Management of Used COVID-19 Personal Protective Equipment: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Using a science mapping approach, we analyzed the exponential increase in the number of scientific documents about the negative environmental impacts produced by waste from personal protective equipment (PPE), especially face masks, used to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission worldwide. Our results revealed that India, China, and Canada are leaders in this research field, which is clearly related to environmental issues, but also the solutions developed from an engineering point of view. Our analysis of the most-relevant documents in the field uncovered the considerable negative effects of PPE waste in aquatic media, its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, effects on wildlife, etc. To reduce the negative environmental impacts of PPE waste, we need to implement innovative ecodesign strategies for their green production, including their re-use as and the use of recycling materials, but also a collaboration with the population to reduce PPE waste at its source. Both action lines could be materialized by establishing a collective, extended producer responsibility system for PPE to ensure their sustainable production and consumption. These well-implemented strategies will contribute to maintaining progress towards achieving sustainable development goals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management · COVID-19 impact on air quality · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, High Technical School of Civil Engineering, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Aula del Mar CEIA-Mar, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Funding
European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) · the Ministry of Economic Transformation, Industry, Knowledge and Universities, Junta de Andalucía (Spain)
References (99)
Show source-provided references
1. An emerging source of plastic pollution: Environmental presence of plastic personal protective equipment (PPE) debris related to COVID-19 in a metropolitan city10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116160 ↗
2. Challenges and strategies for effective plastic waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141514 ↗
3. COVID-19 Pandemic Repercussions on the Use and Management of Plastics10.1021/acs.est.0c02178 ↗
4. COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on plastic and antiviral polymeric textile causing pollution on beaches and coasts of South America10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144365 ↗
5. Rethinking and optimising plastic waste management under COVID-19 pandemic: Policy solutions based on redesign and reduction of single-use plastics and personal protective equipment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140565 ↗
6. (2022, July 07). Acoplásticos.com. Sector Plástico Aumenta la Fabricación de Insumos Para la Salud Ante el COVID-19. Available online: https://www.acoplasticos.org/index.php/mnu-noti/352-ns-200403.
7. Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations10.1016/j.cej.2020.126683 ↗
8. Ministry of Economy, T., and Industry, J.M. (2022, July 07). Current Status of Production and Supply of Face Masks, Antiseptics and Toilet Paper, Available online: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/covid-19/mask.html.
9. Softys (2022, July 07). Softys Comenzará a Fabricar Barbijos en Argentina con Distribución Gratuita Durante la Emergencia Sanitaria. Available online: https://www.softys.com.ar/noticias/softys-comenzara-a-fabricar-barbijos-en-argentina-con-distribuciongratuita-durante-la-emergencia-sanitaria.
10. Giungato, P., Rana, R.L., Nitti, N., Cavallari, C., and Tricase, C. (2021). Carbon Footprint of Surgical Masks Made in Taranto to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Diffusion: A Preliminary Assessment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116296 ↗
11. Environmental impact of Personal Protective Equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic10.1177/01410768211001583 ↗
12. The energy and environmental footprints of COVID-19 fighting measures—PPE, disinfection, supply chains10.1016/j.energy.2020.118701 ↗
13. The impact and effectiveness of the general public wearing masks to reduce the spread of pandemics in the UK: A multidisciplinary comparison of single-use masks versus reusable face masks
14. COVID-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140279 ↗
15. Disinfection technology of hospital wastes and wastewater: Suggestions for disinfection strategy during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114665 ↗
16. A critical synthesis of current peer-reviewed literature on the environmental and human health impacts of COVID-19 PPE litter: New findings and next steps10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126945 ↗
17. Face masks related to COVID-19 in the beaches of the Moroccan Mediterranean: An emerging source of plastic pollution10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113181 ↗
18. What we need to know about PPE associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the marine environment10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111879 ↗
19. The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on marine litter pollution along the Kenyan Coast: A synthesis after 100 days following the first reported case in Kenya10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111840 ↗
20. Wang, Z., Guy, C., Ng, K., and An, C. (2021). A New Challenge for the Management and Disposal of Personal Protective Equipment Waste during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137034 ↗
21. Face masks as a source of nanoplastics and microplastics in the environment: Quantification, characterization, and potential for bioaccumulation10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117748 ↗
22. Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117485 ↗
23. Discharge of microplastics fibres from wet wipes in aquatic and solid environments under different release conditions10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147144 ↗
24. Uncovering the release of micro/nanoplastics from disposable face masks at times of COVID-1910.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126507 ↗
25. Sterilization of disposable face masks by means of standardized dry and steam sterilization processes; an alternative in the fight against mask shortages due to COVID-1910.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.001 ↗
26. N95 respirator decontamination: A study in reusability10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100148 ↗
27. Decontamination of surgical face masks and N95 respirators by dry heat pasteurization for one hour at 70 C10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.026 ↗
28. Can N95 Respirators Be Reused after Disinfection? How Many Times?10.1021/acsnano.0c03597 ↗
29. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1038/s41598-021-97188-5 ↗
30. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment, waste management, and energy sectors: A deeper look into the long-term impacts10.1007/s11356-022-20259-1 ↗
31. Mohamed Noor, N., Sam, S.T., and Abdul Kadir, A. (2022, January 13–15). A Study on the Environmental Impact During Distribution and Disposal Stages for the 3-Ply Face Masks by Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Green Environmental Engineering and Technology, Penang, Malaysia.
