Digital Occlusion Analysis after Orthodontic Treatment: Capabilities of the Intraoral Scanner and T-Scan Novus System
Source abstract
Abstract
Digital technology is becoming increasingly popular in dentistry. The aim of this article is to demonstrate and compare the capabilities of two different digital approaches, namely, intraoral scanning and digital examination of occlusion, in the final analysis of occlusion after orthodontic treatment. The capabilities and limitations of both systems are emphasized to help clinicians determine which system to use in specific cases. Materials and methods: The study included 32 patients (15 males and 17 females) in the retention phase after orthodontic treatment. Patients were aged 15 to 28 years with a mean age of 18.62 years (±4.17), and 62.2% were aged under 18 years. At the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, 18 patients had Angle Class I and 14 had Angle Class II. Overall, 18 patients were treated without extractions and 14 with extractions, while 12 had impacted teeth. All patients wore an Essix retainer in the upper jaw and a fixed canine-to-canine retainer in the lower jaw. Intraoral scanning was performed using Trios color (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014), and digital occlusion imaging was performed using T-Scan Novus (Tekscan, Norwood, MA, USA, 2018). SPSS 23.0 was used to perform descriptive statistical analysis. Result and Conclusion: With the 3Shape system, the contacts are marked based on the proximity between dentitions. The T-Scan system measures the strength of the contacts, regardless of their area. Despite its many advantages, intraoral scanning is not a reliable method for recording occlusions. The results obtained are not incorrect, but they include limited parameters for analysis. The T-Scan system provides comprehensive results and allows analysis and treatment of occlusal dysfunctions. The T-Scan system can provide information on the first contact, strength of the contacts, contact distribution on each tooth, sequence of contacts, maximum bite force and maximum intercuspation, path of the lower jaw movement, and occlusion and disocclusion times as well as record videos with active sequences and distributions of the contacts. There is a good collaboration between intraoral scanning and digital occlusion determination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Department of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
Funding
Medical University of Plovdiv
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Intraoral scanning systems—A current overview
2. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparative study10.14219/jada.2014.23 ↗
3. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review10.4103/jips.jips_327_19 ↗
4. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x ↗
5. Imburgia, M., Logozzo, S., Hauschild, U., Veronesi, G., Mangano, C., and Mangano, F.G. (2017). Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 17.10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 ↗
6. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review10.1111/jopr.12218 ↗
7. Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.205 ↗
8. Button, H., Kois, J.C., Barmak, A.B., Zeitler, J.M., Rutkunas, V., and Revilla-León, M. (2023). Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.025 ↗
9. Bedrossian, E.A., Bedrossian, E., Kois, J.C., and Revilla-León, M. (2022). Use of an optical jaw-tracking system to record mandibular motion for treatment planning and designing interim and definitive prostheses: A dental technique. J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.036 ↗
10. Revilla-León, M., Zeitler, J.M., and Kois, J.C. (2022). Digital maxillomandibular relationship and mandibular motion recording by using an optical jaw tracking system to acquire a dynamic virtual patient. J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.012 ↗
11. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104478 ↗
12. The use of a dynamic real-time jaw tracking device and cone beam computed tomography simulation10.4103/2231-0746.186142 ↗
13. Refining occlusion with muscle balance to enhance long-term orthodontic stability10.17796/jcpd.29.2.lk435w70505t1668 ↗
14. Orthodontics and occlusion10.1038/sj.bdj.4801229 ↗
15. Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: A 40-year perspective10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.012 ↗
16. Retention and relapse in clinical practice10.1111/adj.12475 ↗
17. Contemporary approaches to orthodontic retention10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00509.x ↗
18. Orthodontic retention protocols: An evidence-based overview10.1038/s41415-021-2954-7 ↗
19. Factors affecting orthodontists’ management of the retention phase10.2319/051313-372.1 ↗
20. Prosthetic Occlusal Analyzers—A Comprehensive Review
21. Occlusion indicators: A review10.4103/0972-4052.41066 ↗
22. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulation paper mark area10.2174/1874210600701010001 ↗
23. (2023, February 09). Available online: https://www.tekscan.com/products-solutions/systems/t-scan-novus.
