journal article·2023-02-10Open access

Gamification Based on User Types: When and Where It Is Worth Applying

Laia Subirats, Tuula Nousiainen, Apoorwa Hooda, Luis Rubio-Andrada, Santi Fort, Mikko Vesisenaho, G. M. Sacha

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

Students’ motivation is one of the most relevant factors when improving the quality of the learning process. In this context, gamification is a powerful tool for increasing motivation at all levels of teaching. Since gamification methodologies can be applied in many different ways, personalizing gamified activities as a function of gamification user types is a promising strategy. Knowing the user types is also an advantage to understand the nature of learners in the class. In this article, we present the findings from several pilot exercises, where we identified gamification user types among students from Spain and Finland, analyzing their prevalence as a function of age, gender, country, and field of study. We also designed a gamification experience where activities were designed to fit the preferences of different user types. From these pilot experiences, we found that gamification user types are only relevant when other variables, such as the difficulty of the tasks or the presence of students who do not work well in groups, are not present. Based on our findings, we conclude that distance learning and subjects where previous knowledge is not present are good choices when gamifying a subject.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Educational Games and Gamification · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Online Learning and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Training Department, Eurecat—Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, C/Bilbao, 72, 08005 Barcelona, Spain

ADaS Lab, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Teacher Education, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Student and Academic Services, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Funding

ACC1Ó, Spain, under the project TutorIA and by Fondo Supera COVID-19

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Pereira, L., and Guerreiro, J. (2021, January 24–29). Evaluation on Moodle LMS data usage during the first wave of COVID-19’s pandemic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Virtual Event. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-030-78095-1_13 ↗
2. Gameful design for learning
3. Digital games in the classroom? A contextual approach to teachers’ adoption intention of digital games in formal education
4. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2011). Lulu. [2nd ed.].10.1145/1943208.1943210 ↗
5. The Effect of Achievement Badges on Students’ Behavior: An Empirical Study in a University-Level Computer Science Course10.3991/ijet.v10i1.4221 ↗
6. Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., and Chan, G. (2011, January 7–12). Practical, appropriate, empirically-validated guidelines for designing educational games. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1978942.1979229 ↗
7. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 ↗
8. The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 ↗
9. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 ↗
10. Nousiainen, T., Vesisenaho, M., Ahlstrom, E., Peltonen, M., Fort, S., and Gómez, S. (2020, January 21–23). Gamifying Teacher Students’ Learning Platform: Information and Communication Technology in Teacher Education courses. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), Salamanca, Spain.10.1145/3434780.3436659 ↗
11. Player Types: A Meta-synthesis
12. The effects of player type on performance: A gamification case study10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.005 ↗
13. Hooda, A., Nousiainen, T., Vesisenaho, M., Ahlstrom, E., Fort, S., Subirats, L., and Sacha, G.M. (2022, January 8–11). School of Digital Wizards: Exploring the Gamification User Types in a Blended IT Course. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden.10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962592 ↗
14. Tondello, G.F., Wehbe, R.R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., and Nacke, L.E. (2016, January 16–19). The gamification user types hexad scale. Proceedings of the 2016 annual symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY), Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/2967934.2968082 ↗
15. Empirical validation of the Gamification User Types Hexad scale in English and Spanish10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.002 ↗
16. Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007 ↗
17. Toda, A.M., Oliveira, W., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I.I., Isotani, S., and Cristea, A. (2019, January 2–5). Planning gamification strategies based on user characteristics and DM: A gender-based case study. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Montreal, QC, Canada.
18. Slamet, T.I., Setyosari, P., Al Maki, W.F., Varelo, J., and Oktaviani, H.I. (2019, January 4–5). Engagement experiences on using gamified platform in pre-service teacher education. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET), Malang, Indonesia.10.1109/ICET48172.2019.8987205 ↗
19. Gamification for enhancing Web 2.0 based educational activities: The case of pre-service grade school teachers using educational Wiki pages10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.003 ↗
20. Gamificación como estrategia didáctica. Aplicación en la formación del profesor
21. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs
22. User types
23. Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations10.1006/ceps.2000.1040 ↗
24. Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., and Specht, M. (2019). The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review. Informatics, 6.10.3390/informatics6030032 ↗
25. Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048 ↗
26. Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again10.3102/00346543071001001 ↗
27. Marczewski, A. (2018). Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play: Unicorn Edition, Gamified UK.
28. The Hidden Power of Small Rewards: The Effects of Insufficient External Rewards on Autonomous Motivation to Learn10.5465/amle.2012.0284 ↗