32. Harussani, M.M., Sapuan, S.M., Rashid, U., and Khalina, A. (2021). Development and Characterization of Polypropylene Waste from Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)-Derived Char-Filled Sugar Palm Starch Biocomposite Briquettes. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13111707 ↗
33. Combining Mapping and Citation Analysis for Evaluative Bibliometric Purposes: A Bibliometric Study10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
34. Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011 ↗
35. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
36. Using Scopus’s CiteScore for assessing the quality of computer science conferences
37. A comprehensive overview of geopolymer composites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review
38. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field
39. Kawshalya, L., Weerasinghe, U., and Chandrasekara, D. (2020, January 15–16). Fear of Crime in Urban Environments: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Literature. Proceedings of the 2020 From Innovation to Impact (FITI), Online.10.1109/FITI52050.2020.9424901 ↗
40. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8 ↗
41. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry10.1007/BF02019280 ↗
42. Improper Solid Waste Management Increases Potential for COVID-19 Spread in Developing Countries10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104947 ↗
43. Medical waste management practice during the 2019-2020 novel Coronavirus pandemic: Experience in a general hospital10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.035 ↗
44. Scott, R.A. (2005). Textiles for Protection, Woodhead Publishing.10.1201/9781439823811.pt3 ↗
45. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks10.1021/acsnano.0c03252 ↗
46. Reusable masks for COVID-19: A missing piece of the microplastic problem during the global health crisis10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111777 ↗
47. (2022, July 07). World Wide Fund for Nature Nello Smaltimento di Macherine e Guanti Serve Resposabilità. Available online: https://www.wwf.it/scuole/?53500%2FNello-smaltimento-di-mascherine-e-guanti-serveresponsabilita.
48. COVID-19 pandemic: Solid waste and environmental impacts in Brazil10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142471 ↗
49. Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-1910.1016/j.rser.2020.109883 ↗
50. Disinfection technology and strategies for COVID-19 hospital and bio-medical waste management10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141652 ↗
51. Zhang, E.J., Aitchison, L.P., Phillips, N., Shaban, R.Z., and Kam, A.W. (2021). Protecting the environment from plastic PPE. BMJ, 372.10.1136/bmj.n109 ↗
52. Abandoned COVID-19 personal protective equipment along the Bushehr shores, the Persian Gulf: An emerging source of secondary microplastics in coastlines10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112386 ↗
53. Personal protective equipment (PPE) disposal during COVID-19: An emerging source of microplastic and microfiber pollution in the environment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160322 ↗
54. Nowakowski, P., Kuśnierz, S., Sosna, P., Mauer, J., and Maj, D. (2020). Disposal of Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Challenge for Waste Collection Companies and Society: A Case Study in Poland. Resources, 9.10.3390/resources9100116 ↗
55. A novel cooperative model in the collection of infectious waste in COVID-19 pandemic10.1108/JM2-07-2020-0189 ↗
56. Scheinberg, A., Woolridge, A., Humez, N., Mavropoulos, A., Silva Filho, C., Savino, A., and Ramola, A. (2020). Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic, World Society for the Protection of Animals. Technical Report.