24. Validity and reliability of the T-Scan® III for measuring force under laboratory conditions10.1111/joor.12284 ↗
25. Customized procedure to display T-Scan occlusal contacts10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.006 ↗
26. Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine
27. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices10.1007/s00784-022-04542-6 ↗
28. Occlusion in the digital era: A report on 3 cases
29. Kerstein, R.B. (2020). Handbook of Research on Clinical Applications of Computerized Occlusal Analysis in Dental Medicine, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-9254-9 ↗
30. Reliability and validity of T-scan and 3d intraoral scanning for measuring the occlusal contact area10.1111/jopr.13096 ↗
31. The Digital Impression As An Initial Unit Of Modern Dental Medicine-Literature Review
32. Teledentistry Methods In Orthodontics And Prosthetic Dentistry During COVID-19 Pandemic
33. Reddy, L.K.V., Madithati, P., Narapureddy, B.R., Ravula, S.R., Vaddamanu, S.K., Alhamoudi, F.H., Minervini, G., and Chaturvedi, S. (2022). Perception about Health Applications (Apps) in Smartphones towards Telemedicine during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Pers. Med., 12.10.3390/jpm12111920 ↗
34. Monitoring of awake bruxism by intelligent app10.12688/f1000research.110673.2 ↗
35. T-scan system in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders–A review10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_46_19 ↗
36. Digital Evaluation of Functional Occlusion Parameters and their Association with Temporomandibular Disorders
37. Minervini, G., Mariani, P., Fiorillo, L., Cervino, G., Cicciù, M., and Laino, L. (2022). Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CRANIO®, 1–9.10.1080/08869634.2022.2137129 ↗
38. Stem cells in temporomandibular joint engineering: State of art and future persectives10.1097/SCS.0000000000008771 ↗
39. Protocol for clinical articulation of complete dentures in maximum intercuspation10.17116/stomat20199801145 ↗
40. Application of aesthetic crowns in children patients10.14748/vmf.v7i1.5074 ↗
41. Removable prosthetic treatment in children-literature review
42. T-Scan III system diagnostic tool for digital occlusal analysis in orthodontics–a modern approach10.2478/prilozi-2014-0020 ↗
43. Characteristics of static and excursive occlusal parameters in subjects seeking orthodontic treatment using t-scan 9 digital occlusal analysis
44. Doh, R.M., Kim, J.E., Nam, N.E., Shin, S.H., Lim, J.H., and Shim, J.S. (2021). Evaluation of Dimensional Changes during Postcuring of a Three-Dimensionally Printed Denture Base According to the Curing Time and the Time of Removal of the Support Structure: An In Vitro Study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110000 ↗
45. Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: A randomized clinical trial
46. Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study10.1016/j.jpor.2015.06.002 ↗
47. Lee, S.J., Kim, S.W., Lee, J.J., and Cheong, C.W. (2020). Comparison of intraoral and extraoral digital scanners: Evaluation of surface topography and precision. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8020052 ↗
48. Comparison of closure occlusal force parameters in post-orthodontic and non-orthodontic subjects using T-Scan® III DMD occlusal analysis10.1080/08869634.2015.1122277 ↗
49. Digital analysis of occlusion using T-Scan III in orthodontics10.4103/0301-5742.186386 ↗
50. Morsy, N., and El Kateb, M. (2022). Accuracy of intraoral scanners for static virtual articulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.005 ↗
51. Cohen-Levy, J. (2015). Orthodontic T-Scan Applications. Handb. Res. Comput. Occlusal Anal. Technol. Appl. Dent. Med., 523–561.10.4018/978-1-4666-6587-3.ch011 ↗
52. Cohen-Levy, J. (2020). Orthodontic Monitoring and Case Finishing With the T-Scan System. Handb. Res. Clin. Appl. Comput. Occlusal Anal. Dent. Med., 1057–1124.10.4018/978-1-5225-9254-9.ch015 ↗
53. Case Report: A digital workflow in the treatment of bruxism in a young patient10.12688/f1000research.72961.2 ↗
54. Case Report: Digital analysis of occlusion with T-Scan Novus in occlusal splint treatment for a patient with bruxism10.12688/f1000research.72951.1 ↗
55. Algorithm for computerized analysis of static, dynamic and functional occlusion in patients with bruxism and bruxomania
56. Park, H.R., Park, J.M., Chun, Y.S., Lee, K.N., and Kim, M. (2015). Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking. BMC Oral. Health, 15.10.1186/s12903-015-0140-5 ↗
57. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: A prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial10.1186/s13005-020-00222-6 ↗
58. Christopoulou, I., Kaklamanos, E.G., Makrygiannakis, M.A., Bitsanis, I., Perlea, P., and Tsolakis, A.I. (2022). Intraoral scanners in Orthodontics: A critical review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031407 ↗
59. T-Scan a digital pathway to occlusal perfection: A review