rapid, direct measurement of short fiber content10.1177/004051759306300307 ↗
32. A method of fibre-length analysis using the fibrograph10.1177/004051754001001203 ↗
33. Robots in healthcare10.1108/01439911111122699 ↗
34. Goudzwaard, M., Smakman, M., and Konijn, E.A. (2019, January 19–22). Robots are good for profit: A business perspective on robots in education. Proceedings of the Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob) 2019, Oslo, Norway.10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850726 ↗
35. Jang, H.W., and Lee, S.B. (2020). Serving robots: Management and applications for restaurant business sustainability. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12103998 ↗
36. Lytridis, C., Kaburlasos, V.G., Pachidis, T., Manios, M., Vrochidou, E., Kalampokas, T., and Chatzistamatis, S. (2021). An overview of cooperative robotics in agriculture. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11091818 ↗
37. Leaf pubescence and defoliation strategy influence on cotton defoliation and fiber quality10.56454/HXYT5212 ↗
38. The influence of defoliation timing on yields and quality of two cotton cultivars10.2135/cropsci2004.1650 ↗
39. Variability in cotton fiber yield, fiber quality, and soil properties in a southeastern coastal plain10.2134/agronj2002.1305 ↗
40. Development and utility of Q-score for characterizing cotton fiber quality
41. Clay, P.A., Young, K.M., and Taylor, E.R. (2006). Effect of Heat Unit Accumulation on Cotton Defoliation, Lint Yield and Fiber Quality, University of Arizona.
42. Balkcom, K.S., Bergtold, J.S., Monks, C.D., Price, A.J., and Delaney, D.P. (2010, January 4–7). Planting and defoliation timing impacts on cotton yield and quality. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans, LA, USA.
43. Valco, T.D. (2023, January 24). Fiber Quality Aspects of Cotton Ginning. Handout in Level III Cotton Ginners Short Course Text 2002. Available online: http://cotton.tamu.edu/Harvest/Ginning%20Quality%20Aspects.pdf.
44. (2023, April 25). What is Micronaire or Mic in Cotton?—Textiles Bar. Available online: https://textilesbar.com/micronaire-grades-in-cotton/.
45. (2023, January 24). Quality Summary of 2022 U.S. Upland Cotton—By State, Fiber Competition 2023, Cotton Incorporated. Available online: https://www.cottoninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/01052023StateCompareRpt.pdf.
46. Bange, M.P., Caton, J., and Hodgson, D. (2012, January 14–18). Assessment of the degree of impact of factors affecting micronaire in cotton. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Agronomy Conference 2012, Armidale, Australia.
47. Environment, and cotton fiber quality10.1007/s10584-016-1715-0 ↗
48. Evaluation of cotton fiber properties in compact yarn spinning processes and investigation of fiber and yarn properties
49. (2023, February 20). U.S. Cotton Fiber Chart 2021/2022. Cotton USA and Cotton Incorporated. Available online: https://www.cottoninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Cotton-Fiber-Chart_Eng-22.pdf.
50. Importance of cotton fiber elongation in fiber processing10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112217 ↗
51. Effect of different sowing dates on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber color at double crop growing conditions
52. Regressional estimation of ring cotton yarn properties from HVI fiber properties10.1177/0040517506062262 ↗
53. Dual-feed rotor spinning of cotton fiber: Trash separation and yarn properties10.1080/00405000.2013.813663 ↗
54. A Comparison of methods for measuring the short fiber content of cotton
55. How current cotton ginning practices affect fiber length uniformity index10.56454/BEES5030 ↗
56. Effect of saw ginning on the fiber quality of bt and non-bt cotton10.7216/teksmuh.1222470 ↗
57. Elmogahzy, Y. (2023, February 13). Learn about the Effect of Fiber Neps. Cotton USA. Available online: https://www.cottonusa.org/expert-outlooks/learn-about-the-effect-of-fiber-neps.
58. Fiber length distribution in cotton processing: Dominant features and interaction effects10.1177/0040517506062616 ↗
59. Cotton fiber length changes in the spinning process on the basis of AFIS measurements10.1177/004051759906901102 ↗
60. Interpretation of AFIS and HVI fiber property measurements in breeding for cotton fiber quality improvement
61. The impact of short fiber content on the quality of cotton ring spun yarn
62. Effects of non-lint material on heritability estimates of cotton fiber length parameters10.1007/s10681-019-2536-9 ↗
63. Ramey, H. (1982). The Meaning and Assessment of Cotton Fiber Fineness, International Institute for Cotton.
64. Characterizations of a distributional parameter that evaluates contents of immature fibers within and among cotton samples10.1007/s10570-021-04135-8 ↗
65. Evaluation of cotton fiber maturity measurements10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.041 ↗