57. Extended use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic—Thermal conditioning and spray-on surface disinfection10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109251 ↗
58. Development of a novel self-sanitizing mask prototype to combat the spread of infectious disease and reduce unnecessary waste10.1038/s41598-021-97357-6 ↗
59. A review on pyrolysis of plastic wastes10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.037 ↗
60. Efficient recycling of disposable face masks via co-carbonization with waste biomass: A pathway to a cleaner environment10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100094 ↗
61. Castellote, M., Jiménez-Relinque, E., Grande, M., Rubiano, F.J., and Castillo, A. (2022). Face Mask Wastes as Cementitious Materials: A Possible Solution to a Big Concern. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15041371 ↗
62. Effective recycling of disposable medical face masks for sustainable green concrete via a new fiber hybridization technique10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128245 ↗
63. Szefer, E.M., Majka, T.M., and Pielichowski, K. (2021). Characterization and Combustion Behavior of Single-Use Masks Used during COVID-19 Pandemic. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14133501 ↗
64. Kaushal, R., Rohit, R., and Dhaka, A.K. (2022). A comprehensive review of the application of plasma gasification technology in circumventing the medical waste in a post-COVID-19 scenario. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery.10.1007/s13399-022-02434-z ↗
65. Thermochemical treatment of daily COVID-19 single-use face mask waste: Power generation potential and environmental impact analysis10.1016/j.energy.2022.123707 ↗
66. Facemasks and ferrous metallurgy: Improving gasification reactivity of low-volatile coals using waste COVID-19 face masks for ironmaking application10.1038/s41598-022-06691-w ↗
67. Council of European Union (2022, October 11). Directive Waste (EU) no 2008/98. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008L0098.
68. Prasad, M.N.V., Vithanage, M., and Borthakur, A. (2020). Handbook of Electronic Waste Management, Butterworth-Heinemann.
69. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean10.1126/science.1260352 ↗
70. Cornelio, A., Zanoletti, A., Federici, S., Ciacci, L., Depero, L.E., and Bontempi, E. (2022). Environmental Impact of Surgical Masks Consumption in Italy due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15062046 ↗
71. Life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks10.1007/s11356-021-17430-5 ↗
72. Carbon footprint assessment of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on different protective performance and applicable scenarios10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135854 ↗
73. Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses10.1126/science.abd9149 ↗
74. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-110.1056/NEJMc2004973 ↗
75. Effective ventilation and air disinfection system for reducing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection risk in office buildings10.1016/j.scs.2021.103408 ↗
76. Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission10.1126/science.abg6296 ↗
77. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions
78. Andeobu, L., Wibowo, S., and Grandhi, S. (2022). Medical Waste from COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Management and Environmental Impacts in Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031381 ↗
79. Physical and chemical degradation of littered personal protective equipment (PPE) under simulated environmental conditions10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113587 ↗
80. An investigation into the leaching of micro and nano particles and chemical pollutants from disposable face masks—Linked to the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.watres.2021.117033 ↗
81. COVID-19: Performance study of microplastic inhalation risk posed by wearing masks10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124955 ↗
82. The release process of microfibers: From surgical face masks into the marine environment10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100042 ↗
83. Neglected microplastics pollution in global COVID-19: Disposable surgical masks10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148130 ↗
84. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014 ↗
85. Detection of nanoparticles in Dutch surface waters10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.238 ↗
86. Malakar, A., Snow, D., and Ray, C. (2019). Irrigation Water Quality–A Contemporary Perspective. Water, 11.10.3390/w11071482 ↗
87. COVID-19 face masks: A new source of human and environmental exposure to organophosphate esters10.1016/j.envint.2021.106654 ↗
88. Single-Use Face Masks as a Potential Source of Synthetic Antioxidants to the Environment10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00422 ↗
89. Do Thi, H.T., Mizsey, P., and Toth, A.J. (2021). Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132212574 ↗
90. Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.108 ↗
91. The effects of COVID-19 litter on animal life10.1163/15707563-bja10052 ↗
92. Risks of COVID-19 face masks to wildlife: Present and future research needs10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148505 ↗
93. Kühn, S., Bravo Rebolledo, E.L., and van Franeker, J.A. (2015). Marine Anthropogenic Litter, Springer International Publishing.
94. Clinical Pathology of Plastic Ingestion in Marine Birds and Relationships with Blood Chemistry10.1021/acs.est.9b02098 ↗
95. Plastic and Non-plastic Debris Ingestion in Three Gull Species Feeding in an Urban Landfill Environment10.1007/s00244-017-0492-8 ↗
96. Butterworth, A., and Clegg, I. (2012). Marine Debris: A Global Picture of the Impact on Animal Welfare and of Animal-Focused Solutions, World Society for the Protection of Animals. Technical Report.
97. Mortality of a juvenile Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus, Spheniscidae) associated with the ingestion of a PFF-2 protective mask during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112232 ↗
98. Nests of the brown booby (Sula leucogaster) as a potential indicator of tropical ocean pollution by marine debris10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.005 ↗
99. The prevalence and source of plastic incorporated into nests of five seabird species on a small offshore island10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111076 ↗